I’ve attended a couple of D2 games the last few seasons. They have portal issues too, guys wanting to go D1 and I get that. But those were a good time to just enjoy college football without all that has showed up at the top level.That’s like I’ve said before. I love college football, I love the pageantry, the drama, the unfolding chapters of each season, I feel myself back on the field each game. I have no desire, admiration, or respect for wanting ‘a successful program’ this badly.
I went to ETSU and have been to several of their in the past few years ( although none this year) and really enjoy watching them play.Unfortunately the public values having a successful football program that much.
Sad. Went to the Furman v Citadel game a few weeks ago. Much more enjoyable than the big time crap.
Easy come, easy go!Lemme guess: This is what all those new billionaires do with all that new wealth....try and buy a championship?
Maybe that's without a buyout, or a relatively small buyout.No coach is worth that kind of money.
If 90 million for a coach so you can win more football games than everyone else is ‘serious’ then yeah no; I’m among those not serious as well.The Clemson game outcome is irrelevant to what I think USC should do after the season is over, Can we afford it? Well Louisiana is a poorer state than South Carolina., Louisiana's median household income is 14% lower than South Carolina's. And homes in Louisiana are 30% less expensive than they are in South Carolina. Maybe LSU has more wealthy alumni than USC? I don't know. Here is what I suspect: some schools are more serious about football than others. USC is among those not serious.
My point is not that I'd pay $90 million. My point is that buying out Beamer and hiring a new Head Coach is not an insurmountable barrier, if we want to.If 90 million for a coach so you can win football games than everyone is ‘serious’ then yeah no; I’m among those not serious as well.
And has been pointed out numerous times, the guy was damaged goods. No, he wasn't someone we could hire at that time.I said we should have tried to hire him after Spurrier ...
We went from hiring legendary Head Coaches who were past their prime to hiring a proven loser of a Head Coach, then following that up by hiring someone not thought of highly enough to be made an OC or DC, much less a Head Coach. That's why I question whether or not we are SERIOUS about having a championship caliber football program. When we hired proven FBS Head Football Coaches (Carlen and Morrison). it worked out every time. They provided signs they would succeed. But Carlen was fired by corrupt President Jim Holderman for non-football reasons. Morrison died. Thus, before Carlen and Morrison had a chance to really get the ball rolling, it ended for them and us. The formula for building a winner is there, if we just copy it.Fans were against it because they felt he would come here and shake the bushes a little too much and not get along with the great Ray Tanner and BOT. Plus he had a reputation for supposedly being womanizer or something. So we settled for the status quo of course. We care more about hugging babies than winning football games.
Virginia Tech got sick and tired of pu$$y-footing around and decided to hire a proven winner. South Carolina? If only.Kiffin's career win percentage is no different than James Franklin.
Franklin is a winner. You can just tell by the way he carries himself.Virginia Tech got sick and tired of pu$$y-footing around and decided to hire a proven winner. South Carolina? If only.
To quote, first Boston Red Sox baseball fans, and later Steve Spurrier, "Why not us?".Franklin is a winner. You can just tell by the way he carries himself.
If 90 million for a coach so you can win more football games than everyone else is ‘serious’ then yeah no; I’m among those not serious as well.
The only way a coach is "worth" (and I used that word loosely) $90 million is if he wins a title.
I hear you. I watched the Montana/Montana State game today. Super entertaining. It's FCS, but these two fan bases think it's the biggest deal ever.Unfortunately the public values having a successful football program that much.
Sad. Went to the Furman v Citadel game a few weeks ago. Much more enjoyable than the big time crap.
Yeah, good offensive mind but wouldn't put in the elite head coach category. Guy has paid his dues as a coach though. Was essentially handed the Raiders head coaching job in his early 30s then struggled at UT and Southern Cal and started back over at Florida Atlantic. People were saying the last couple years how Ole Miss is perfect for him because there's no pressure to make the playoffs every year-theyre just happy to be in contention. If he's smart, he'll stay. But he's getting enticing offers to leave.I think Kiffin is a very good coach but not nearly worth all the annual hysteria over whether he'll leave for a bigger job. He's gotta win something at some point.
It won't surprise me if he ends up staying at Ole Miss and is just using all this stuff with other school to make a dramatic show out of staying put. That's the only thing that would be Kiffin than leaving for a bigger program.