I thought it was a good game because it was so close the entire game. Made it exciting. I was very surprised that Rutgers lost, especially when ahead by 5 with 19 seconds left. Hofstra just kept hitting the basket, I never saw anything like it.
It was a great college basketball game.I thought it was a good game because it was so close the entire game. Made it exciting. I was very surprised that Rutgers lost, especially when ahead by 5 with 19 seconds left. Hofstra just kept hitting the basket, I never saw anything like it.
I was there and said the same thing. Hofstra must've shot 70% in the second half and hit everything they put up when the clock was running down. We played very well, we just ran into a team that managed to make every shot they took, including a banked 3 from lulu land.I thought it was a good game because it was so close the entire game. Made it exciting. I was very surprised that Rutgers lost, especially when ahead by 5 with 19 seconds left. Hofstra just kept hitting the basket, I never saw anything like it.
Who’s got the stats on winning percentage for a team banks a three in at the RAC?I was there and said the same thing. Hofstra must've shot 70% in the second half and hit everything they put up when the clock was running down. We played very well, we just ran into a team that managed to make every shot they took, including a banked 3 from lulu land.
Yup, once that bank three fell you knew it wasn't our night.Who’s got the stats on winning percentage for a team banks a three in at the RAC?
Banking a three is an omen for how the games going to go for that team.
Just not going to miss.
twitter is blowing up with neutral parties saying this was one of the funnest and best games they watched this year...said the same things last year with Notre Dameit was great game for neutral observers especially
I realize that wasn't our usual defensive showing, but would you say that if the score was reversed?twitter is blowing up with neutral parties saying this was one of the funnest and best games they watched this year...said the same things last year with Notre Dame
guess what neither of those games are good for Rutgers fans...RU cannot win at the tempo, allowing Hofstra to dictate the pace of the game was a disaster in the making.
I thought it was a horrible game.
It was a great game imo. You’re salty now I get it but sometimes the other teams makes plays and gets a little lucky too. Hang in there.twitter is blowing up with neutral parties saying this was one of the funnest and best games they watched this year...said the same things last year with Notre Dame
guess what neither of those games are good for Rutgers fans...RU cannot win at the tempo, allowing Hofstra to dictate the pace of the game was a disaster in the making.
I thought it was a horrible game.
If you didn’t know that one team was supposed to be clearly better than the other, it must have been entertaining.
great game for what....i dont want to see RU giving up 88 points and 19 points in 5 and half minutes. Notre Dame was a great game too..what does that even meanIt was a great game imo. You’re salty now I get it but sometimes the other teams makes plays and gets a little lucky too. Hang in there.
Press shouldtwitter is blowing up with neutral parties saying this was one of the funnest and best games they watched this year...said the same things last year with Notre Dame
guess what neither of those games are good for Rutgers fans...RU cannot win at the tempo, allowing Hofstra to dictate the pace of the game was a disaster in the making.
I thought it was a horrible game.
Can you believe how poised and how unintimidated they seemed from the get-go. It's like they punked us. I think you and I were watching a totally different game than all the other people who are praising RUs performance. And I was there with totally unobstructed view.twitter is blowing up with neutral parties saying this was one of the funnest and best games they watched this year...said the same things last year with Notre Dame
guess what neither of those games are good for Rutgers fans...RU cannot win at the tempo, allowing Hofstra to dictate the pace of the game was a disaster in the making.
I thought it was a horrible game.
If you didn’t know that one team was supposed to be clearly better than the other, it must have been entertaining.
Sometimes you gotta tip your hat bac. They got a little lucky to banked threes late shot clock heave for a three. Contested makes. It was a great game. And we kept answering until the last one rimmed out. Just my opinion.great game for what....i dont want to see RU giving up 88 points and 19 points in 5 and half minutes. Notre Dame was a great game too..what does that even mean
you know what was a great game..michigan....wisconsin and penn state, the team using their bread and butter to lock down games
Can you believe how poised and how unintimidated they seemed from the get-go. It's like they punked us. I think you and I were watching a totally different game than all the other people who are praising RUs performance. And I was there with totally unobstructed view.
Agree 100%. It felt totally inevitable. The frustrating thing is that we know that this team has the potential to play so much better on both sides of the ball and we have all seen it when they show up. It's not even about winning necessarily. Because we've seen them play complete games on a very high level and still lose the game. This was not one of those games.Maybe entertaining to non RU fan but It felt like this ending was inevitable all game. Playing at Hofstras pace, trying to trade baskets with a team that literally couldn’t miss. Zero defense. Up 5 with 29 seconds I knew in my gut they’d find a way to snatch defeat.
They didn’t really need to play any better on O. Putting up 85 pts on 50% from the field (40% from 3) should be enough to win any game. They simply couldn’t get stops. All game. Aside from the first 5 mins, Hofstra scored at will. In 33 games, Hofstra has only shot the ball like that 2 other times. That should not happen against a supposedly elite defensive team. Agreed, just not a complete game.Agree 100%. It felt totally inevitable. The frustrating thing is that we know that this team has the potential to play so much better on both sides of the ball and we have all seen it when they show up. It's not even about winning necessarily. Because we've seen them play complete games on a very high level and still lose the game. This was not one of those games.
Rutgers putting up 85 points means that they have been driven out of their prototypical successful game plan.They didn’t really need to play any better on O. Putting up 85 pts on 50% from the field (40% from 3) should be enough to win any game. They simply couldn’t get stops. All game. Aside from the first 5 mins, Hofstra scored at will. In 33 games, Hofstra has only shot the ball like that 2 other times. That should not happen against a supposedly elite defensive team. Agreed, just not a complete game.