How did Johnson look in the scrimmage today?

Oldtrainer_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 12, 2008
3,594
1,198
0
But, I will say that I'm really impressed with Gran and Hinshaw and I do think that whomever wins the job will be much better prepared to be successful. It is a shame that Towles didn't get the opportunity to learn under these two. I was very impressed with Gran's interview today. No smartass remarks that Dawson would give all the time last year. Straight forward football 101.

Me also. Former Grambling coach Doug Williams was impressed with Johnson arm strength and work ethic. lmmediately after taking jobs new CATS offensive coaches went after Stephen Johnson!
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Johnson is a perfect counter to Drew. If Drew is struggling Johnson brings in another dimension. How many times has a QB shift sunk UK, especially if the new guy is a dual threat QB? I can't remember.

Besides maybe Cobb, have we ever had a backup QB come in and play better then the starter?
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
Do we have the same coaches?

Don't you think the coaches have a lot more riding on the games than the players, at least money wise? I don't buy it that coaches that have their careers riding on winning aren't going to play the players that give them the best chance to win. How unfair would that be to the other players, and aren't most coaches pretty competitive to start with?

So what if the coaches didn't play the right player last year, different coaches, and who knows that IF they made the wrong choice it was on purpose------I don't think so.

Besides, if you are worried about them playing the QB with the most experience wouldn't that be Johnson, different level yes, but much more actual game playing experience.

I will leave it up to the coaches and not gripe about it before either one of our QBs play a down.


We saw Towles stumble and fall for two seasons and Barker only got a call when not to have done so would have been the height of ignorance. When he did finally get a shot he was poorly prepared and looked no better or even worse than Towles. That stands out in my mind as indecision in coaching or a unexposed weakness in the second qb. Now, to read reports, the previous second qb is being given the same build up that Towles received and the number two guy seems to be an afterthought plus the open competition touted was over before it began.

So am I griping? Not yet but it's pretty obvious that Barker has already been given the starting role since the beginning. No problem with that. However it has the potential to be a Towles/Barker repeat performance. The only legitimate coaching reason for that is when Barker is so superior to Johnson that Johnson doesn't deserve the snaps not indecision by the coaches. Saw it happen last year and who's to say it can't happen again?

Now I too have confidence in the staff's desire to win every game but with the pressure to win every game possible, with a marginal team, sometimes can cause a vapor lock of the best minds. Whether you're acting too soon or too slow at game speed, with this team, may just be a matter of a willingness to gamble. Gambling coaches don't sleep well at night.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTick2

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
Just adding this as an historical observation. There are those who say it took several years for UK football recruiting to fully recover in Western Kentucky after the Billy Jack Haskins - Tim Couch saga in 1997. I'm not here to argue that Couch was not the better QB under Mumme's scheme. What's done is done and is reflected in the record. But the transition was not handled with the greatest of diplomacy. I'm not sure if the linebacker who transferred with Haskins was in sympathy or just a coincidence. So, IMO it will be Barker's position to lose, as it should be.
??? If you are saying Barker's situation has any relationship at all to Couch and Haskins, that doesn't register on the realism scale. And as for the way it was handled, neither Bill Curry nor Hal Mumme was ever known for diplomacy. But if you are saying Barker stays #1 as long as he moves the chains and puts points on the scoreboard, then you have hit the nail on the head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levibooty

KapitalCat

Heisman
May 21, 2002
84,586
56,806
102
Eddie Gran and Darrin Hinshaw are in charge and they know what they are doing. Johnson is behind Barker for a lot of reasons. One is that he came in here at less than 170 pounds, he needs to get stronger. My understanding is that is happening. Drew has been really good this spring and Johnson is having to catch up in terms of the speed of the game. It's going to take more time. The QB position is not going to be handed to anyone. Gran doesn't work that way. In practice both guys get reps with the ones. But over the past week Drew has geared it up another notch. Today he's clearly the guy because he's clearly the guy. It's not that complicated.

I believe they will have packages for Johnson. He will get reps in games. It won't be like the cluster created by Dawson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue832

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
We saw Towles stumble and fall for two seasons and Barker only got a call when not to have done so would have been the height of ignorance. When he did finally get a shot he was poorly prepared and looked no better or even worse than Towles. That stands out in my mind as indecision in coaching or a unexposed weakness in the second qb. Now, to read reports, the previous second qb is being given the same build up that Towles received and the number two guy seems to be an afterthought plus the open competition touted was over before it began.

So am I griping? Not yet but it's pretty obvious that Barker has already been given the starting role since the beginning. No problem with that. However it has the potential to be a Towles/Barker repeat performance. The only legitimate coaching reason for that is when Barker is so superior to Johnson that Johnson doesn't deserve the snaps not indecision by the coaches. Saw it happen last year and who's to say it can't happen again?

