Intelligence official on NRP, Flynn did not violate any law

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn (C) arrives prior to a joint news conference between Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 13, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
US Intel Official Says Nothing Criminal In Flynn’s Phone Call


RACHEL STOLTZFOOS

An intelligence official told NPR there’s no evidence Michael Flynn broke the law on the phone calls with the Russian ambassador that led to his resignation as national security adviser.

The official said there are transcripts and recordings of the calls, and that they do not contain any evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Flynn resigned after news broke that he had misled Vice President Mike Pence about the call.

The official also told NPR it does not appear from the calls that Flynn was acting under specific orders from Trump.

Democrats are calling for an investigation into whether Flynn did or did not break the law by possibly discussing sanctions with the ambassador. The White House maintains he did not break the law, but he did mislead Pence about the call and therefore lost the trust of the administration. (RELATED: Defiant Flynn Shares Final Thoughts Before Resignation)

Sponsored Content


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/16/u...-criminal-in-flynns-phone-call/#ixzz4YrafZ4j8
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
right... that's why we fired his dumb ***.[thumbsup]

No, Trump fired him because he mislead Mike Pence. You need to read a lot more and get your facts straight. This intelligence officer has apparently listened to the tape, read the transcript and found nothing there. It's on NRP, an extremely liberal station.
 
Dec 17, 2007
14,537
359
83
No, Trump fired him because he mislead Mike Pence. You need to read a lot more and get your facts straight. This intelligence officer has apparently listened to the tape, read the transcript and found nothing there. It's on NRP, an extremely liberal station.
Correct, this is the president's bidding if he feels there was a violation of trust. A legal violation could be considered secondary, but I think it would be fair to conduct a more detailed investigation to make sure no laws were broken. Would only validate the presidential actions.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Correct, this is the president's bidding if he feels there was a violation of trust. A legal violation could be considered secondary, but I think it would be fair to conduct a more detailed investigation to make sure no laws were broken. Would only validate the presidential actions.

I want a FULL investigation. I want to know what Flynn did. Release the damn tape in full. But I also want to investigate the leaks. They were blatantly illegal. Put their asses in jail, take away any pension. I hope Sessions convenes a Grand Jury to do this kind of full investigation. Subpoena everyone involved. Look at phones records, emails, any form of communication. It is the only way to get to the truth.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,686
1,751
113
I want a FULL investigation. I want to know what Flynn did. Release the damn tape in full. But I also want to investigate the leaks. They were blatantly illegal. Put their asses in jail, take away any pension. I hope Sessions convenes a Grand Jury to do this kind of full investigation. Subpoena everyone involved. Look at phones records, emails, any form of communication. It is the only way to get to the truth.
It would lead back to the White House....under Obama.