I'd always kind of thought they might be fake. I don't think so any more. I told a couple of guys at work about it and one of them went to YouTube and searched for it. He found plenty of screen shots, but when he tried to click on them he just got a message that due to copyright infringement the video had been removed. Surprised the hell out of me. For one, I didn't think YouTube allowed any nudity at all. And for another, if you're removing the video due to copyright infringement, shouldn't you also remove the screen shot?fishwater99 said:Tits are real too..
contanza only you can answer this question honestly, but if you watched that video, even once, then you don't have a leg to stand on...MSUCostanza said:I mean, really. Do you not feel any sympathy for her? It's not like she posed nude in a magazine. I guess you'd be cool if some dude videotaped your wife through a peephole? Some people amaze me. It's one thing to check out pics/videos of women that are willingly doing it. Got no problem with that. But this is disturbing and criminal.
but I see no possible scenario where this could be considered disgusting. And please, you know you watched it. There are a lot of wrong things that happen in this world and if we were all better people we could circle up around the fire and sing Kumbaya but that's not life now is it? I'm all for finding and punishing the guy who did this but it's done and there is nothing to be gained by me adverting my eyes. So we get it, you feel like a dad here or something. Your objection is noted. Move on to another post and quit imposing your flawed morality on the rest of us.MSUCostanza said:I mean, really. Do you not feel any sympathy for her? It's not like she posed nude in a magazine. I guess you'd be cool if some dude videotaped your wife through a peephole? Some people amaze me. It's one thing to check out pics/videos of women that are willingly doing it. Got no problem with that. But this is disturbing and criminal.