Now I too have confidence in the staff's desire to win every game but with the pressure to win every game possible, with a marginal team, sometimes can cause a vapor lock of the best minds. Whether you're acting too soon or too slow at game speed, with this team, may just be a matter of a willingness to gamble. Gambling coaches don't sleep well at night.
Did you attend our games in November? Let's tell it like it was. Barker was awful. All the beginner mistakes were on display. Almost always locked onto his 1st receiver. Couldn't read the secondary or the blitz. Saw the rush. Couldn't get the ball out. For all of Towles' troubles, he didn't play as poorly as Barker played. Anyone who says otherwise wasn't there, or else doesn't understand. Maybe Towles and Barker were so poorly prepared by Shannon Dawson that neither should be judged by last year's performance. Coach Hinshaw suggested as much when he criticized Barker's footwork at the beginning of spring practice. This would explain why Towles played well after studying with Donny Walker, then deteriorated under Dawson's influence. I was critical of Stoops in 2013 because he didn't hire a position coach for our young quarterbacks right off the bat. Hinshaw is bound to help Barker. The change to a pro style offense and improvement of the offensive line will help. Since Stoops got here, our quarterbacks have taken more sacks and hurries than any other SEC team. So there was no way to develop a consistent passing game with young quarterbacks. Give Barker time to set his feet in the pocket, give him a competent quarterback coach, then maybe good things will happen. But if they don't, then we will see Johnson. If someone can't move the chains, the program cannot succeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theoledog

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
Did you attend our games in November? Let's tell it like it was. Barker was awful. All the beginner mistakes were on display. Almost always locked onto his 1st receiver. Couldn't read the secondary or the blitz. Saw the rush. Couldn't get the ball out. For all of Towles' troubles, he didn't play as poorly as Barker played. Anyone who says otherwise wasn't there, or else doesn't understand. Maybe Towles and Barker were so poorly prepared by Shannon Dawson that neither should be judged by last year's performance. Coach Hinshaw suggested as much when he criticized Barker's footwork at the beginning of spring practice. This would explain why Towles played well after studying with Donny Walker, then deteriorated under Dawson's influence. I was critical of Stoops in 2013 because he didn't hire a position coach for our young quarterbacks right off the bat. Hinshaw is bound to help Barker. The change to a pro style offense and improvement of the offensive line will help. Since Stoops got here, our quarterbacks have taken more sacks and hurries than any other SEC team. So there was no way to develop a consistent passing game with young quarterbacks. Give Barker time to set his feet in the pocket, give him a competent quarterback coach, then maybe good things will happen. But if they don't, then we will see Johnson. If someone can't move the chains, the program cannot succeed.
This is the way I saw it also,when you add the fact that Dawson wouldn't let Towles run(taking away a strong part of his game) yet he was still the best QB of the two then it is little wonder that the offense was a cluster from mid season to the end of the season.

Barker should be(and hopefully is) the best option right now.If he is not then we have a big problem. Maybe Mattingley gets into the mix or Johnson gains weight and gets up to speed and makes a push. Based on what we know and think we know I believe the QB position will be in better hands and handled better than it was last year.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
I'm not convinced Tom Brady would have been effective at QB for Kentucky at the end of the season last year. I do think the spring game will be preliminary glance at what we may see as far as changes and personnel possibilities for next years team. Trying to predict what will unfold next year for this team at this time is simply futile.
 

Glenn Fohr

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2003
5,787
1,299
0
You guys provide the best discussions. I love this board!! Any time I post a topic I get great feedback and true blue opinions. Love it!!! Go CATS!!!!
 

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,497
10,966
113
Johnson is a perfect counter to Drew. If Drew is struggling Johnson brings in another dimension. How many times has a QB shift sunk UK, especially if the new guy is a dual threat QB? I can't remember.
New guy isn't really a dual-threat guy. At all actually.

He's a passer first. He's better on his feet than DB, but that doesn't make him a dual threat guy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Schwump

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
New guy isn't really a dual-threat guy. At all actually.

He's a passer first. He's better on his feet than DB, but that doesn't make him a dual threat guy.

