Here's your 14th SEC team.
- Thread starter megadawgmaniac
- Start date
KU, KSU, Mizzou, TCU, Louisville, Cincy, WVU, Pitt, Iowa St, and the likes to form a conference, which would be great basketball and decent football (Memphis would jockey big time to join in this conference).The Big East is waiting to break because it is already too big with some having football and some not, plus if VA Tech comes to the SEC, the ACC could add Syracuse, UConn and South Florida to get them to 14. <div>
</div><div>
</div>
</div><div>
</div>
Shoot yeah, they're gonna blow up our town cuz we have a warehouse where they store half the inventory of thermal underpants walsmart sells any given year.<div id="">
</div><div>If a majority of K-State fans think they're getting into the SEC, they're delusional, even by SEC standards.</div>
</div><div>If a majority of K-State fans think they're getting into the SEC, they're delusional, even by SEC standards.</div>
would be greater than what T Boone would be willing to pay....<div>
</div><div>no?</div><div>
</div><div>edited for drunkness</div>
</div><div>no?</div><div>
</div><div>edited for drunkness</div>
If mizzou and aTm join.. then I would think that both Alabama and Auburn would go to the East.. If that happened, then our permanent East team is going to be Alabama instead of Kentucky. Now the argument is up in the air whether replacing Auburn with Mizzou/aTm would help/hurt us.. but regardless, I would rather have Kentucky set in stone from the East rather than Alabama, which would be the case.
K-State's President (Kirk Schultz) was Dean of Engineering at MSU in the early 2000's. His wife, Noel Schultz, was a professor in the EE department.
That being said, I don't think there's a chance in hell that KSU is the 14th team.</p>
That being said, I don't think there's a chance in hell that KSU is the 14th team.</p>
You do realize that if we added TAMU and Mizzou then we would only have to move one team to the east. That team, more than likely, being Auburn. Then our eastern division constant could still be Kentucky. So Alabama stays in the west.<div>Mullenation said:
</div><div>6 west teams + 2 additions - 1 Auburn = 7 SEC west teams</div><div>6 east teams + 1 Auburn = 7 SEC east teams</div><div>
</div>
wcrStateFan said:
I think he was meaning that both Alabama and Auburn move east and an east team (Vandy or UK) would move west. By doing this Alabama would get to keep both rivalries with AU and Tenn.
If UK came west, we would lose UK as our permanent opponent and if Vandy came west, UM would lose their permanent opponent.
The teams without a permanent opponent would be UK/MSU or UM/Vandy, aTm and Mizzou in the west and Tenn, Bama, AU, and UGA in the east