Glaus could turn out to be decent. he looked great defensively today. he's shown good contact, but little power, particularly troubling given he's coming off a shoulder injury. Hinske has looked great too, and could see alot of time at first if Glaus struggles. Freeman has time to prove himself in AAA, and if he looks good he may get called up in June if Glaus and Hinske struggle. If all three blow this year, then maybe a trade, but for who? i don't see a Fred McGriff-type FA-to-be that could be gotten reasonably (which rules out Adrian Gonzolez).
IMO, it's GM malpractice that they passed on LaRoche and signed Glaus for not that much less, all after avoiding Adam Dunn like the plague last year. The reasons for passing on Dunn was that his defense was suspect (so they signed a guy who's never played 1b?). They passed on LaRoche........hell i don't even know why. maybe because he's slow to start in the 1st half of the season (so they signed a guy coming off an injury)? LaRoche would have been slightly overpaid, but with Freeman ready to go next year, a one year arb deal on him would have been perfect.
The truth of the matter is that when given a choice between player A and player B, they would have signed a no-armed midget over a reincarnated and in his prime Babe Ruth as long as the former's cost was $3M while the latter's was $8M. it's all about cash flow and stock price (same reason Heyward was called up early.) it's very typical of what's happened in business in this country, thanks to the over-incentivization of stock.