I'm afraid some are expecting to see a Dobbs or Jackson with the addition of Johnson. I've mentioned several times that those guys are runners first who can throw a little but not great. Johnson is a throw first guy who can run a little. If people think they're going to see a true dual threat guy in Johnson they're going to be disappointed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntuk

RV

Heisman
Jun 26, 2005
8,089
13,585
0
Barker began the scrimmage time with the ones today but Johnson also got some time with the ones vs the ones as well. That should answer the previous question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VikingsCat

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
I'm afraid some are expecting to see a Dobbs or Jackson with the addition of Johnson. I've mentioned several times that those guys are runners first who can throw a little but not great. Johnson is a throw first guy who can run a little. If people think they're going to see a true dual threat guy in Johnson they're going to be disappointed.
There is a reason why Johnson's other offers were Arkansas St., Eastern Michigan, Lamar. I'm not saying he can't make some plays for us. Coach Hinshaw picked him, and Coach knows what he is doing when it comes to evaluation. But even if everything goes right for him, Johnson is probably a year of development away from being able to lead an SEC pro style offense up and down the field and put significant points up on the board. Johnson is insurance in case Barker plays like he played in November. Hinshaw may be more comfortable with Barker now, but he could not possibly have been very comfortable with Barker when he and Gran arrived in Lexington in January. That's why Johnson is here.
 

Bigbluecaleb

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2006
2,122
2,820
0
I think most would be surprised if Johnson was the starter vs Southern Miss. Drew has put in his time here and deserves a shot to prove himself before the staff moves on to the new guy. What you said didn't answer my post though. You came into the thread writing Johnson off as complete non-threat to play unless Barker is injured. We just took him because he was the best of the pile of crap that was left at the end of the recruiting cycle. Did you watch the 12 minute Hudl I posted? That was only half of his season last year. What did you find that didn't match the scouting report I posted? I want your expert analysis
b
 

Bigbluecaleb

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2006
2,122
2,820
0
not a knock against Johnson . . . the highlight reel looks good . . . appears he has a good O-line . . . but that is JUCO football . . . if he is the starter I will support him . . . but if he can beat Drew out then we are in big trouble and Drew must be the most overrated QB ever!!! I am glad Johnson is here . . . hope he can help us if and when needed . . . but as I said before, this is Drew's team . . . the chances of Johnson beating him out to begin the season is slim and none . . . and slim just left town!!! GBB
 

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,497
10,966
113
not a knock against Johnson . . . the highlight reel looks good . . . appears he has a good O-line . . . but that is JUCO football . . . if he is the starter I will support him . . . but if he can beat Drew out then we are in big trouble and Drew must be the most overrated QB ever!!! I am glad Johnson is here . . . hope he can help us if and when needed . . . but as I said before, this is Drew's team . . . the chances of Johnson beating him out to begin the season is slim and none . . . and slim just left town!!! GBB
I went to the open practice and saw for my own eyes....Johnson is pretty good man. Good arm. Accurate. Throws a good, catchable ball.

That particular day I felt he held onto the ball too long and thought that was the difference between he and Barker that particular day.

Thought Barker looked really good that day keep in mind.

Johnson, once he adjusts to speed, and learns how to go about things at this level could be a pretty good QB for us.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,878
60,210
113
There is a reason why Johnson's other offers were Arkansas St., Eastern Michigan, Lamar. I'm not saying he can't make some plays for us. Coach Hinshaw picked him, and Coach knows what he is doing when it comes to evaluation. But even if everything goes right for him, Johnson is probably a year of development away from being able to lead an SEC pro style offense up and down the field and put significant points up on the board. Johnson is insurance in case Barker plays like he played in November. Hinshaw may be more comfortable with Barker now, but he could not possibly have been very comfortable with Barker when he and Gran arrived in Lexington in January. That's why Johnson is here.

Yes, coach can evaluate. So, other offers mean squat.
 

optimus-blue

All-American
Oct 17, 2007
8,645
9,953
0
Johnson is not a answer at QB if the scrimmage was any indication Sat but it was only one scrimmage.
 

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
Yes, coach can evaluate. So, other offers mean squat.
Offer sheets are actually very important. Much more important than stars, in fact. But Gran and Hinshaw arrived at Kentucky in January. By that time, most of the impact level quarterback prospects in Kentucky's recruiting territory had already committed somewhere else. Coach Hinshaw identified the quarterbacks who were available, studied film, talked with other coaches, and decided to offer Steve Johnson. At the time, Johnson was the best available quarterback who fit Eddie Gran's offense and Hinshaw's requirements. That doesn't mean that an offer sheet of Lamar, Morgan State, Eastern Michigan, and Arkansas State isn't telling us something about Steve Johnson. Johnson didn't have a single offer from a significant program. Prospects sometimes fly under the radar, but we are not talking about Tom Brady here. That doesn't mean that Johnson can't make some plays for us. In a pinch, he could. But he needs a year of development to get bigger and stronger. Gran is heavily counting on Drew Barker. There shouldn't be any mistake about that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Levibooty

