It's amazing..

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
that we are even in this game.

Jarvis was 11 for 19 (according to Yahoo gamecast).

Rest of the team is 12 for 57 which is an incredible 21%.

Yahoo has Bost and Randy as 4 for 30. How in the hell are we even in this game?
 

HighPointDawg

Redshirt
Feb 9, 2005
1,022
0
0
Seriously... we should have lost by 25 in regulation with how the guys were shooting tonight.... Instead it took some great Refs to beat us.
 

drummer8806

Redshirt
Mar 24, 2008
66
0
0
HighPointDawg said:
Seriously... we should have lost by 25 in regulation with how the guys were shooting tonight.... Instead it took some great Refs to beat us.
I think our views are quite different. The refs KEPT us in the game. We scored 41 points from the line and many of those fouls called on them were quite bad as well. The bad calls went both ways.

Also, I would like a legitimate reason as to why Ravern didn't play at all to end the game. And I would also like to know why we never gave Phil any help on Tasmin Mitchell. Also the technical foul by Stans to end regulation was really dumb. I thought Stans did a poor job tonight.
 

saltybulldog

Redshirt
Nov 15, 2005
1,394
1
32
Also, I would like a legitimate reason as to why Ravern didn't play at all to end the game.

From what I gather he is something like 1 - 10 in the past two games.

And I would also like to know why we never gave Phil any help on Tasmin Mitchell.

Listening to the broadcast, they commented on how we keep rotating onto Mitchell, but it still didnt help.

Also the technical foul by Stans to end regulation was really dumb. I thought Stans did a poor job tonight.

Apparently alot of people agreed with Stans that the call was ********. Some people are going to hate Stans no matter the outcome.

Coach K got blown out at home as well, so he must suck too.
 

cbudawgs

Redshirt
Nov 18, 2008
15
0
0
I saw Stans go to Ravern with about 2 mins left in the first ot. He put his head next to Ravern and looked like he asked if he wanted in. Ravern refused and Varnado said something to him from the end of the bench with visible frustration. Hard to blame Ravern if he thought Benock was the one who should be in. If he has no confidence in himself he did the right thing to let Stans know. For the record tho, he did try to put Ravern back in.
 

drummer8806

Redshirt
Mar 24, 2008
66
0
0
saltybulldog said:
Also, I would like a legitimate reason as to why Ravern didn't play at all to end the game.

From what I gather he is something like 1 - 10 in the past two games.

And I would also like to know why we never gave Phil any help on Tasmin Mitchell.

Listening to the broadcast, they commented on how we keep rotating onto Mitchell, but it still didnt help.

Also the technical foul by Stans to end regulation was really dumb. I thought Stans did a poor job tonight.

Apparently alot of people agreed with Stans that the call was ********. Some people are going to hate Stans no matter the outcome.

Coach K got blown out at home as well, so he must suck too.
As to the Ravern thing, did you look at everyone else's shooting numbers?

As to Tasmin Mitchell, I was at the game, and we doubled him a few times but for the majority of the game it was one-on-one with Phil with no help side defense. The help side defense was the main thing that was lacking with guarding him.

And onto Stans. I'm not a Stans hater, but he did a poor job tonight. The inbounds pass to Jarvis to end regulation was a bad move, he put himself in the situation to be called for the technical foul, and I'm still ticked about a 47% three point shooter sitting for the majority of the end of the game.
 

HighPointDawg

Redshirt
Feb 9, 2005
1,022
0
0
Damn if he inbounded the ball to JV himself that is $#$$!#* impressive. How about the $#$$!#* fact that Bost was getting MUGGED, Turner broke long but not open and Barry was covered off the pick... JV was left open on purpose by LSU.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,909
5,743
113
b/c LSU had 21 TOs, several of which were caused by our good defense.