Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pressvirginia" data-source="post: 129418889" data-attributes="member: 1348623">it should go by standings &amp; not rankings. w-l column is what matters. nfl playoffs, nba playoffs, mlb playoffs, fcs playoffs right on down the line. it's not rocket science.rankings are a beauty contest. losing games must matter. no justification to reward certain losses &amp; penalize others.undefeateds should be ahead of 1-loss teams. it's completely assumptive to say who win otherwise. if you're undefeated no one has proven you can be beat.when there's multiple 1-loss conference champs, make them play each other to see who gets a shot at the unbeaten. can't be emphasized enough teams must face consequences for losing. there's no way two 1-loss teams should be in there now with unbeatens on the outside.none of this will ever match March Madness. 68 teams get a shot. your record &amp; quality wins determine your seed. win or go home.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pressvirginia, post: 129418889, member: 1348623"] it should go by standings & not rankings. w-l column is what matters. nfl playoffs, nba playoffs, mlb playoffs, fcs playoffs right on down the line. it's not rocket science. rankings are a beauty contest. losing games must matter. no justification to reward certain losses & penalize others. undefeateds should be ahead of 1-loss teams. it's completely assumptive to say who win otherwise. if you're undefeated no one has proven you can be beat. when there's multiple 1-loss conference champs, make them play each other to see who gets a shot at the unbeaten. can't be emphasized enough teams must face consequences for losing. there's no way two 1-loss teams should be in there now with unbeatens on the outside. none of this will ever match March Madness. 68 teams get a shot. your record & quality wins determine your seed. win or go home. [/QUOTE]

Name