Here's the proof you lefties are looking for..
- Thread starter PriddyBoy
- Start date
Libs are absolutely out of control. Never seen this before, to this extent. I believe they have always been "out there" but never to this extent. The right has its kooks, but this is now mainstream liberal thought, endorsed by a campus and faculty near you.
There was a lot of crazy stuff said about Obama but this is a lit worse. Most of it is based in illogical wishful thinking.
There was some crazy stuff about Obama mostly from far right wingers. This stuff is from main stream Dems aided by the media. I have never seen this level of dishonesty before. The media hates Trump and it is soooooooo obvious. He returns the favor. But they did not elect him and they can't take him down. Very few trust them anymore.
Trump was one of the far right wingers questioning Obama's citizenship well after everything had been released.
How much money did Trump spend in the primaries? Not much. Know why? He had constant media coverage. He's flipping out on the very people who gave him the initial exposure that let him win.
But interestingly missing from your analysis is that while Trump got enormous free coverage during the primaries, he got extraordinarily negative coverage in the general election. Once everything was on the line and a democrat running against him, things change dramatically. In fact 91% of his coverage was negative. That is not biased, that is intentional corruption.
The media concluded they desperately wanted Hillary elected. There can be no other explanation. A Skeptical person like me may conclude they wanted trump to win the primary knowing he would have no chance during the general. But, they guessed wrong.
Last edited:
Next thing you know they'll be playing tapes of Trump speeches backwards looking for back masking of subliminal white power message.
What? You aren't supposed to feed questions to a particular candidate during the Primary and General debates? Must have been Russians.
He did get a fair amount of negative coverage throughout the process, mainly based on what he was saying. He had unprecedented coverage though. He had call in access to whatever news program he wanted. That was all free exposure to his campaign though.
I think the coverage initially was about ratings. No one took him seriously as a candidate, Republican or Democrat.
91% does not happen by accident. And certainly his policy proposals did not warrant that sort of negative coverage. Hillary had more than her fair share of negative issues but received nowhere near that amount of negative coverage. Come on.
He certainly deserved negative coverage Hillary certainly deserve negative coverage but 91%?
You may want to read the book written by former CBS reporter Bernard Goldberg called "A slobbering love affair". It highlighted the media's coverage of Obama. Again, this is not bias, it is corruption.
Think about the things Trump has said. It wasn't policy for the most part. It included some extreme things, often times saying those things toward the end of the week. He'd let the media stew on it over the weekend, get coverage on all the weekend shows, then he'd walk it back on Monday. The press wasn't being negative, they were being played. He's still doing similar stuff now.
That is absolutely THE funniest thing I've ever seen.
OMG!
Priddy you rock Dude!
Unreal.
Now watch 'em (Left) go off on the deep end over it[winking]
Nice
Last edited:
They were mocking him and trying to drum him out of existence, not praising him mule_eer!
My guess is that at some point in the near future someone will mention racist hand gestures in a speech and then if they are pressed on it later some vague reference to that will be made.
lol. Aren't you the same guy that said one of the broad day organizers was an ISIS sympathizer because of her "hand signals". Classic.
I think the point Coop was why would radical Leftist Feminists even tolerate someone marching with them whose Religion so disrespects the rights of Women (genital mutilations, arranged Marriages, restrictions on sex, rape accusations, clothing, work, and even Worship) while forbidding Women who 'choose' to keep their Babies alive from marching?
Very interesting decision making on who really is for protecting Women's 'rights' and who isn't wouldn't you agree...hand signs aside?
I'm not sure what you are talking about, but get the feeling this is heading towards yet another abortion debate, so I'm just going to pass on that and go back to laughing at any, and every, person that reads in to people's "hand signals".
Not debating Abortion Coop, but if you think those Feminists who were marching out there protesting Trump were protesting anything other than their right to kill their unborn Babies through taxpayer funded convenience Abortions, you're not being intellectually honest.
What other "rights" is/was Trump advocating to take away from them?
