Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
On3:
FOX, YouTube TV reach short-term extension amid carriage dispute
On3:
After NCAA uncertainty, Rahsul Faison’s waiver approval paves way for South Carolina debut
On3:
20-team Big Ten in 2030, Maryland AD says; Notre Dame will not budge on independence
Florida:
Joel Klatt maps path for DJ Lagway's Heisman Trophy hopes
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Jim Delaney on expanding playoffs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doneagain" data-source="post: 131124672" data-attributes="member: 1396145"><p>My question to those that are opposed to expansion is what makes 4 the right number? Opinion? Why isn’t 2 the right number anymore? It was for years according to the pre-playoff era talking heads.</p><p></p><p>To me if they are going to limit it on purpose then it should have stayed at 2 with the old BCS system. They are still just deciding who gets to play for the championship like the BCS did, and then after the 4 teams play, they all say, “Oh, the committee got it right.” Well when only the 4 teams they selected have a chance to win it, obviously one of the 4 will win it. That doesn’t mean TCU couldn’t have won it when they were snubbed after conveniently dropping from third to 5th behind Ohio State. And I don’t blame OSU for that as any school in that position would be happy they got bumped in even at someone else’s expense.</p><p></p><p>The conference championships of the P5 conferences have to mean something, otherwise when the G5 schools finally get the balls to sue over exclusion, they can say the argument that G5 conferences aren’t good enough is moot because clearly the playoffs don’t respect the P5 champions either, so there is no clear distinction between level of competition among the G5’s and P5s, unlike weight classes in boxing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doneagain, post: 131124672, member: 1396145"] My question to those that are opposed to expansion is what makes 4 the right number? Opinion? Why isn’t 2 the right number anymore? It was for years according to the pre-playoff era talking heads. To me if they are going to limit it on purpose then it should have stayed at 2 with the old BCS system. They are still just deciding who gets to play for the championship like the BCS did, and then after the 4 teams play, they all say, “Oh, the committee got it right.” Well when only the 4 teams they selected have a chance to win it, obviously one of the 4 will win it. That doesn’t mean TCU couldn’t have won it when they were snubbed after conveniently dropping from third to 5th behind Ohio State. And I don’t blame OSU for that as any school in that position would be happy they got bumped in even at someone else’s expense. The conference championships of the P5 conferences have to mean something, otherwise when the G5 schools finally get the balls to sue over exclusion, they can say the argument that G5 conferences aren’t good enough is moot because clearly the playoffs don’t respect the P5 champions either, so there is no clear distinction between level of competition among the G5’s and P5s, unlike weight classes in boxing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Jim Delaney on expanding playoffs
Top
Bottom