Hey Walter Brennaneer, do us a favor and stop spamming the board.

[op2]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

It’s like a Facebook spamming by the olds.

 

[atlkvb]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

Meh....it's a message board. A message board! Nothing "requires" you or anyone else on here to read whatever's posted on here. I've seen his stuff, I think some of it is hilarious myself. It certainly doesn't bother me.

I get it you think he's posting "too much" but where's the limit on how many messages are allowed on a message board? Don't like what he's posting? Skip it!

I don't read all of the drivel @moe posts on here. (and he posts a lot) Matter of fact as soon as I see "anonymous sources report" or "unnamed officials say" I usually stop reading him because I know it's nothing reliable. We used to hear the same complaints about wvu82...folks on the Left were upset over how much he was posting or where it was from (Twitter). So what?

I always thought if his stuff was so upsetting, why did anyone even bother reading it? You're as entitled to be upset over @Walter Brennaneer 's posts as he is entitled to post them! I'm pretty sure he won't be offended if you don't read him, and you'd probably do yourself a favor by just skipping past anything with his handle on it.

 

[atlkvb]

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

Here's mine. Democrats are in trouble...big trouble. Wonder how many Leftists will agree with this?

Job approval for congressional Democrats hits all-time low: ‘Flat out terrible’

excerpt:
The job approval rating for congressional Democrats has plunged to another all-time low, with fewer than 2 in 10 Americans happy with their work on Capitol Hill. Only 19% of registered voters approve of the way Democrats in Congress are handling their job, a Quinnipiac University Poll released Wednesday found. The dismal rating for congressional Dems is the lowest ever recorded by the pollster, which first began asking the question in 2009.

Hey you Leftists.....

Hey @op2 ...how many refuting posts from the Left will this generate?

 

[BeefWellington]

What an ignorant post. Confirmed by the people who liked your post. I don't see any spamming. If it's too much for you, ignore the poster. I'd rather him post a few extra topics of discussion otherwise this board is dead.

 

[BeefWellington]

It’s like a Facebook spamming by the olds.

And I would put money on you being an over 50 white guy trying to fit in.

 

[atlkvb]

What an ignorant post. Confirmed by the people who liked your post. I don't see any spamming. If it's too much for you, ignore the poster. I'd rather him post a few extra topics of discussion otherwise this board is dead.

Exactly! I log on, scan the "headlines" read what interests me, ignore the rest! If I don't like what's posted up here I log off and go read a good book. Good post here. You new to the board? You must not be on the Left, they've all run off!

 

[atlkvb]

Here 'ya go @BeefWellington ...a nice avatar for 'ya! Call it a "welcome in" gift!

Sliced and freshly baked Beef Wellington...yuuummmy!!!!!

 

[op2]

What an ignorant post. Confirmed by the people who liked your post. I don't see any spamming. If it's too much for you, ignore the poster. I'd rather him post a few extra topics of discussion otherwise this board is dead.

Maybe one reason the board is dead is because one person posts over and over with most of the posts just being links to other sites, which makes it hard for posts with content to get traction. Why should a person take the effort to compose and post a few paragraphs giving their opinion about someone only to come back a few hours later to see if anyone has answered and then see that their post is 20 deep in the list with a bunch of nonsense on top of it?

As I said in my OP, most of Walter's posts have no or few responses and it's mainly because his posts don't have substance but are just links to videos or whatever. Maybe we should have sticky thread at the top where people that want to link to a video put it there and people that want to watch videos can click on that sticky thread and watch 50 videos and instead of having 50 threads with one video each that and you have to click on each thread to get to one video.

 

[atlkvb]

Maybe one reason the board is dead is because one person posts over and over with most of the posts just being links to other sites, which makes it hard for posts with content to get traction. Why should a person take the effort to compose and post a few paragraphs giving their opinion about someone only to come back a few hours later to see if anyone has answered and then see that their post is 20 deep in the list with a bunch of nonsense on top of it?

As I said in my OP, most of Walter's posts have no or few responses and it's mainly because his posts don't have substance but are just links to videos or whatever. Maybe we should have sticky thread at the top where people that want to link to a video put it there and people that want to watch videos can click on that sticky thread and watch 50 videos and instead of having 50 threads with one video each that and you have to click on each thread to get to one video.