Ironically he's not even advocating a ban on Abortion, he just thinks it ought to be settled at the State level by the people, and he's 100% against taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood (which primarily offers Abortions services, not Mammography scans)
Many on the Left Coop were mocking PAX by suggesting that really wasn't a Muslim Babe marching with those sewer mouthed Feminists right? He countered your assertion by suggesting that chick was using hand signals to at least indicate her sympathies with Isis. (many on the Left were trying to argue she wasn't)
So I asked, even without her alleged "hand signals" I do remember she was wearing a hijab, clearly she was a Muslim. Hence my question in the previous post about those radical Leftists being more willing to tolerate an avowed Muslim marching with them over a "pro-Life" choice Feminist.
Those Pro-Life Chicks were told their protest marching wasn't welcomed. Now you're trying to say that march wasn't all about Abortion?
Wrong. I mocked him because he said she was using ISIS hand signals. Much the same reason this thread was started. Try and read gooder.
Hand signals or not Coop, that Babe was a Musilm. Stick to the point I'm making, forget about the "hand signals". Why did those Radical Feminists allow her to march with them yet they told the Pro Life Babes to "go home"?
Rather than being snarky, why can't/don't you answer the question? I'd love to hear an answer from you actually.
Cause it doesn't interest me. It was never in doubt whether she was Muslim or not, it was about whether her "secret hand signals" pledged allegiance to ISIS and sharia law.
OK fine then Coop. So we know she was Muslim. We know you aren't "interested".
I'm still asking why you think those radical Feminists who were ostensibly out there protesting Trump's alleged assault on their "rights" would allow someone who sympathizes with or is a professed Muslim to march with them and tell other Feminists who are simply "pro Life" to keep away?
Were those protesters genuinely interested in protecting Women's rights or simply political hacks?
91%????? He did espouse policy positions. The Wall, immigration reform, temporary ban from terrorist countries, tax cuts, repatriation of overseas profits, jobs in American, infrastructure program, the Forgotten Man policies, etc. He certainly said incendiary things as well. But it seems that only one side of those statements were covered.
Hillary also had her own problems. The lies, deceit, Clinton Foundation, etc. She got no where near that level of negative coverage.
Are you equating the two? One seem innocuous this one seems like it is sending a message. These are not even close to being the same issue.
Women's March organizer Linda Sarsour makes Islamic State signal
Jihad Watch700 × 405Search by image
“Organizer For DC Women's March Against Trump Pictured Flashing the ISIS Sign,” by Joe Hoft, Gateway Pundit, January 23, 2017:
Visit page View image
Even more:
Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas
Cristina Laila Jan 21st, 2017 4:43 pm 640 Comments
In 2011, Linda Sarsour described shariah law as “reasonable” and implied that it’s widely misunderstood because “people just know the basics”:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
@LaRebelleFleur shariah law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics
In 2014, Linda Sarsour replied to a tweet about bans on sharia law by pointing out that such bans would apply to the implementation of sharia law in courts in any jurisdiction:
Hates Zionism:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
Nothing is creepier than Zionism.Challenge racism, #NormalizeJustice. Check out this video by @remroum
If you want to defend her, I suggest you do some research first. Her positions and interviews are all over the net. BTW, she wants a one state majority Muslim solution with Israel serving in a subservient role.
Calling for more "martyr attacks" against Israel:
Kerry Drew Disenchanted Arabs in Bay Ridge
By Sarmad S. Ali
As the presidential election grew near, Linda Sarsour sat in her small office at the Arab-American Association in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, looking at the photos of two thickly bearded young Arabs on the front page of an Arabic-language newspaper.
The paper carried fervent slogans calling on young people to become martyrs in the conflict with Israel.
Underware bomber was CIA plant:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
Underwear bomber was the #CIA all along. Why did I already know that?! Shame on us - scaring the American people.
Proudly supported Muhammad Allan, a known recruiter of suicide bombers:
Proud of our new generation of Palestinian rights activists. Free #MUHAMMADALLAN.
Last edited:
Are you equating the two? One seem innocuous this one seems like it is sending a message. These are not even close to being the same issue.
