Article posted sourcing another article who sourced anonymous sources. Seems legit.
Article posted sourcing another article who sourced anonymous sources. Seems legit.
You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?
Of course I will.You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?
Will he ask Mueller next? I think that Trump has asked nearly everyone that he can think of to stop or impede the Trump/Russian/election collusion investigation. At least he's thorough. He didn't want to offend anyone by not asking them.
I'd say let me know when the anonymous sources get actual names attached to them.You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?
Would that be before or after Trump's impeachment proceedings?I'm of the opinion that when this is all said and done everyone that thought there was "Russian collusion" should be sent to Russia to face justice for trying to start WW3 by being liars.
Would that be before or after Trump's impeachment proceedings?
Nothing illegal was done. Since when is it illegal to ask someone to say there was no collusion when it was widely reported there was zero evidence there was? I missed the part where Trump ordered anyone to do any crime. Lots of clouds but no rain. Just keep framing the news a certain way and a lot of the low IQ crowd eats it up.