I'm trying to process how Sirmon is so bad at his job.

CardX

Heisman
May 29, 2001
254,750
19,564
0
One thing that stands out is that he "coaches" from the press box during games. Grantham, despite not being perfect, was on the field. He was firey, intense, he actually led his unit. Meanwhile, Pete's up in the air conditioned press box while his guys are getting killed and humiliated out there. He's completely worthless.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
So is this the start of a rehire-Grantham crusade?

Not specifically intended for you, X, but do some of you guys realize what a "bad look" means in a program or fanbase?

Also keep in mind that football for the time being is the only revenue sport we have with any stability or expectations. ANY...
 

CardX

Heisman
May 29, 2001
254,750
19,564
0
So is this the start of a rehire-Grantham crusade?

Not specifically intended for you, X, but do some of you guys realize what a "bad look" means in a program or fanbase?

Also keep in mind that football for the time being is the only revenue sport we have with any stability or expectations. ANY...

Not at all. It's common practice to compare new guy to previous guy. They have two different styles. I can appreciate Grantham's "rah, rah" shtick. I do not appreciate Sirmon's "eye in the sky" approach to coaching his defense.
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
As I mentioned in another post, let's demote Sirmon or make Ward co defensive coordinator. We don't have much left at stake except a bowl game.
 
Oct 15, 2009
2,635
873
0
Personnel vs. Sirmon? Both?

I think it may be a combination of both but am convinced there is enough talent on the defensive side to design better schemes. Any decent opponent is going to take advantage or should take advantage of that weak defense.

It's just hard to believe that the overall talent is that bad. Maybe it is.
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
Personnel vs. Sirmon? Both?

I think it may be a combination of both but am convinced there is enough talent on the defensive side to design better schemes. Any decent opponent is going to take advantage or should take advantage of that weak defense.

It's just hard to believe that the overall talent is that bad. Maybe it is.
Part of it is scheme. Grantham was a believer in the 3-4 and recruited for it. However, Grantham relied heavily on blitzing packages. When teams realized this, they were able to adapt blocking schemes and found ways to exploit one on one coverages. Sirmon does line up 4 guys usually but usually the fourth guy is a 258 lb linebacker who tries to rush against a 300+ OL and these are not your fat, slow lineman of years past. No pressure on the QB makes everyone a Tom Brady.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
Part of it is scheme. Grantham was a believer in the 3-4 and recruited for it. However, Grantham relied heavily on blitzing packages. When teams realized this, they were able to adapt blocking schemes and found ways to exploit one on one coverages. Sirmon does line up 4 guys usually but usually the fourth guy is a 258 lb linebacker who tries to rush against a 300+ OL and these are not your fat, slow lineman of years past. No pressure on the QB makes everyone a Tom Brady.
That possibility explains part of it but, what’s the excuse for getting consistently gashed by simple handoffs to the tailback?

It all starts with the D-line where we aren’t big enough or deep enough to play 4-3. As you said the lack of depth puts a linebacker as one of the 4 meaning someone like London I - all 220 lbs of him - in at outside LB. He was recruited to play SS or the star position that JHC played - not LB for chrissakes.

I can’t even fathom how screwed we will be if Stacy Thomas is gone for the year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CardsFirst

Cardiac Red

Heisman
Mar 5, 2012
17,032
14,107
113
I'm tired of hearing about thin on talent or being young.. I want to talk about effort, or lack thereof.

This defense (Offense too for the most part) plays with NO heart, NO intensity, NO physicality, and NO extra effort. All the above are coaching issues plain and simple..
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
I'm tired of hearing about thin on talent or being young.. I want to talk about effort, or lack thereof.

This defense (Offense too for the most part) plays with NO heart, NO intensity, NO physicality, and NO extra effort. All the above are coaching issues plain and simple..
Well consider this, we started Richardson at 326, Robinson at 302 and Young at 254. That was our DL. Bailey and Dorsey are subs that have size, otherwise we use Hearns at 249 or Greenard at 257. Those guys are LBs not lineman. When the OL have 5 guys plus a TE, we are overmatched.
 
Feb 19, 2007
36,732
514
0
I don't see Bill Sirman lasting past this year. I think this was definitely a hire Petrino got wrong. Bill Sirman's defense at Mississippi State last year certainly didn't indicate a young up and coming Defensive Coordinator. Sirmon will probably get let go after the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BPGhost

Louisvillian

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2006
7,715
4,470
0
It seems like it’s always a weekly drama when it comes to Petrino’s Defensive coordinators.
Even during the so called ‘salad days’ of BP’s first stint. Mike Cassity was a favorite whipping boy for fans and BP himself, ie: 2005 South Florida debacle, 2005 WVU 2nd half, 2004 Memphis hanging a half a hundred on us etc...

