You mean like Mario Austin "doing well" ?? Or like Eric Dampier "doing well"? <div>Incognegro said:First off dumbass, it's not obvious that he won't do **** with himself. That's just something a bitter fan will say instead of wishing him the best. If he really ends up blowing all of the money and not properly investing it while he has the chance before his playing days are over then maybe he deserves that fate, but right now I don't see how anyone even as stupid as you can have a hard time seeing that he's doing well for himself.<div>
</div><div>Secondly, it doesn't mean **** if a coach gives a player the opportunity to play or not. What none of us were able to see is if they had a good relationship to begin with. Just because you bring someone on your team and let them play doesn't mean you've earned that players respect. If Stans wasn't able to command any of the players respect then that just goes to show even more that his weakness can be detrimental to the program because of that fact.</div>
medearis said:You may not like how I go about saying it, but concerning Jamont's decision, it's not that close of an argument. He may luck out and still make something of himself, but he clearly made the wrong decision. It's not really an opinion thing. It's obvious. Hell you can type his name into google and all that pops up are commentaries about how bad that decision was. So if speaking the truth makes me stupid, then so be it.
<div>
</div><div>As for my anger over his comments, it's really about respect. Jamont is able to get paid like he's getting paid because Stans gave him the keys to the team and let him showcase himself. Jamont's the one who has a bad attitude and makes bad decisions, despite his obvious talent. I'm not big on stabbing people in the back who are loyal to me. Especially in a tough time for Stans when he needs support.. like now. Maybe you guys roll like that. Not me. </div><div>
</div><div>
</div>
Hutchinson11 said:no i think you @mstateglfr win the dumbest comment of the week award by bashing Ronald Reagan..
mstateglfr said:Hutchinson11 said:no i think you @mstateglfr win the dumbest comment of the week award by bashing Ronald Reagan..
Yet another that apparently can't see that he was nothing close to the revised version the machine has turned him into.
Come on, this is supposed to be void of politics. I made a mistake of adding to that thread, not because I can't back up everything I said about him(I can, it's easy), but because my views of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism are wildly unpopular with both sides of the aisle and especially with 'Reagan Conservatives'...whatever the hell that actually is. I have always imagined a Reagan Conservative as someone that espouses minimal government while growing it...you know, since that is what the real Reagan did.
Yeah, I am crazy for not nutting one off to those results, aren't I?
Every single thing that I have said about him can be backed up. Everything. That must kill anyone that is able to critically think and still guzzles over his presidency. I have grown to honestly doubt there are many around who are able to actually hold a conversation about him. Most are only able to say 'you are a dumb ***' without any ability to actually defend Reagan's perplexing record.
I like how in your mind, some guy's racist ignorant comment isn't worse than me saying Reagan isn't nearly as great as revised history has made him.
Great assumption.vicious said:Posting that someone else is racist doesn't make you racist. You might feel I'm uninformed or misguided, but there is nothing racist about the statement. You're a freakin uneducated redneck that has no clue what racist means. </p>