Help me out here. I have read two articles about our whistle blowing...

[saltybulldog]

Both have made the same statements. Does it read like Sydney received the improper benefits from us to anyone else?

MSU pushes their red button first.

The SEC requested specific information from Mississippi State after the notification, the statement said, but the school didn't provide that information until July because it was "dealing with ongoing and time-consuming eligibility issues involving non-football matters in the winter and spring of 2010."

This likely refers at least in part to men's basketball player Renardo Sidney, who in March was declared ineligible for the rest of his freshman season and the first nine games of his sophomore season after he was found to have accepted improper benefits to play at Mississippi State.

 

[cps36]

[No message]

 

[smootness]

That's not just misleading, it's completely incorrect. He didn't receive any benefits to play at State. None of that process dealt with us in any way, except that the suspension meant he missed games for our team.

 

[Sarc Dawg]

if they just left it at "received improper benefits."

flat out wrong is when they add "at Mississippi State."

 

[57stratdawg]

he was found to have received improper benefits. He had to sit out his freshman year while they investigated, they found something, he waws ordered to pay it back, and now has to sit out 30% of his first year full eligible.

AJ Green had to sit out 30% as well hm? 4 games? I think UNC had a couple guys face the same suspension.