thatsbaseball said:
What you`re implying that is everyone who runslow of money automatically robs a freaking bank. It don`t work that way.
So, taking Masoli to aid your QB situation = robbing a bank to aid your financial situation?
If that's the case, and the real world = the SEC, then yes, everyone that runs low on money would rob a bank. If you use your analogy but make the real world more like the SEC, you have to add that you have a mob boss who is going to have you killed if you don't pay him what you owe him (wins) within a certain time period. Add that to the situation and take away all other outlets for getting money to save your head, and there are a lot of people (coaches) that would consider robbing a bank. That's more like an SEC coaching situation, because if you lose, you lose your job.
Most of the rational posters on this board are willing to admit that if your QB situation were similar, you'd have taken him. We weren't going to take him. Then Cotton quit and left us in a bind. We took him. It's that simple.
Any coach that values his job, is willing to take a few risks if they are necessary. If you enjoy playing morally superior because your Ole Miss buddies have gigged you in the past, that's fine. They'll be gigging you again in the near future when something similar happens to you. That's why I quit playing that game with my buddies, well, along with the fact that I gave up on the idea of the student athlete about 5 or 6 years ago. College sports is what it is. No one has a morally superior ground to stand on.