In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
I do not know of one unless you are thinking Washington... Syracuse maybe?
I do not know of one unless you are thinking Washington... Syracuse maybe?
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
- Thread starter Sutterkane
- Start date
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
Syracuse could be better or worse depending on the candidates geographic preference, but i would say they are worse. I think there are very few openings left. Wyoming even hired a guy.
Syracuse could be better or worse depending on the candidates geographic preference, but i would say they are worse. I think there are very few openings left. Wyoming even hired a guy.
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
The more important question in this hire is what coaches that could be targeted for hire are in positions as attractive or more so than MSU. I think that is gonna be our biggest obstacle.
The more important question in this hire is what coaches that could be targeted for hire are in positions as attractive or more so than MSU. I think that is gonna be our biggest obstacle.
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
<font face="Arial" color="#000000" size="2">There aren't many openings period. Here's all that I could come up with, along with the coaches they've hired so far. Currently, only Washington & Syracuse on as big an opportunity as State.
</font><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #4d0000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">
Clemson - hired Swinney
Washington
Syracuse - a lot of people are predicting Gill Turner here
New Mexico
</font></font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #4d0000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000" size="2">Miami of Ohio
Wyoming - hired Missouri OC
Toledo
Bowling Green
San Diego State
Utah State
Other possible openings:
Auburn
Notre Dame</font></span></p>
<font face="Arial" color="#000000" size="2">There aren't many openings period. Here's all that I could come up with, along with the coaches they've hired so far. Currently, only Washington & Syracuse on as big an opportunity as State.
</font><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #4d0000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">
Clemson - hired Swinney
Washington
Syracuse - a lot of people are predicting Gill Turner here
New Mexico
</font></font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #4d0000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font color="#000000" size="2">Miami of Ohio
Wyoming - hired Missouri OC
Toledo
Bowling Green
San Diego State
Utah State
Other possible openings:
Auburn
Notre Dame</font></span></p>
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
Why would a Pac-10 Washington vacancy be that much more preferred than an SEC MSU vacancy?
Why would a Pac-10 Washington vacancy be that much more preferred than an SEC MSU vacancy?
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
1. They've won a MNC, so they've got some tradition.
2. Seattle.
3. It's easier to win there than the SEC - the PAC-10 consists of 1 great team, and a couple decent ones.
4. In-state rival is putrid.
1. They've won a MNC, so they've got some tradition.
2. Seattle.
3. It's easier to win there than the SEC - the PAC-10 consists of 1 great team, and a couple decent ones.
4. In-state rival is putrid.
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
I would say 2nd tier MS > best talent in Washington. Of course if you don't win the conference it is kind of a wash. I am just comparing typical SEC teams to Pac 10. Normally a SEC team in the BCS is going to beat the **** out of a Pac 10 that isn't USC.
However it would be easier to get to the BCS in the Pac 10 since you have USC and then some good teams like Ore St., Oregon, Cal, Stanford is on the rise. But Washington is in worse shape than we are. Most games with the walrus in the SEC were relatively close and that is with his dumbass decisions and ****** recruiting.
I would say 2nd tier MS > best talent in Washington. Of course if you don't win the conference it is kind of a wash. I am just comparing typical SEC teams to Pac 10. Normally a SEC team in the BCS is going to beat the **** out of a Pac 10 that isn't USC.
However it would be easier to get to the BCS in the Pac 10 since you have USC and then some good teams like Ore St., Oregon, Cal, Stanford is on the rise. But Washington is in worse shape than we are. Most games with the walrus in the SEC were relatively close and that is with his dumbass decisions and ****** recruiting.
In this thread, list all schools with an opening that are more attractive than MSU
They have gobs of both. We have little of either, although the resources are catching up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Huskies
They have gobs of both. We have little of either, although the resources are catching up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Huskies