Unreal.
Helping put UK on the sidelines is good to a lot of people out there.Amazing that someone so bad gets rewarded like that.
Unreal.
They are supposed to be graded on their performance during the tournament and advanced based on their grades. The grading committee consisted of Roy Williams, John Skipper and Mark Emmert.There is obviously a criteria, known only to the referee community, being used to determine who advances.
They are supposed to be graded on their performance during the tournament and advanced based on their grades. The grading committee consisted of Roy Williams, John Skipper and Mark Emmert.
The NCAA does not care they think he is one of their best.Unreal.
Not an official member but she does grade the papers.Deb Crowder must be on that committee, too.
Had we somehow won yesterday, he'd almost 100% be on our game. In fact, he'll still be on UNC's game, I'm sure.
One thing I'd love to see one day are the metrics their bosses use for job reviews and placement in the game's biggest event. Somehow I don't think such metrics exist.
Nope. My "question" was somewhat rhetorical as I know there are no "metrics". They just pick the guy who probably gets the most complaints from coaches.It's not metrics at all.
Nope. My "question" was somewhat rhetorical as I know there are no "metrics". They just pick the guy who probably gets the most complaints from coaches.
Me too. I woke up several times last night dreaming about that game, and then spent an hour awake from 3-4 am running all of the possible scenarios through my head. What a mess...this is day 1 of usually about a week-long "WTF" that I think we all have to go through after such a tough loss for our Cats....ugh.Oh, ok. Gotcha! Sorry, my brain is t quite working normally yet. Usually takes me a few days to get back on track. That one really stung yesterday.
Maybe this is a remake of The Sting and Roy is going to get hosed in the final.Unreal.