Then the love hate relationship with Grantham and now the small 6 game small sample of Sirmon.

I’m not going to knock Sirmon’s coaching philosophy yet because there’s more ways than one to coach a successful defense (anyone remember Belichick’s defense in his first Super Bowl against the Rams rushing only 2 and dropping 9 into coverage for a lot of the game). Belichick learned not to blitz Kurt Warner and co from an earlier regular season game.

That’s what I’d like to see is in game adjustments to what the offense is doing and will somebody please wrap up and make a damn tackle (also a complaint by fans about Grantham’s guys over the years). Football is still a game of emotion so It would be nice to see a defense show up and play with passion for 60 minutes minus the fake juice. That part, is on Petrino as much as anyone.
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
I don't see Bill Sirman lasting past this year. I think this was definitely a hire Petrino got wrong. Bill Sirman's defense at Mississippi State last year certainly didn't indicate a young up and coming Defensive Coordinator. Sirmon will probably get let go after the season.
Sorry Nole. Bill Sirman was fired a long time ago. Now Pete Sirmon, he's still the DC for now. Couldn't pass that up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchmidtyNole_rivals

topdecktiger

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2011
35,696
1,310
0
It's just hard to believe that the overall talent is that bad. Maybe it is.

It is to some extent. It's not that they are bad. They just aren't physically imposing enough when it comes to a really big offensive line, really big receivers, or something like that. NC State has a pretty good line, and the guys up front more or less can't beat them one on one. If you can't be disruptive up front, then there isn't much else you can do to stop a team. Especially if that team also has some 6'3-4" receivers to chunk the ball to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouisvilleKid79

Louisvillian

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2006
7,715
4,470
0
It is to some extent. It's not that they are bad. They just aren't physically imposing enough when it comes to a really big offensive line, really big receivers, or something like that. NC State has a pretty good line, and the guys up front more or less can't beat them one on one. If you can't be disruptive up front, then there isn't much else you can do to stop a team. Especially if that team also has some 6'3-4" receivers to chunk the ball to.
Thanks for the enlightenment Beano. We thought you were dead.
 

Thecycle27

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2017
3,867
3,052
0
This is going to be a long year. The defense is in a really tough spot personnel wise which completely limits what can be done scheme wise. They have tried to play soft and tight coverage no one, excluding Alexander, can stay with any receiver. The have no one on the Dline that is putting pressure on the QB. Bottom line they are going to have to blitz to put pressure which means the secondary has to cover which they can't do. I am not real sure they will get pressure if they blitz. I am sorry the personnel is not good.
 

CardsFirst

Heisman
Jan 18, 2007
14,171
13,284
113
I'm tired of hearing about thin on talent or being young.. I want to talk about effort, or lack thereof.

This defense (Offense too for the most part) plays with NO heart, NO intensity, NO physicality, and NO extra effort. All the above are coaching issues plain and simple..

I agree with this especially on defense. I think we can all agree that Charlie left us short on the O line. But he didn’t when it comes to the defense. So riddle me this Robin? Why were we able to compete with Clemson years 1-3 of CBP era, but not year 4. Either CBP staff isn’t coaching their players or we’re not recruiting the players we need. So we have an issue. I personally think the defense has slipped each year CBP has been here so it’s probably a little of both.
 

Cardiac Red

Heisman
Mar 5, 2012
17,032
14,107
113
Well consider this, we started Richardson at 326, Robinson at 302 and Young at 254. That was our DL. Bailey and Dorsey are subs that have size, otherwise we use Hearns at 249 or Greenard at 257. Those guys are LBs not lineman. When the OL have 5 guys plus a TE, we are overmatched.
Everyone understands that.. That doesn't excuse the lack of effort, piss poor arm tackling, and lack of physicality our LB' s and secondary play with, every time our secondary gets beats they look like they're looking for someone to blame, hands on hips like they're defeated.. NO swagger NO confidence.. I can't see how anyone could defend the schemes, techniques, and lack of effort this defense plays with. Injuries happen, thats part of football, theres never an excuse for not playing hard..
 
  • Like
Reactions: CardsFirst

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
If Petrino fires Sirmon after this year, he's grasping at straws, clueless how to find a good D coordinator, and doomed to repeat his mistakes. It will be in all likelihood the beginning of HIS end...
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
If Petrino fires Sirmon after this year, he's grasping at straws, clueless how to find a good D coordinator, and doomed to repeat his mistakes. It will be in all likelihood the beginning of HIS end...
Eliminate the first word if your post and you sound prophetic.
 

