I for one certainly wanted Calipari gone. And I’m still glad it happened, as it was well past time for that. It was nothing personal. I thought Calipari did a pretty good job in the seat, outside of the main job – e.g., having the primary goal every year be winning a championship.
If Calipari were coaching at a program that didn’t have the ability to put together basically any type of roster a coach wanted it would be one thing. Having a gimmick – signing and relying on as many projected OAD 1st round draft picks as possible - might be perceived as giving a Memphis or Xavier or St. John’s, etc. a chance to go for it and build notoriety. But UK, Kansas, UNC, and Duke (and a few others) don’t need the gimmick. They could build title chasing rosters most every year by developing and relying on All-Conference type upperclassmen, shoring up weak spots through top proven portal players and maybe one OAD with a special needed skill set (to help win rather than provide a place to bide time until the draft), and building a foundation with really good freshman you can mostly retain and develop. That’s the proven higher percentage system. UKGrad24 nailed it. Calipari’s system was a failed and completely unnecessary gamble year-in-and-year-out.
What Calipari did appeared to me to be personal vanity and a desire to build a legacy that he would be known for and keep him in demand even without winning titles.
Calipari always wanted his freshman gone after one year so he could bring in another crop and was careful not to bring in transfers that would compete with OAD freshmen. How is that not for his interest rather than the goal of winning a championship?