Hearing the new college bats are terrible...

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
and will significantly decrease power numbers.

This really works to Cohen's advantage all the way around.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
and will significantly decrease power numbers.

This really works to Cohen's advantage all the way around.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
THE reason. He said in an article he's heard safety and also heard pace of the game.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
55,962
24,941
113
College baseball is more like pinball baseball. Maybe if the bats were more like real bats, you wouldn't have pitchers having to work the edges all the time (and walking a lot of batters even with the ridiculously wide strike zone college umpires usually give them) and could actually challenge a hitter.
 

jakldawg

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
4,374
0
36
"losing teams in bowl games?" thread.<div>
</div><div>EVERYBODY IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL GETS A TROPHY NOW!</div><div>BASEBALL CAN'T USE BATS WHERE YOU CAN CHECK-SWING A HOME RUN ANYMORE?!?</div><div>THIS COUNTRY IS RUINED!!!1!!</div><div>
</div>
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
mandating a difference of 3 instead of 5. I can't believe they ever let any of these guys swing with those things. That's how you get scores like 21-14 in the 1998 CWS final. That's also how people get killed.

I think its probably been a technology deal. Just needed to develop it.
 

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,607
2,148
113
There is no arguing that the bats used in college baseball are much more dangerous than wooden bats
 

tenureplan

Senior
Dec 3, 2008
8,372
981
113
but he very well could have. I'm not aware of college players dying year after year either though.
 

tenureplan

Senior
Dec 3, 2008
8,372
981
113
I'm saying that maybe they should start playing with plastic bats and balls because players "could" die or get hurt from either.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
55,962
24,941
113
tenureplan said:
I'm not aware of college players dying year after year either though.
here's a scientific study that shows thatinjury rates from aluminum bats are 3 times as high as from wood bats.

]
 

tenureplan

Senior
Dec 3, 2008
8,372
981
113
but in the same study, the impact or the actual damage done was far worse with the wooden bats. where all of the aluminum bat injuries were bruises, there were several fractures and one concussion with the wooden bats.

Thus, I would have to say that the evidence is inconclusive.
 

Lion O

Redshirt
Jul 31, 2009
473
0
0
Maybe they could also make these players pay for every single bat they use as well, because that was how baseball was meant to be played.
 

Todd4State

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
will be the ones that have good pitching. Now pitchers can jam hitters inside.

It probably will be to our advantage in some ways, though. Cohen wants a team with a lot of speed, and those teams typically have guys that are not power guys. It should be a little bit less of an adjustment for guys like CT Bradford and Jaron Shepherd. A guy like a Conner Powers or a Ryan Duffy would fly out more than they would in the past.

It's also going to make playing good defense even more imperative as well, and I think we'll probably see a lot more small ball. It might not be a bad thing.
 

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,724
10,319
113
I mean, when you take as many f'n strike threes looking as we do, does it really matter if the bat on the shoulder is aircraft aluminum or tin foil?
 

Todd4State

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
dying from getting struck be a batted ball was Ray Chapman of the Cleveland Indians in the early 1900's. Of course, that was off of a wood bat. Someone hit a ball that hit him in the temple, and killed him. Back then, they used baseballs that were often very dirty, and obviously more of a brown color, so MLB started making the umpires use newer, white baseballs even more.

I have actually heard of more damage from batters getting hit in the head from pitches. Like Tony Conigliaro in the late 60's, and Adam Greenberg of the Chicago Cubs earlier in this decade.

I remember Juan Encanarcion of the Cardinals was hit by a ball while on deck, and that ended his career.

The biggest danger with wood bats is that they break from time to time, and there is added danger because you have lots of objects moving- the ball and the sharp wooden pieces. Those can distract a fielder or a runner, which adds to the danger.

So, wood bats are not exactly totally friendly either.

I do support college baseball using wood, because I do not think that technology can replicate wood at this time in a form that will not break. I think all things being equal, they should use wood. Colleges did it for years until the 70's, and didn't seem to have a huge financial burden doing so.
 

AceLeroy

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
284
0
0
Todd4State said:
And most schools have to replace them after a year anyway.
Not on a one time buy , Metal bats are more costly than wood but themetal bats last so much longer than Wood that in the long run , Woodcost a lot more than metal.
 

Todd4State

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
AceLeroy said:
Todd4State said:
And most schools have to replace them after a year anyway.
Not on a one time buy , Metal bats are more costly than wood but themetal bats last so much longer than Wood that in the long run , Woodcost a lot more than metal.