Did you watch any of those videos? I swear some 'em are just funny. No need to "like" or comment on 'em...they're just funny. As I said, if you're not interested in what he's posting, don't click on it. If I see 50 posts I'm bound to skip past some of 'em. I don't read everything posted on here...don't want to!

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

Looking forward to op3

 

[atlkvb]

Maybe one reason the board is dead is because one person posts over and over with most of the posts just being links to other sites,

The board isn't "dead"...it's just if you're on the Left, all you have to read is this guy...

Hi...I'm @moe....and I'm miserable

Poor guy...all his Leftist friends have run off from the OT forum.

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

The board isn't "dead"...it's just if you're on the Left, all you have to read is this guy...

Hi...I'm @moe....and I'm miserable

Poor guy...all his Leftist friends have run off from the OT forum.

op2 in mourning

 

[atlkvb]

View attachment 848850
op2 in mourning

I love watching the Left's "propaganda" vehicles being mothballed! When they cut off funding to PBS I was like.....

...and I was like

even Obama was like.....

...and when they cut off that bogus USAID funding.....

...more please...

I'm not done atl....

work it DJT!

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

And I would put money on you being an over 50 white guy trying to fit in.

And you’d lose that bet.

 

[Gunny46]

Here I will make this thread more interesting.






DON'T MISS THIS: The single most important moment of transparency in US Government history... The Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just declassified proof of treason by President Obama. I have never in my life seen the Intelligence Community declassify proof of their own crimes against the American people. The evidence is astonishing: - U.S. intel admitted Russia did NOT hack the 2016 election - Obama pushed the Russia hoax to sabotage Trump - The Steele dossier was fake, but Comey used it anyway - Brennan and Clapper entrenched the hoax deep into the Intel Community and punished whistleblowers - Corporate media was used to launder fake government propaganda relentlessly - The Russia probe was an insurrectionist plan to take down Trump They knew Russia didn’t interfere in the election, yet they fabricated intelligence to justify a years-long effort to overthrow Trump. This was a deliberate campaign of treason aimed at removing a legitimately elected president. The treason is exposed. We have the names. Now it’s time to hold them accountable.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Gunny46]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

The Blue Lot looks like it's not getting very many responses either. My advice would be to send a personal email to everyone who had a subscription on the old board and invite them here. Let them know they are missed. Maybe not attack a popular President on that board or discuss politics there. People can read between the lines and are smarter than many think. That's why the MSM is failing and losing subscriptions.

Just some random thoughts. So If you run Walter off then there's nothing to read. That's even more boring?

 

[op2]

The Blue Lot looks like it's not getting very many responses either. My advice would be to send a personal email to everyone who had a subscription on the old board and invite them here. Let them know they are missed. Maybe not attack a popular President on that board or discuss politics there. People can read between the lines and are smarter than many think. That's why the MSM is failing and losing subscriptions.

Just some random thoughts. So If you run Walter off then there's nothing to read. That's even more boring?

I agree 100% with this part.

"People can read between the lines and are smarter than many think. That's why the MSM is failing and losing subscriptions."

 

[op2]

View attachment 848850
op2 in mourning

This post is a good example of nonsense posts. First of all, I'm not a fan of Colbert or in general how the Left has gone crazy the last ten years and that's clear to anyone that had read the board, but instead since I'm saying I don't like your posts, I'm automatically The Other Side. That kind of approach is silly and pointless.

Secondly, suppose for a minute that I was a big Colbert fan. What exactly is the point of a post that is solely basically "Ha ha, your guy got cancelled?" Why not a more substantive post pointing out how Colbert being cancelled is an example of how the big media companies are losing control to independent users on the Internet and how Colbert alienating half his potential audience by being so politically one-sided is foolish, etc?

And a dash of "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" would be acceptable too. But when the whole is "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" then it's just pointless and childish.

How about this. According to what I read, the Colbert show cost $100 M per year to produce and was losing $40 M per year. Colbert's salary was $15 M per year, so even if Colbert did the show for free it'd be losing $25 M per year. That's interesting information, to me at least.

 

[Gunny46]

I agree 100% with this part.

"People can read between the lines and are smarter than many think. That's why the MSM is failing and losing subscriptions."

This post is a good example of nonsense posts. First of all, I'm not a fan of Colbert or in general how the Left has gone crazy the last ten years and that's clear to anyone that had read the board, but instead since I'm saying I don't like your posts, I'm automatically The Other Side. That kind of approach is silly and pointless.

