Interesting poll. Numbers don't lie.

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,689
1,758
113
Except when they lie. NRA membership isn’t public nor publicly available.
I support background checks for all gun sales from registered gun dealers. Person to person Sales would be impossible to enforce and thus, I'm not in favor of blanket background checks.
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
I support background checks for all gun sales from registered gun dealers. Person to person Sales would be impossible to enforce and thus, I'm not in favor of blanket background checks.
I would think nearly everyone doesn't want the wrong people having guns. Open ended terms like 'measures' make #2A people uncomfortable. Also, 'the wrong people' could be defined. Oh well, it's a BS poll, anyway.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
I would think nearly everyone doesn't want the wrong people having guns. Open ended terms like 'measures' make #2A people uncomfortable. Also, 'the wrong people' could be defined. Oh well, it's a BS poll, anyway.

When I think of terms like "wrong people" I immediately think about those things that used to get people checked into insane asylums 100 years ago. The list is pretty bizarre to think about today.

So, a guy goes on a mass shooting spree ... obviously he shouldn't have had a gun, right? Sure, hindsight and all of that ... but how do you check/know that ahead of time?
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
but how do you check/know that ahead of time?

I think a team of psychologists/psychiatrists should conduct a forensic study to look back at all the whackos that have committed mass murder shootings and see if there were any commonalities, tell-tale signs, indicators, common behaviors/traits, etc. Money well spent, even if it is inconclusive.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
I think a team of psychologists/psychiatrists should conduct a forensic study to look back at all the whackos that have committed mass murder shootings and see if there were any commonalities, tell-tale signs, indicators, common behaviors/traits, etc. Money well spent, even if it is inconclusive.

That sounds good in theory, but there aren't good records for that kind of thing. Crime data has been inconsistently collected and is still being inconsistently collected, although it's getting better.

For instance, 50 years ago somebody goes into rob a store. The store owner tries to jump the robber and the robber ends up shooting and killing them. The only thing that would have been recorded was the most severe of the crimes, the murder. There really wouldn't be anything in the crime data to point to the fact that it was part of a robbery as well, or the details of the events that lead to the shooting.

Yes, there would probably be court records from the trial and whatnot ... but can you imagine the effort involved in going to find all of that information and complete the data for all of those events?

20 years from now, what you are proposing might be available for about 30 years of data, but it would be hard to come by right now.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,164
814
113
I think a team of psychologists/psychiatrists should conduct a forensic study to look back at all the whackos that have committed mass murder shootings and see if there were any commonalities, tell-tale signs, indicators, common behaviors/traits, etc. Money well spent, even if it is inconclusive.
I'll bet that it has or is being done.