Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Brett McMurphy's college football AP Top 25 ballot after Week 1
On3:
College Football Bowl Projections Week 2: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions
On3:
Unfiltered Takes after Week 1: Julian Sayin, Arch Manning, Alabama & much more
On3:
College Football Playoff Prediction: Bracketology shake-up after Week 1
CaneSport:
Good Morning CaneSport 9.2.25: Miami Headlines Before Coffee
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Isn't this reason enough to expand...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charleston Mountie" data-source="post: 129570508" data-attributes="member: 1427666"><p>Nice work pulling this together and the data speaks for itself but you must also recognize this is a static moment from the 2015 payout for the 2014 year. These numbers are based on contracts that have been renegotiated in the case of the Big Ten and enhanced annually by the SEC. The Big-12 looked very good in this report but the gulf between them and the Big Ten and SEC is widening even as we speak and we will not see that report until the spring of 2017.</p><p></p><p>You also seem to denigrate the ACC because it has more members and a CCG to bring in extra money and still falls short of the Big-12. The dismissive implication is that the Big-12 would get no added bonus from the same choices - more members and a CCG. What you are not grasping here is that the ACC needs those two elements to offset the atrocious pay out they are contracted into.</p><p></p><p>The PAC-12 faltering in their media contracts is not news and the future looks dimmer yet for that conference as they cannot get a buyer for their program. This seems odd too when you consider there is no overlap with another conference on FOX Sports or ESPN. Seems no one thinks much of the viewing market in the Mountain and Pacific time zones.</p><p></p><p>The Big-12 contract is static and the SEC and Big Ten contracts are growing at a fast pace. I for one do not care what the ACC or Pac-12 numbers are as they do not matter in the Big-12 situation. Big-12 schools will make more than members from those conferences. The Pac-12 has hit a glass ceiling because none of the national broadcasters thinks they have anything worth selling and the ACC faces a double whammy:</p><p></p><p>An inept commissioner tying conferences finances to his sons livelihood</p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p>An overlap of the Big Ten in the north under FOX and overlap of the SEC in the south under ESPN. The ACC's only hope for a network is a Raycom bastardization something like the Pac-12 has done and we have all seen how well that has worked out for them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charleston Mountie, post: 129570508, member: 1427666"] Nice work pulling this together and the data speaks for itself but you must also recognize this is a static moment from the 2015 payout for the 2014 year. These numbers are based on contracts that have been renegotiated in the case of the Big Ten and enhanced annually by the SEC. The Big-12 looked very good in this report but the gulf between them and the Big Ten and SEC is widening even as we speak and we will not see that report until the spring of 2017. You also seem to denigrate the ACC because it has more members and a CCG to bring in extra money and still falls short of the Big-12. The dismissive implication is that the Big-12 would get no added bonus from the same choices - more members and a CCG. What you are not grasping here is that the ACC needs those two elements to offset the atrocious pay out they are contracted into. The PAC-12 faltering in their media contracts is not news and the future looks dimmer yet for that conference as they cannot get a buyer for their program. This seems odd too when you consider there is no overlap with another conference on FOX Sports or ESPN. Seems no one thinks much of the viewing market in the Mountain and Pacific time zones. The Big-12 contract is static and the SEC and Big Ten contracts are growing at a fast pace. I for one do not care what the ACC or Pac-12 numbers are as they do not matter in the Big-12 situation. Big-12 schools will make more than members from those conferences. The Pac-12 has hit a glass ceiling because none of the national broadcasters thinks they have anything worth selling and the ACC faces a double whammy: An inept commissioner tying conferences finances to his sons livelihood and An overlap of the Big Ten in the north under FOX and overlap of the SEC in the south under ESPN. The ACC's only hope for a network is a Raycom bastardization something like the Pac-12 has done and we have all seen how well that has worked out for them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Isn't this reason enough to expand...
Top
Bottom