No. To improve educational attainment we need for the parents to:Would that make the students any smarter?
No. To improve educational attainment we need for the parents to:
The more parents do this the better performance will be. Your kid can get an excellent education at almost every public school. But if you don't make parenting your child in academics your priority they won't.
- Put academic success at the very top of their expectations for their kids,
- encourage their kids to work hard and accept nothing but success.
- If the kids are behind they need to tutor their kids or pay for tutoring - even if it takes money away from other things.
- Pull kids from sports and recreational things if their grades aren't EXEMPLARY. Sports should be reserved for kids who have their academic house in order.
- OWN your kid's achievement. If your kid is bringing home bad grades you should feel ashamed and motivated to do something about it.
If you were to give your employees great healthcare, lots of holidays and a big raise, would that increase their output?
No they would grow accustomed to it then demand more for less. Hire teachers who have a passion to teach.If you were to give your employees great healthcare, lots of holidays and a big raise, would that increase their output?
So you know that more money equals happier teachers? Get progressivism out of education like putting behavior problem kids where they belong in a jail cellWould better paid, and thus happier teachers be more motivated and concerned about the success of their students?
Would an increase in pay make more college students pursue a teaching degree, giving schools a bigger (and therefore more talented) applicant pool to choose from when hiring their new teachers?
No, I don’t know that. It’s just something to consider. I think it’s possible but who knows.So you know that more money equals happier teachers? Get progressivism out of education like putting behavior problem kids where they belong in a jail cell
I would hope for hotter looking naughty ones.Big money means more or less naughty teachers?
But extracurriculars are an important part of the educational process. That's why they are weighed in college admissions departments for admission and scholarship decisions.No. To improve educational attainment we need for the parents to:
The more parents do this the better performance will be. Your kid can get an excellent education at almost every public school. But if you don't make parenting your child in academics your priority they won't.
- Put academic success at the very top of their expectations for their kids,
- encourage their kids to work hard and accept nothing but success.
- If the kids are behind they need to tutor their kids or pay for tutoring - even if it takes money away from other things.
- Pull kids from sports and recreational things if their grades aren't EXEMPLARY. Sports should be reserved for kids who have their academic house in order.
- OWN your kid's achievement. If your kid is bringing home bad grades you should feel ashamed and motivated to do something about it.
Smaller schools too. I hate how every high school has to have a graduating class of 1500 now. To easy to get lost in the shuffle.Smaller size classes would help.
We see a generational cycle of poverty and crime in many urban areas. Kids, for whatever reason don't get a good education, so they can't go on to higher education, can find jobs, fall into a life of crime - wash, rinse repeat. That cycle can't be broken until educational systems are improved.
Before another dime is spent, school boards need to look closely at some of the success stories - things that other similar school systems have done that have resulted in significantly better educated kids. In sort model their systems after what has proven to work.
That may not require spending a lot of money, but it may require extension of providing some basic services for kids living in poverty including school meals and mentoring/tutoring services. I'm willing to bet the volunteers could be enlisted to do a lot of those things.
Here is a link that discusses at-risk school success stories
Bottom line is we don't need to throw tons of money at the problem needlessly with fancy new buildings and huge teacher payrolls. School boards can get a lot more bang for the buck if they just invest some time in researching what can work, and put together smart programs to achieving it without having to break the bank in the process.
KY has a very good Tech School System. Every student doesn’t need to be prepared for college. These should be identified before high school age and the options presented to them.Most of the kids living in poverty do so because of single-parent households. THAT'S the cycle that needs to be broken in order to fix the educational system. For whatever reason it is taboo to discuss this particular topic, especially as it concerns the breakdown of the African-American family. Issues resulting from single parent families do not discriminate against race, it just so happens that the number is significantly higher in the black community.
Eastern KY is about as poor of a region as there can be. However, if you look at the list of best schools (testing-wise), it's littered with schools from that region.
Most of the kids living in poverty do so because of single-parent households. THAT'S the cycle that needs to be broken in order to fix the educational system. For whatever reason it is taboo to discuss this particular topic, especially as it concerns the breakdown of the African-American family. Issues resulting from single parent families do not discriminate against race, it just so happens that the number is significantly higher in the black community.
Eastern KY is about as poor of a region as there can be. However, if you look at the list of best schools (testing-wise), it's littered with schools from that region.
Really? You don't think there are societal and governmental things that can be done to help reverse this trend? What do you think started it?Definitely a kid in a single parent home is under more stress and less advantaged that a kid in a two parent home regardless of race, and I see no reason that can't be discussed. But realistic what can society or government do in a meaningful way about that?
I think it makes more sense to focus on things that CAN be done and are proven to actually work. If kids become better educated they will become more successful adults, will improve their economic situation over their parents and IMO that will result in more stable family situations.
Really? You don't think there are societal and governmental things that can be done to help reverse this trend?
Eliminate the very forms of subsistence (welfare) which have made human reproduction sustainable through processes separate from traditional family / social structure . . . just a guess.
So it is your assertion that they would refuse to work, refuse to do anything to earn their right to exist? How interesting. Maybe it is you who should write a thesis about how millions of people would voluntarily die.