Yet another thread about the team and tournament that you just declared in another thread that you're happy not to hear about anymore ??
what gives?
gave us far and away the best 14 seed. put us in the east, far and away the toughest region
seems like this every year
I thought last years bracket was very favorable and we ended up in the sweet 16 something that wasn't expected by allot of people. Did you expect to play Boston College caliber teams in the Ncaa Tourney?
As the top rated 3 seed we should have been able to beat the top rated 14 seed, or the top rated 13 seed, or the top rated 12 seed. Splitting hairs. We stunk it up. End of story. People were also posting we had an EASY path to the elite 8 and you yourself boldly predicted ND would beat SFA by 30.ha. we drew a very good maryland in the 2nd round and undefeated kentucky in the sweet 16.
as the top 3 seed, we should have gotten the lowest rated (rpi) 14... not the highest. and the east region is brutally tough
ha. we drew a very good maryland in the 2nd round and undefeated kentucky in the sweet 16.
as the top 3 seed, we should have gotten the lowest rated (rpi) 14... not the highest. and the east region is brutally tough
i'm moved on from the loss. just saying the committee always makes it hard on huggy. and i'm right. heck in 2010, we should have been a 1. instead, they put us in the john wall region. it worked out. but huggs gets no favors.
i dont know...
Yet you keep expressing opinions as if they were facts...
Michigan State's spot looked even better.i dont know. i would have liked duke's spot a lot more. bet you would too
i'm moved on from the loss. just saying the committee always makes it hard on huggy. and i'm right. heck in 2010, we should have been a 1. instead, they put us in the john wall region. it worked out. but huggs gets no favors.
Hello Pot. My name is Kettle.Yet you keep expressing opinions as if they were facts...
We would have lost to Holy Cross judging by the way we played Friday night. Some of you guys are huge pussies. We earned the loss because we didn't show up ready to play, and it has nothing to do with the draw. We would be playing a 7 seed with an Elite 8 birth on the line but we **** the bed, plain and simple.
We would have been in Brooklyn or Providence no matter if we were a 2 or a 3. Top seeds get located near home. Oklahoma would be in Ok City no matter if they were a 2 or a 3.SFA was no way a 14. Like I wrote before, they were ranked 30/33; ranked higher than probably 20 teams that got better seeds. So some people out there thought SFA was no slouch. It was definitely a bad match-up that produced an ugly game both teams, but one we still should've won.
Committee intentionally put together the turnover teams & Underwood-Huggins. How many coincidences are needed? Then the game was Friday night in primetime on CBS, the very top billing for the entire first round. They had an inkling the upset was coming.
I still maintain we should've been the 2 in Oklahoma City. No guarantees, but that was our earned seeding position. What was that CSU Bakersfield? I wonder how many turnovers they typically cause.
Next time, what it's worth, I don't care to play a team from any league period that's senior laden & has an enormous winning streak. All the Xs, Os, stats, RPIs are insignificant to that.
I also don't hope for any more "homecoming" tournament sites. Felt Brooklyn was more the focus for a few than was SFA.