Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Samuel S" data-source="post: 129506130" data-attributes="member: 1754664">It is a mystery, and one that with privacy laws may never be revealed.One thing that would be a relatively simple explanation for why the &quot;insiders&quot; were all wrong about it being &quot;3 games&quot; is that it appears the actual rule is a 2nd positive requires a suspension of 10% of the season. As the absolute minimum number of games WVU could play is 32 (1st round B12 tourney loss and no invite to anything),&nbsp; 3 games is not quite 10% of the season. Perhaps when a team plays&nbsp; a number of games not divisible by 10, the suspension must exceed 10%.&nbsp;&nbsp; In terms of &quot;passing a test. Marijuana is fat soluble not water soluble and detectable for a longer period of time than other recreational drugs on the screen. But, I would not think &quot;passing&quot; after an initial positive would mean a &quot;negative&quot; result. It doesn't for LE purposes. The initial positive test sets a benchmark. The following tests administered soon afterward don't have to be clean for marijuana but they do have to show the levels have dropped by an amount consistent with no use after the initial positive.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Samuel S, post: 129506130, member: 1754664"] It is a mystery, and one that with privacy laws may never be revealed. One thing that would be a relatively simple explanation for why the "insiders" were all wrong about it being "3 games" is that it appears the actual rule is a 2nd positive requires a suspension of 10% of the season. As the absolute minimum number of games WVU could play is 32 (1st round B12 tourney loss and no invite to anything), 3 games is not quite 10% of the season. Perhaps when a team plays a number of games not divisible by 10, the suspension must exceed 10%. In terms of "passing a test. Marijuana is fat soluble not water soluble and detectable for a longer period of time than other recreational drugs on the screen. But, I would not think "passing" after an initial positive would mean a "negative" result. It doesn't for LE purposes. The initial positive test sets a benchmark. The following tests administered soon afterward don't have to be clean for marijuana but they do have to show the levels have dropped by an amount consistent with no use after the initial positive. [/QUOTE]

Name