Secondly, suppose for a minute that I was a big Colbert fan. What exactly is the point of a post that is solely basically "Ha ha, your guy got cancelled?" Why not a more substantive post pointing out how Colbert being cancelled is an example of how the big media companies are losing control to independent users on the Internet and how Colbert alienating half his potential audience by being so politically one-sided is foolish, etc?

And a dash of "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" would be acceptable too. But when the whole is "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" then it's just pointless and childish.

How about this. According to what I read, the Colbert show cost $100 M per year to produce and was losing $40 M per year. Colbert's salary was $15 M per year, so even if Colbert did the show for free it'd be losing $25 M per year. That's interesting information, to me at least.

Maybe they should have produced a better product. Then they wouldn't be losing so much money. Constantly attacking Trump and over half the Country definitely has proven to be a bad buisness model.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Maybe they should have produced a better product. Then they wouldn't be losing so much money. Constantly attacking Trump and over half the Country definitely has proven to be a bad buisness model.

I think we can all agree with that.

 

[Gunny46]

I think we can all agree with that.

I think the personal emails I recommend would be time consuming. But I would do it anyways. People don't like to be taken for granted. Mass notification invites aren't personal. Just my two cents if the Moderators wants to consider it.

 

[BeefWellington]

And you’d lose that bet.

Lol yeah oook.

 

[roadtrasheer]

This post is a good example of nonsense posts. First of all, I'm not a fan of Colbert or in general how the Left has gone crazy the last ten years and that's clear to anyone that had read the board, but instead since I'm saying I don't like your posts, I'm automatically The Other Side. That kind of approach is silly and pointless.

Secondly, suppose for a minute that I was a big Colbert fan. What exactly is the point of a post that is solely basically "Ha ha, your guy got cancelled?" Why not a more substantive post pointing out how Colbert being cancelled is an example of how the big media companies are losing control to independent users on the Internet and how Colbert alienating half his potential audience by being so politically one-sided is foolish, etc?

And a dash of "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" would be acceptable too. But when the whole is "ha ha, your guy got cancelled" then it's just pointless and childish.

How about this. According to what I read, the Colbert show cost $100 M per year to produce and was losing $40 M per year. Colbert's salary was $15 M per year, so even if Colbert did the show for free it'd be losing $25 M per year. That's interesting information, to me at least.

100 M a year to produce just blows my mind . What kind of idiots can burn 100M and produce a failure?

 

[op2]

100 M a year to produce just blows my mind . What kind of idiots can burn 100M and produce a failure?

I think it gets to the point of why the Internet is kicking legacy media's ***. When people can make something themselves and put it on the Internet without having to go through corporate BS and having to please (or making sure they don't offend) a hundred people along the way it comes out so much better and so much cheaper.

The fact that it costs $100 M per year actually makes it worse. If CBS made them cut the cost in half the show would probably be better (or less bad). I'm not sure why they didn't just do that. I mean, the 11:30 pm time slot will still exist and something is going to have to go on there anyway. It'll be interesting to see what they put on after Colbert is gone.

 

[roadtrasheer]

I think it gets to the point of why the Internet is kicking legacy media's ***. When people can make something themselves and put it on the Internet without having to go through corporate BS and having to please (or making sure they don't offend) a hundred people along the way it comes out so much better and so much cheaper.

The fact that it costs $100 M per year actually makes it worse. If CBS made them cut the cost in half the show would probably be better (or less bad). I'm not sure why they didn't just do that. I mean, the 11:30 pm time slot will still exist and something is going to have to go on there anyway. It'll be interesting to see what they put on after Colbert is gone.

Its crazy!

 

[atlkvb]

I'm thrilled @moe is pissed.

 

[WVUALLEN]

There are 50 threads on the first page before I write this and you started 37 of them. And 29 of those have zero responses. And six more have only one or two responses. And most of the your posts are just link to articles or videos from elsewhere rather than you taking the time to form a thought and writing it down. It's boring, unoriginal and on top of that apparently not very interesting since you get so few responses.

Think of something your interested in, write it down in a post, go do something else for awhile, then come back and see if anyone responded.

Now that we know your triggers are Trump, and too many threads started by one individual not named @moe We may now begin.

 

[BigBalls]

Walter is an outstanding poster.

More Walter/Less op2

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

Walter is an outstanding poster.

More Walter/Less op2

I agree with your post.