Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129281444" data-attributes="member: 1459051">No, they are facts. That was the actual data that the committee used to determine the selections. If you don't like the fact that teams are selected in the first place, that's a different story. That's not what we're dealing with here. You said that Florida St was the team that didn't belong, and I showed you that by the data the committee uses, Florida St had a better resume that TCU or Baylor. Again, if you don't like that any subjective judgment was used in the process, that's fine, but again that's a different discussion.By the way, whey you said:That's the definition of subjectivity. You don't have any &quot;facts&quot; that prove either Florida St didn't belong, or that Notre Dame &quot;showed that.&quot; It's only your subjective opinion that Florida St didn't belong. Again, you are being hypocritical. You complain about the committee's subjectivity, and then inject your own subjectivity.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129281444, member: 1459051"] No, they are facts. That was the actual data that the committee used to determine the selections. If you don't like the fact that teams are selected in the first place, that's a different story. That's not what we're dealing with here. You said that Florida St was the team that didn't belong, and I showed you that by the data the committee uses, Florida St had a better resume that TCU or Baylor. Again, if you don't like that any subjective judgment was used in the process, that's fine, but again that's a different discussion. By the way, whey you said: That's the definition of subjectivity. You don't have any "facts" that prove either Florida St didn't belong, or that Notre Dame "showed that." It's only your [I]subjective opinion[/I] that Florida St didn't belong. Again, you are being hypocritical. You complain about the committee's subjectivity, and then inject your own subjectivity. [/QUOTE]

Name