Holy hell, who freaked out on the Clark post by Veazey?

saltybulldog

Redshirt
Nov 15, 2005
1,395
1
32
Half the posts have been removed. I see Shmuley was one of the offenders. I am sure GP's band of homos are all in a fit.
 

saltybulldog

Redshirt
Nov 15, 2005
1,395
1
32
he must be on on the juice. We may need to implement some random screening for performance enhancement.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,981
1,765
113
He posted something about Veazey reporting this and how the JEaniie Weenies would be mad. He then posed some rhetorical questions like how dare he report this and things like that. They were CLEARLY in a mocking fashion. However, at least the next two posters thought he was giving KV a hard time. In fact what he was doing was ripping on the idiots who call Kyle's integrity into question on GP.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,058
25,089
113
Why else would he have posted a blog entry about Clark being arrested for petit larceny?</p>
 

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,734
10,368
113
I will now try to recreate said offensive offering as best I can:

"uh-oh, squeezy, you've gone and done it now. You're going to have the sheeple populating Jeanie Weenie's page up in arms. How dare you intentionally impugn MBanner by reporting facts about the arrest of a Mississippi State football player. Everyone knows that the illegal acts of members of the football team are not the problem. It is your reporting of those facts that is the problem."

Something like that.

I think it was pretty benign. Apparently referring to ****** ***'s page as "Jeanie Weenie's" is a violation of the CL's "terms of use" [in addition to being childish as hell].
 

DovaDawg

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
595
0
11
Shmuley said:
I will now try to recreate said offensive offering as best I can:

"uh-oh, squeezy, you've gone and done it now. You're going to have the sheeple populating Jeanie Weenie's page up in arms. How dare you intentionally impugn MBanner by reporting facts about the arrest of a Mississippi State football player. Everyone knows that the illegal acts of members of the football team are not the problem. It is your reporting of those facts that is the problem."

Something like that.

I think it was pretty benign. Apparently referring to ****** ***'s page as "Jeanie Weenie's" is a violation of the CL's "terms of use" [in addition to being childish as hell].

The next poster was a UM fan and made a comment about MSU fans being paranoid and that we always thought the CL was out to get us. Something along the lines of our real problem was not the CL but that we did not have an OL and that we were Mississippi State and being that was bad enough. The UM poster thought he was so whitty and completely missed the point that Shmuley was being sarcastic. A bunch of people proceeded to screw with the jackass and the post were deleted.