You could buy a wooden bat for about 100 dollars (high quality, Louisville Slugger, and a maple bat will cost about 120), but based on some numbers that I ran on how often MLB players go through bats (50 a year per wikianswers, so I have no idea how reliable that actually is), and I figured out how many bats a MLB player would go through during a 56 game season, and I came up with 14. So, if my math is anywhere near accurate, that's 1400 dollars in bats. Those are individual bats, and I'm sure that if there was a bat contract, they would probably be a little bit cheaper than they would idivudually.

A high quality aluminum bat will cost about 200+ dollars (Individual, same bat contract rules apply) , and should last all year. Players will go through 1-2 of those a year.

But the fact remains- colleges used wood for years and I can't think of a program that went belly-up because they used wood bats. Also, the Cape Cod and many other leagues use wood as well. So, while it is cheaper in the long run to use metal, using wood bats can be done.

I really would love to see wood in college baseball. If cost is that big of an issue (and I'm sure it is), I would be OK with a compromise of maybe using wood bats in some of the elite conference's (SEC, PAC-10, ACC, etc) conference games, and then metal against those that can not afford wood. It would just add so much to the quality of product on the field in that I think it would be baseball in a more "true" form.
 

BleedtheFreak

Redshirt
Jun 29, 2009
58
0
0
Todd4State said:
dying from getting struck be a batted ball was Ray Chapman of the Cleveland Indians in the early 1900's. Of course, that was off of a wood bat. Someone hit a ball that hit him in the temple, and killed him. Back then, they used baseballs that were often very dirty, and obviously more of a brown color, so MLB started making the umpires use newer, white baseballs even more.

I have actually heard of more damage from batters getting hit in the head from pitches. Like Tony Conigliaro in the late 60's, and Adam Greenberg of the Chicago Cubs earlier in this decade.

I remember Juan Encanarcion of the Cardinals was hit by a ball while on deck, and that ended his career.

The biggest danger with wood bats is that they break from time to time, and there is added danger because you have lots of objects moving- the ball and the sharp wooden pieces. Those can distract a fielder or a runner, which adds to the danger.

So, wood bats are not exactly totally friendly either.

I do support college baseball using wood, because I do not think that technology can replicate wood at this time in a form that will not break. I think all things being equal, they should use wood. Colleges did it for years until the 70's, and didn't seem to have a huge financial burden doing so.
<div>
</div>There was a minor league first base coach that got smoked by a ball in the head a few years back that got killed.<div>
</div><div>http://sports.espn.go.com/minorlbb/news/story?id=2945798

</div>
 

Bulldog Bruce

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2007
4,565
4,829
113
With the few scholarships left available to Baseball, college baseball should sell itself better as a preparation for professional baseball. For that reason they should go to wood bats. Most people playing college ball have a dream of going to the next level. This way they can prepare for life with an education and prepare for Baseball with the use of the tools they will be required to use at the next level.

I know in my day it was a big concern for scouts how to properly evaluate a player concerning their transition to a wood bat. I played right in the time of the change over from wood to aluminum. I used wood mostly until I was in high school. I found a Wilson Indestructo that was the first aluminum bat that would not bend or crack from my usage in my junior year of HS. When I got to State we used the Worth Tennessee Thumpers, but they would bend and collapse. I had actually brought the last of my Joe Torre Adirondack bats with me to State. Then I found the Easton during the CWS in 1979 and that bat was solid. I used a 35 in 31 oz monster. Even then I had two of them because they would not last a full season.
 
J

JimHalpert.nafoom

Guest
is that college teams, at least SEC teams, don't pay for their bats. The coaches get tossed a nice chunk of change to use a company's bats exclusively.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
Let's say you go to wood bats. A kid gets drafted out of high school. My thought is that he is more likely to go pro now b/c he could get exposed in college with the wood bat far easier and never get drafted again. Obviously, this applies to position players.
 

Bulldog Bruce

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2007
4,565
4,829
113
The better players are going to be better whether they use wood or metal. Use of wood in college will allow the player to experience the transition in college and have 2 to 4 years to make the adjustment. In the Pros they are not as patient and those adjustment years will be more critical.

I am a firm believer you should practice like you play. Heck, I think a batter should wear their helmet whenever they swing a bat. I went to Sam Houston State last year to have Coach Mark Johnson evaluate my nephew for us. It was a high school players "tryout day" type of camp. During the batting part they had the BP pitcher setup about 45 feet from home plate. It was kind of like they do in the HomeRun derby. I talked to Coach Johnson after the camp and told him I disagreed with evaluating kids in that fashion. I watched these kids and they never got to load their swings. They probably were not used to that drill. They basically had to guess when to load up because the time of the ball flight was significantly shorter. Therefore you were not really seeing the player as they might actually be in a game.

With all that said, I would have preferred to play college ball as close to pro ball as possible to better prepare me for that experience. Wood Bats would be a step in the right direction.