Women's March organizer Linda Sarsour makes Islamic State signal
Jihad Watch700 × 405Search by image
“Organizer For DC Women's March Against Trump Pictured Flashing the ISIS Sign,” by Joe Hoft, Gateway Pundit, January 23, 2017:
Visit page View image
Even more:
Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas
Cristina Laila Jan 21st, 2017 4:43 pm 640 Comments
In 2011, Linda Sarsour described shariah law as “reasonable” and implied that it’s widely misunderstood because “people just know the basics”:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
@LaRebelleFleur shariah law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics
In 2014, Linda Sarsour replied to a tweet about bans on sharia law by pointing out that such bans would apply to the implementation of sharia law in courts in any jurisdiction:
Hates Zionism:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
Nothing is creepier than Zionism.Challenge racism, #NormalizeJustice. Check out this video by @remroum
If you want to defend her, I suggest you do some research first. Her positions and interviews are all over the net. BTW, she wants a one state majority Muslim solution with Israel serving in a subservient role.
Coop is not being intellectually honest in this PAX trying to make fun of you pointing out her obvious "hand signals" in support of Isis comparing it to the OP "mocking" Stephen's Miller's obvious "non hand signal" conspiracy theorists.
The real issue with that Muslim Babe, was why she was allowed to March with Radical Feminists out there against Trump and their claims he's against Women's "rights".
So what "rights" for Women did this Isis sympathizing Babe support?
Check out my posts at the end of this thread. Lots more than just hand signals signifying support for ISIS. Favors parts of sharia law. Hates zionism. Wants a single state, majority muslim rule country. I could go on and on.
All anyone with a brain has to do is google her. Her positions are well known. I posted some of them. This is an absurd comparison. Innocuous holding of hands vs. blatant hand signals photographed just for that purpose.
LMAO. I agree with the OP, connecting silly dots of hand gestures is hilarious.Are you equating the two? One seem innocuous this one seems like it is sending a message. These are not even close to being the same issue.
Women's March organizer Linda Sarsour makes Islamic State signal
Jihad Watch700 × 405Search by image
“Organizer For DC Women's March Against Trump Pictured Flashing the ISIS Sign,” by Joe Hoft, Gateway Pundit, January 23, 2017:
Visit page View image
Even more:
Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas
Cristina Laila Jan 21st, 2017 4:43 pm 640 Comments
In 2011, Linda Sarsour described shariah law as “reasonable” and implied that it’s widely misunderstood because “people just know the basics”:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
@LaRebelleFleur shariah law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics
In 2014, Linda Sarsour replied to a tweet about bans on sharia law by pointing out that such bans would apply to the implementation of sharia law in courts in any jurisdiction:
Hates Zionism:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
Nothing is creepier than Zionism.Challenge racism, #NormalizeJustice. Check out this video by @remroum
If you want to defend her, I suggest you do some research first. Her positions and interviews are all over the net. BTW, she wants a one state majority Muslim solution with Israel serving in a subservient role.
Calling for more "martyr attacks" against Israel:
Kerry Drew Disenchanted Arabs in Bay Ridge
By Sarmad S. Ali
As the presidential election grew near, Linda Sarsour sat in her small office at the Arab-American Association in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, looking at the photos of two thickly bearded young Arabs on the front page of an Arabic-language newspaper.
The paper carried fervent slogans calling on young people to become martyrs in the conflict with Israel.
Underware bomber was CIA plant:
Linda SarsourVerified account@lsarsour
Underwear bomber was the #CIA all along. Why did I already know that?! Shame on us - scaring the American people.
Proudly supported Muhammad Allan, a known recruiter of suicide bombers:
Proud of our new generation of Palestinian rights activists. Free #MUHAMMADALLAN.
Did you not read about her? And if you can't see the difference between her overt hand signals and the other picture posted, then I nor anyone else can help you.
Oh I forgot, I'm a leftist because I disagree with you. Many logies. She's holding up a #1 gesture like every f'n athlete ever. Guess they are all ISIS supporters. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.
Coop takes the cake. He can't see the difference in the pictures. She is a radical Palestinian activist that hates Jews and favors much of Shari Law. She supports activists that recruit martyrs that kill innocent Israelis. She supports Hamas. And he can't see or doesn't want to see the difference.