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,878
60,210
113
Truth is you really don't know who you are talking about because you have not seen him play much and you cannot evaluate his potential. Not meant as a slam. Just the truth for most who post here. But, the fact that you post a great deal as if what I just posted is not true, well that sucks.
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
They needed a better option than Hoak or Mattingly besides Barker for 2016. That was scary. How much better an option Johnson is can be argued forever & won't change a thing. But it's clear he's at least #2.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
I think Blue Decade makes a fair point that Gran and Hinshaw got here late in the recruiting process and basically took what they thought was best of the prospects left. That doesn't mean Johnson can't one become a very good QB but it would be quite lucky for us to have stumbled onto a really good college QB late in the season when all the other power 5 conference teams had missed him. Of course it is pre-season at Kentucky so we probably have three future all-American QB's on the bench that the rest of the world doesn't know about.
 

Bluetick2100

All-Conference
Apr 15, 2007
5,640
3,650
113
If the O-Line plays like it did last season all this QB discussion means nothing. Regardless who is behind center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shutzhund

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,878
60,210
113
I think Blue Decade makes a fair point that Gran and Hinshaw got here late in the recruiting process and basically took what they thought was best of the prospects left. That doesn't mean Johnson can't one become a very good QB but it would be quite lucky for us to have stumbled onto a really good college QB late in the season when all the other power 5 conference teams had missed him. Of course it is pre-season at Kentucky so we probably have three future all-American QB's on the bench that the rest of the world doesn't know about.

The first part is fair. Saying someone is not Tom Brady or Drew Brees or some other under the radar QB who became special is ridiculous. He, we, just don't know. Give the kid time to be coached and to grow into the position before closing that door. Sure, who else offered is often significant, but never is when the player blossoms into something unexpected. So, stop with all the pretend analysis and wait.
 

CATFANFOLIFE87

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
17,710
22,416
0
Offer sheets are actually very important. Much more important than stars, in fact. But Gran and Hinshaw arrived at Kentucky in January. By that time, most of the impact level quarterback prospects in Kentucky's recruiting territory had already committed somewhere else. Coach Hinshaw identified the quarterbacks who were available, studied film, talked with other coaches, and decided to offer Steve Johnson. At the time, Johnson was the best available quarterback who fit Eddie Gran's offense and Hinshaw's requirements. That doesn't mean that an offer sheet of Lamar, Morgan State, Eastern Michigan, and Arkansas State isn't telling us something about Steve Johnson. Johnson didn't have a single offer from a significant program. Prospects sometimes fly under the radar, but we are not talking about Tom Brady here. That doesn't mean that Johnson can't make some plays for us. In a pinch, he could. But he needs a year of development to get bigger and stronger. Gran is heavily counting on Drew Barker. There shouldn't be any mistake about that.
JUCO QBs are almost always very lightly recruited especially when they only have 2 to play 2. Most teams have 4-5 scholarship QBs and the upperclassmen have been in the OC's system for years. That makes it very unlikely for a JUCO QB to get major offers especially if they don't have a RS year to adjust and learn the offense. Our situation is rare because not only are we short on QBs we are bringing in a new offensive system so all of the QBs are starting at the same point learning the offense. Our situation is one that you don't see often so it makes it very difficult for a JUCO QB to get the same attention that a DL would get. The offer list doesn't carry near the same weight for a JUCO QBas a HS QB
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
I'm afraid some are expecting to see a Dobbs or Jackson with the addition of Johnson. I've mentioned several times that those guys are runners first who can throw a little but not great. Johnson is a throw first guy who can run a little. If people think they're going to see a true dual threat guy in Johnson they're going to be disappointed.


Put me on the disappointed side. Don't think UK will ever consistently attract the great offensive lines that pocket passers need.
 

Bluetick2100

All-Conference
Apr 15, 2007
5,640
3,650
113
True - but irrelevant as there's no reason to expect such.
Don't tell me let me guess, we are a year older, hence they will automatically be better.
Same theory as last year at this time, and you see how that worked out.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
The first part is fair. Saying someone is not Tom Brady or Drew Brees or some other under the radar QB who became special is ridiculous. He, we, just don't know. Give the kid time to be coached and to grow into the position before closing that door. Sure, who else offered is often significant, but never is when the player blossoms into something unexpected. So, stop with all the pretend analysis and wait.
You make good points too CC but if you are relegated to guessing as we are, then valuing the opinions of people who have to guess for a living and are successful most of the time i.e. the coaches of winning programs does seem to me to carry weight. I think that is all Blue Decade is saying.
 

TeoJ

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
24,355
20,374
65
Put me on the disappointed side. Don't think UK will ever consistently attract the great offensive lines that pocket passers need.


If we get Wills,that would be two five stars and about four or five four stars.That would star wise match up with about anyone.