Now I'm quite aware none of you "bragging, boasting, bellicose" Leftists can even attempt a logical, rational, or reasonable explanation of how Joe Biden got
10 million more votes than Barrack Obama, yet lost significant numbers of challenged Democrat incumbent House races for his party?
It makes no sense!
I'm offering this analysis to further explain how illogical this argument is. I function on logic...if something doesn't make logical sense to me, I dismiss it. (It's a big reason I don't vote Left)
So here....consider these facts as logic as to why Biden's victory is not be trusted.
excerpts:
Donald Trump has majority approval. Nearly six in 10 Americans feel better off today than when Barack Obama was in office, and 15 percent more voters pulled the lever for his re-election than in his 2016 victory. These are not the numbers of a losing candidate, yet we’re told Joe Biden managed to prevail.
- Not since President Grover Cleveland’s re-election campaign in 1888 has a sitting president won more votes the second time around and still lost
- Trump won a greater share of minority votes than any Republican presidential candidate since 1960 and brought more Democrats over to his side than in 2016. More than nine in 10 evangelical Christians voted to re-elect the president. For Trump to expand his coalition of voters so substantially and still lose is historic.
- According to Gallup, only 32 percent of Americans say they aren’t better off since Trump was inaugurated. No sitting president has lost re-election when more than half of the country is doing better than before the incumbent entered office.
- Part of the reason for Americans’ strong sense of being better off under Trump surely stems from the unprecedented prosperity Americans were experiencing until this past spring when the Chinese coronavirus stopped the world’s economies. Under the president, minority unemployment had reached record lows, and minority wealth savings had reached record highs. At the same time, the stock market had risen to all-time record highs. In other words, the Trump economy was benefiting Americans at all economic levels.
- In the past, the performance of the S&P 500 in the three months before Americans head to the polls has predicted 87 percent of elections since 1928 and 100 percent since 1984. If the S&P is in positive territory by the end of those three months, the incumbent party almost always wins. On the last trading day in July, the S&P 500 closed at 3,271, was up nearly 7 percent by mid-October, and closed at 3,310 on the Monday before the 2020 election. The market predicted a Trump victory.
- In June, during the middle of the pandemic, pollster Scott Rasmussen was blown away by the enthusiasm gap between Trump and Biden voters. He wrote in amazement: “Wow! 76 percent of Trump voters are enthusiastic about their candidate compared to just 49 percent of Biden voters.” Anyone who saw a Trump rally would not be surprised. At one of his last campaign stops before Election Day, about 60,000 Trump supporters showed up to see the president in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump tractor parades, boat parades, and 30-mile-long highway caravans have been a common feature of the 2020 campaign.
- By a 7 percentage-point margin, Harvard/Harris polling found in late September that more Americans believed their neighbors would vote for Trump’s re-election than for Biden. In the week before the election, USC Dornsife published a poll asking a similar question: “Do you think your friends and neighbors are voting for Trump?” USC concluded that “it’s looking like an Electoral College loss for Biden.”
- Just 12 days before the election, Trump’s approval rating popped over 50 percent and has held steady since that time. As Gallup noted, “[A]ll incumbents with an approval rating of 50 percent or higher have won re-election, and presidents with approval ratings much lower than 50 percent have lost.” Rasmussen and Zogby both had Trump hitting that “holy grail” approval number tied to certain re-election. On the day before the election, Rasmussen had Trump at 52 percent approval. At the same point in his presidency, and before his own re-election, Obama had 50 percent.
These are all logical, rational, and I'd argue unassailable facts which goes back to my original question in post #22.
If we're to believe Joe Biden's surprising victory, we MUST believe his voters indeed hated Trump but supported Trump's policies. Why? Because the people who helped Trump pass that agenda were either re-elected or elected over opposing Democrats down ballot. Democrats
lost seats in a record turnout election. Not only in Congress, but in State Houses where critical redistricting lines will be drawn.
If we're to believe Joe Biden's massive vote winning victory, we have to assume his voters rejected the very Democrats he's going to need to dismantle Trump's agenda. He does not have that support.
Biden's party lost seats, they may not even be in the majority once all the recounts are completed!
So the only other logical, rational, reasonable conclusion one can develop as to why only Joe Biden got votes over Trump's supporters and even members of his own Democrat party is the recorded votes
only for him were not genuine.
What other logical, rational, reasonable explanation is there?