Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PaintedontheSky" data-source="post: 129281532" data-attributes="member: 1807814">You need a dictionary..... and to stop with this thing you've got about redefining the meaning of words.No they are not facts.&nbsp; Facts by definition are indisputable.&nbsp; Data on the other hand is subject to a variety of interpretations and is subjective.I'll let 'skygusty' give you definition of &quot;ordinal&quot; and while he's at it maybe he'll d give you the definition of 'arbitrary' and the function and use of such things. ............by the way, of course it's my 'subjective opinion' about Florida State and of course it's hypocrisy.&nbsp; And since that's the case, why on earth would you defend 'subjective opinions' and hypocrisy on one hand and condemn it on the other?The stated objective of the Playoff Committee was &quot;To select the 4 best teams&quot;.&nbsp; You think the method(s) they used resulted in placing the 4 best teams in the playoff in light of the &quot;FACT&quot; one 1 of their &quot;4 best&quot; lost by 39 points while omitting 1 or 2 better teams? And &quot;ranking&quot; Alabama as their 1st seed who lost, Oregon as their 2nd seed who lost, Florida State as their 3rd seed who lost BIG TIME?&nbsp; Hell, the Playoff Committee demonstrated that they can not only NOT select the '4 BEST TEAMS' they can not even seed the 4 they did select correctly. Settle it on the field of play, my man. [smoke]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PaintedontheSky, post: 129281532, member: 1807814"] You need a dictionary..... and to stop with this thing you've got about redefining the meaning of words. No they are not facts. Facts by definition are indisputable. Data on the other hand is subject to a variety of interpretations and is subjective. I'll let 'skygusty' give you definition of "ordinal" and while he's at it maybe he'll d give you the definition of 'arbitrary' and the function and use of such things. ............by the way, of course it's my 'subjective opinion' about Florida State and of course it's hypocrisy. And since that's the case, why on earth would you defend 'subjective opinions' and hypocrisy on one hand and condemn it on the other? The stated objective of the Playoff Committee was "To select the 4 best teams". You think the method(s) they used resulted in placing the 4 best teams in the playoff in light of the "FACT" one 1 of their "4 best" lost by 39 points while omitting 1 or 2 better teams? And "ranking" Alabama as their 1st seed who lost, Oregon as their 2nd seed who lost, Florida State as their 3rd seed who lost BIG TIME? Hell, the Playoff Committee demonstrated that they can not only NOT select the '4 BEST TEAMS' they can not even seed the 4 they did select correctly. Settle it on the field of play, my man. [smoke] [/QUOTE]

Name