Needs to go.
Side note - the search function on this board sucks unless I'm missing something.
Side note - the search function on this board sucks unless I'm missing something.
Needs to go.
Side note - the search function on this board sucks unless I'm missing something.
Needs to go.
Side note - the search function on this board sucks unless I'm missing something.
Powell and the Fed are at the epicenter of the deep state imo.Makes one wonder if he is part of the deep state .
Please explain it to me then in context of the post you replied to.So you really don't understand how finance works do you?
BTW, remind me who appointed Jerome Powell?
here's the thing..the FED has a dual mandate (and I don't know where that came from) inflation and employment. And. from those measures they are doing OK. BUT, IMO, Trump is somewhat right in saying that this FED lives up to it's nickname "too late'. They were too late in cutting rates, then too late in raising rates and now, possibly, too late in lowering them. Back last year before the election the inflation rate was 2.4% and unemployment 4.2%. The FED cut .5% and then .25%. Last meeting the numbers were exactly the same but no cut.
So I understand what Powell is saying about the possible impact of tariffs in the future, but the impact in the present on the housing market is real. People can't afford homes with the rates where they are and people aren't moving as normal, because of rates. It won't be long until we get a cut back on new construction and layoffs.
I think the FED needs to have another mandate added to its work. That is, economic growth. Right now, growth isn't on their radar it seems. So right now Trump and FED are at counter points. Trump wants growth and FED is happy where economy is right now.
More than the Dallas Cowboys stadium...come on man!!!Pfft, cost overruns are typical for huge renovation projects but that doesn't make them Powell's fault. We all know this is a drummed up excuse to fire him for cause.
What happened with the renovation?
The original cost of the renovation of the Fed’s three office buildings overlooking the National Mall in Washington D.C. was estimated at $1.9 billion in 2019 but swelled to $2.5 billion. The more than 33% increase in budget was due to design changes, costs of materials, equipment, and labor and other “unforeseen conditions” like more asbestos than anticipated and toxic contamination in soil, the Fed’s FAQ said.
![]()
Fed Chair Powell's finally fighting back as the White House looks to fire him 'for cause'
The White House uses an overbudget renovation of Fed headquarters to pressure Fed Chair Powell out of his job. Will it work? And does it even matter?www.usatoday.com
Under the Trump administration, the cost was estimated to be 1.9B....is that cheap???More than the Dallas Cowboys stadium...come on man!!!
Trump had no part in it.Under the Trump administration, the cost was estimated to be 1.9B....is that cheap???
I don't like politicization of the FED either. But a case can be made that the FED already politicized itself. Back before the election inflation was 2.4% and unemployment was 4.2%. The FED cut rates twice. Last month the rates were exactly the same, but no cut. There were just as many uncertainties about the future before the election, different ones for sure, but those uncertainties didn't hold them back from cutting. Right now, you can make a pretty good case that the high rates are holding the economy back. A more robust economy would bring in more tax revenues, reduce interest on the national debt, increase wages, reopen the housing market and likely overcome the effect of tariffs.I can see it both ways honestly. I get the concerns about being late to reduce rates, but it's completely fair to be concerned about the tariffs effects, particularly with the unprecedented amounts and constant changes. The recent inflation numbers weren't very good, and that's concerning.
I absolutely hate the politicizing of the FED. We have got to have some parts of our system that aren't infected by partisanship. The direct attacks on the chairman is really bad and shouldn't be allowed.
I don't like politicization of the FED either. But a case can be made that the FED already politicized itself. Back before the election inflation was 2.4% and unemployment was 4.2%. The FED cut rates twice. Last month the rates were exactly the same, but no cut. There were just as many uncertainties about the future before the election, different ones for sure, but those uncertainties didn't hold them back from cutting. Right now, you can make a pretty good case that the high rates are holding the economy back. A more robust economy would bring in more tax revenues, reduce interest on the national debt, increase wages, reopen the housing market and likely overcome the effect of tariffs.
And, why is 2% the target? When I was younger economists were happy with 4% inflation. Why not 3%??
Inflation is down. Quit being ignorant.So if tariffs don't cause inflation, explain how inflation is increasing?
Inflation is down. Quit being ignorant.
From your article.
From your article.
The Consumer Price Index rose 2.7 percent from a year earlier, the swiftest pace since February, data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed on Tuesday. That is slightly higher than expected and up from an annual pace of 2.4 percent in May.
2.4 to 2.7. I can live with that. Its still seismically lower than it was under the treasonous commie dems and yes thats what I label you as.
The ROI was the same in January under the commie Dems, LOLFrom your article.
The Consumer Price Index rose 2.7 percent from a year earlier, the swiftest pace since February, data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed on Tuesday. That is slightly higher than expected and up from an annual pace of 2.4 percent in May.
2.4 to 2.7. I can live with that. Its still seismically lower than it was under the treasonous commie dems and yes thats what I label you as.