saltslugs said:
http://swishscout.com/?p=3294&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
<div>
</div><div>As far as Kodi and Riek are concerned, it's definitely possible, but highly unlikely. Kodi, the chowderhead himeslef, said that he never expected to even be here for his senior year. I'd put the chances as:</div><div>
</div><div>Sidney: 80%</div><div>Moultrie: 50%</div><div>Bost: 40%</div><div>Johnson: 30% (great jumpshooters will always be in demand)</div><div>Augustus: 5%</div><div>Reik: 5%</div><div>
</div><div>
</div>
Riek, at present time, has no chance of making a roster. Campbell has been in the DLeague for half a decade now and putting up numbers that are WAY better than anything he ever came close to doing at State, and he has yet to get past a training camp. And Campbell at MSU is WAY better than Riek, at least so far. That pains me to say, since i have always held Campbell up as being the worst rotation big man of Stans' tenure and here i am actually saying he isnt totally Fing terrible for once.
Augusts doesnt play D and does absolutely nothing to seperate himself from about 200 other forwards. He isnt a great outside shooter, he isnt a great point-forward that can initiate a half court set when the fast break he starts doenst materialize, he isnt a good defender, he isnt a prolific rebounder, he isnt a great scorer. Really, what in his game would seperate him from hundreds of others?
Johnson is not a great jump shooter. He is a streaky one...which means he is an inconsistent one. Those arent always in high demand in the NBA, especially ones that have no interest in playing any defense at all or taking contact on either end of the court.
Bost has a 40% chance of making an NBA roster? Lets try 10%. He is quick...that is all he has going for himself versus hundreds of combo guards that will be fighting for the same spot on a roster. He doesnt have a great jumpshot, his ability to get to the lane and finish is good but its by no means elite when compared to a disgustingly high number of other available guards, his defense is decent when he wants it to be but nothing special, and his decision making is not a strong point.
Yep, that just screams 40% chance of making the roster of one of the best teams in the world.
Sidney and Moultrie i will agree with only because there is potential with Sidney and what i have read on Moultrie shows he has skills and potential. I would say 60% for Sidney and 50% for Moultrie.
Did you even read the ]<font size="5">11 Ravern Johnson (Mississippi State)</font>[/i]</span></address><address><span style="FONT-STYLE: normal"><font size="5">
Ravern has emerged as one of the NCAA’s great scorers this season, and his size and shooting help his case in the NBA. He struggles as a defender at this point, but the payoff from his game is on offense. Should be a second rounder who makes a team because of his physicality and scoring mentality.
</font><font size="3">What the F?!?! This was apparently just written too. He has emerged as one of the NCAA's great scorers? Really? He started off hot, but the month of December was pretty ****** for him.
He is 22 for 74 from deep since December. That is a scorching 29.7% from deep.
He is 48 for 136 overall...which is a blistering 35% overall from the field.
So the 1 thing this guy is known for, shooting, he is doing terribly at. Awful. He has no other redeemable qualities to an NBA team. He cant defend, he cant lead, he cant rebound. He is a scorer. That is his ability. And he is scoring at an inefficient 35% overall and 29% from deep.
And this writeup claims he will be sought after for his physicality?!?! Ravern??? Do they mean athleticism? Hope so, because he hates to mix it up and get dirty. If he were a physical player he would actually get down and defend or rebound.</font></span></address>