to the nutz, leaking information is far more serious of an offense than the Trump campaign actually flirting or possibly collaborating with Putin's gang over the last 12-15 months? Am I understanding that correctly? I simply can't understand why chasing the "unmaskers" and "leakers" is more important than investigating the 18 (I think that is the number) of people in or around the Administration that had contact with the Russians, the people who failed to disclose contact with the Russian, or the people who just plain lied about contact with the Russians....... I guess beating the Dems "trumped" treason and being buddies with the bad guys.
I still remain confused....
- Thread starter Original Mountaineer1
- Start date
No, you don't have it right. Thus far, we haven't even remotely came close to collusion, so right now, the only crimes are those of leaking and unmasking.
When they can prove collusion, I'll lead the charge to oust his ***.
When did I say anywhere that collusion has been proven? My point is that without the "leakers" Congressional and DOJ investigations may never prove it or fully understand the connections, benign or not. Let's deal with the leakers when the dust settles on the other possible nonsense.
You know that proof isn't coming unless by someone that flips. And if you're just as willing to fry those that leaked on Obama, then I respect that.
