I do not
- Thread starter state5
- Start date
Ball carrier then breaks a tackle in the endzone, but then the next Arkansas guy tackles him. Safety is the right call given that they didn't blow a whistle when forward progress was stopped.
After they guy breaks a tackle in the endzone - if he had not been immediately tackled but instead ran for 10 yards I bet nobody would complain about the forward progress non-whistle.
After they guy breaks a tackle in the endzone - if he had not been immediately tackled but instead ran for 10 yards I bet nobody would complain about the forward progress non-whistle.
Under those circumstances at least. The guy totally disengaged with the defender so the forward progress was completely off at that point<div>
</div><div>You can argue if forward progress should have been called earlier, but I think they did the right thing by swallowing the whistle.</div>
</div><div>You can argue if forward progress should have been called earlier, but I think they did the right thing by swallowing the whistle.</div>
I completely agree that it was the right call with the circumstances. I do however think that the whistle should have been blown prior to him breaking the tackle in the endzone. That is what i don't agree with. On the other hand it couldn't happen to a better bunch.
