Riley took over a team that had multiple 8-9 win seasons. Rhule did not. Riley also inherited Tommy Armstrong. Rhule? Nuttin honey.Riley was 19-19 in conference play. Rhule is 10-17. If Riley was bad...then what do we have now.
Riley took over a team that had multiple 8-9 win seasons. Rhule did not. Riley also inherited Tommy Armstrong. Rhule? Nuttin honey.Riley was 19-19 in conference play. Rhule is 10-17. If Riley was bad...then what do we have now.
His overall record was 19-19. His conference record was 12-14 which is still better than Rhule. Though, most of those wins came in the 2016 season which had the softest of soft schedules.Riley was 19-19 in conference play. Rhule is 10-17. If Riley was bad...then what do we have now.
Frank getting the job was the start.This is the way I feel too.
Eichorst hiring Riley was the start of down fall of our program that we haven’t recovered from.
And yet he is the last Husker Head Coach to win outright conference championship.Frank getting the job was the start.
There really wasn’t any way we could have logically hired anybody else. There would have been widespread revolt because Tom wouldn’t have blessed anybody else. We most definitely fired Frank at least a year too soon.Frank getting the job was the start.
I think when Minnesota came calling for Frank-Coach Osborne made a promise to Frank that Coach Osborne would step down in a couple of years and Frank would take the job. I’ve heard Coach Osborne refer to a “promise” several times- pretty sure that was it.There really wasn’t any way we could have logically hired anybody else. There would have been widespread revolt because Tom wouldn’t have blessed anybody else. We most definitely fired Frank at least a year too soon.
Meaning what? That his 1 (at least I think it was only 1) conference championship in the 6 years following a decade of one of the greatest and most impressive programs in history, is proof that the downfall didn’t start with Frank? That’s comical, and thank you for pointing out that he managed to get 1, and making my point for me. He was given the keys to a high performance vehicle when the most he could handle was a Chevy Cavalier.And yet he is the last Husker Head Coach to win outright conference championship.
Yeah, if TO said he was going to get it, he was going to get it, doesn’t mean it wasn’t a bad decision. He wasn’t fired too soon, except from the standpoint that the jackasses in charge did not have a plan post firing.There really wasn’t any way we could have logically hired anybody else. There would have been widespread revolt because Tom wouldn’t have blessed anybody else. We most definitely fired Frank at least a year too soon.
Yep and no coach no matter who should have the authority or right to make that promise. Then on top of that Frank wanted to make some coaching changes on staff and get some younger guys involved but TO put the clamps on that . Truth is TO has interfered many times in Nebraskas coaching issues since his retirement.I think when Minnesota came calling for Frank-Coach Osborne made a promise to Frank that Coach Osborne would step down in a couple of years and Frank would take the job. I’ve heard Coach Osborne refer to a “promise” several times- pretty sure that was it.
The problem of course is that while Tom shouldn’t have had the authority to do what he did, he earned that authority. He took less money to stay at NU and made NU 10s if not 100s of millions of dollars. Who realistically would we have hired if not Frank? We can debate whether Frank was the best choice but realistically he was probably the most logical choice.Yep and no coach no matter who should have the authority or right to make that promise. Then on top of that Frank wanted to make some coaching changes on staff and get some younger guys involved but TO put the clamps on that . Truth is TO has interfered many times in Nebraskas coaching issues since his retirement.
Here’s the thing. It’s not his job, his responsibility, or his privilege to hire his replacement. If he made a promise, then he was wrong to do so. To the degree anyone thinks the downfall started with Frank, they should be blaming Osborne for scheming behind his AD’s back.I think when Minnesota came calling for Frank-Coach Osborne made a promise to Frank that Coach Osborne would step down in a couple of years and Frank would take the job. I’ve heard Coach Osborne refer to a “promise” several times- pretty sure that was it.
You may be right- like many I felt Coach Osborne understood the job very well as well having great insight on the ability of his coaching staff. One would think Coach Osborne would have been in an excellent spot to determine who may have been the best fit. Coach certainly wasnt in this for the money or even fame - I’m going to definitely give him a pass but understand and respect how others may feel differently.Here’s the thing. It’s not his job, his responsibility, or his privilege to hire his replacement. If he made a promise, then he was wrong to do so. To the degree anyone thinks the downfall started with Frank, they should be blaming Osborne for scheming behind his AD’s back.
Sports Predictions
College Football Polymarket Odds: Point spreads for Week 4 games
On3 NIL
Troy Dannen: Nebraska is 'behind' in NIL spending, sets 'top third' of Big Ten as goal
Inside Nebraska Football
Nebraska OC Dana Holgorsen & DC Rob Aurich look back at 3-0 start, preview Michigan State
College Football Playoff
ESPN ranks Top 25 teams with highest chance to make College Football Playoff after Week 3
Rivals Football Recruiting
Early junior season evaluations prompt 2028 Rivals300 update