I say reps are helped no matter the nominee and Hillary is hurt.
C CAJUNEER_rivals New member May 29, 2001 45,543 44 0 Mar 7, 2016 #1 I say reps are helped no matter the nominee and Hillary is hurt.
W WVUBRU New member Aug 7, 2001 24,731 62 0 Mar 7, 2016 #2 CAJUNEER said: I say reps are helped no matter the nominee and Hillary is hurt. Click to expand... I fully disagree.
CAJUNEER said: I say reps are helped no matter the nominee and Hillary is hurt. Click to expand... I fully disagree.
T ThatNehlenFeelin Well-known member Jan 15, 2011 49,828 844 113 Mar 7, 2016 #4 Bloomberg could fund negative ads against everyone
M MikeRafone New member Oct 5, 2011 4,238 53 0 Mar 7, 2016 #5 I ain't votin' for anyone who hates sodey pop.
M Mntneer New member Oct 7, 2001 438,167 196 0 Mar 7, 2016 #6 Bloomberg entering only hurts Bloomberg. The epitome of the Nanny Politician. He'd be easy to run against in a national election. I'd say it's 99% certain that it's going to be Trump v Clinton.
Bloomberg entering only hurts Bloomberg. The epitome of the Nanny Politician. He'd be easy to run against in a national election. I'd say it's 99% certain that it's going to be Trump v Clinton.
C CAJUNEER_rivals New member May 29, 2001 45,543 44 0 Mar 8, 2016 #7 WVUBRU said: I fully disagree. Click to expand... NYT agreed with me, but moot point as was mentions since Bloomberg isn't running.
WVUBRU said: I fully disagree. Click to expand... NYT agreed with me, but moot point as was mentions since Bloomberg isn't running.