UofLCardfan

Freshman
Dec 17, 2004
189
81
0
How about trying to get VANCE BEDFORD. Our defense under strong obviously was pretty good and I understand strong was a defensive coach but BEDFORD. Was the one calling most of the defensive plays. Maybe not big third downs but he took most of it off of Charlie's hands so he could try to run the whole team. I think BEDFORD would be a good hire, obviouslyit couldn't get much worse than it is now
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
Everyone understands that.. That doesn't excuse the lack of effort, piss poor arm tackling, and lack of physicality our LB' s and secondary play with, every time our secondary gets beats they look like they're looking for someone to blame, hands on hips like they're defeated.. NO swagger NO confidence.. I can't see how anyone could defend the schemes, techniques, and lack of effort this defense plays with. Injuries happen, thats part of football, theres never an excuse for not playing hard..
I don't defend the schemes, I hate the 3-4 concept. But if you are recruiting more LB and WR than lineman, it's hard to fix the situation for the next game. I agree there are poor fundamentals in tackling. Everyone seems to want to throw their shoulder instead of wrapping their arms, but I don't equate that with a lack of effort.
 

Rollem Cards

Heisman
Jul 9, 2001
55,267
13,639
0
How about trying to get VANCE BEDFORD. Our defense under strong obviously was pretty good and I understand strong was a defensive coach but BEDFORD. Was the one calling most of the defensive plays. Maybe not big third downs but he took most of it off of Charlie's hands so he could try to run the whole team. I think BEDFORD would be a good hire, obviouslyit couldn't get much worse than it is now
Until CBP takes more pride in defense we are not getting a Vance Bedford. And even if we did, we won't keep him. See Grantham.

A strong willed D.C., mixed with CBP = one too many roosters in the hen house.
 

Thecycle27

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2017
3,867
3,052
0
Sirmon maybe awful, but it is impossible to tell if he is awful because he can't coach or he doesn't have talent or it is combination of the two. The sample size is too small. They were terrible at Miss St well Miss St isn't exactly wearing it out against good teams either with Louisville's old coach.

Recruiting matters. Louisville is starting a true freshman at middle linebacker, at corner, and occasionally at free safety. The truth is they aren't ready. They are going to be good, but they aren't there yet. They have no legit backup for Stacey Thomas, Avery another true freshman will play a bunch and he is 210 pounds as a true freshman. FYI a position he has never played. If Grantham was so good why is Louisville having to rely on true freshman? They have no legit pass rushers after 3 years of recruiting. All the comments talking about how talent is an excuse, it directly impacts what a coach can do defensively.

The complaints about tackling, poor execution within the system, not being a physical defense and lack of effort are a legit concerns. That is on Sirmon and his staff. I am not convinced you can coach defense without someone on staff providing energy on the sidelines. Defensive is about energy, emotion, and playing fast I don't see that kind of energy with this staff. You need a Grantham, Bedford, or someone in that mold to keep the energy going.

That is an overall concern for the entire program. Petrino said it if you need me to get you going that isn't him. I think that is a very pro approach, but he has to have someone on staff providing that energy. His brother was that guy the first go around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman

teamcanada

Senior
Aug 27, 2007
925
753
0
They had no sacks and 1 QB knockdown against NC State. You can't let the QB sit back there all day.
 

beantowncard

Heisman
Mar 9, 2009
56,272
25,255
82
I'm tired of hearing about thin on talent or being young.. I want to talk about effort, or lack thereof.

This defense (Offense too for the most part) plays with NO heart, NO intensity, NO physicality, and NO extra effort. All the above are coaching issues plain and simple..
Malik Williams is all heart. Too bad he’s gone.
 
Aug 24, 2001
83
15
0
One thing that stands out is that he "coaches" from the press box during games. Grantham, despite not being perfect, was on the field. He was firey, intense, he actually led his unit. Meanwhile, Pete's up in the air conditioned press box while his guys are getting killed and humiliated out there. He's completely worthless.
Some coaches believe that where ever they are located it is the best place to be. With that said I believe the problem with Pete is that is not very creative. NC St ran the QB on every short yardage play because we left the center uncovered, even I recognized it but Pete did not adjust. I could go on but that would not be fair to him, he just one sweat individual who is having a great time but I am not. He may be the most unqualified DC in the last 30 years.