Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College football insider: Latest intel on QB battles, injuries, transfer buzz and more
On3:
College football coaching carousel expected to heat up in 2025
On3:
Will Toledo upset Kentucky in Week 1? Jason Candle betting on consistency in transfer portal era
On3:
After NCAA uncertainty, Rahsul Faison’s waiver approval paves way for South Carolina debut
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Joel Klatt calls out the CFP Committee,
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals" data-source="post: 129418902" data-attributes="member: 1759980"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #ff0000">It doesn't sound like the national playoff committee, which claimed to be designed to quell the faults of the BCS system, is doing much better.</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">I think there should be one undeniable criteria:</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">ANY unbeaten Power 5 conference champ gets into the playoffs period.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">Then you fill in with the rest.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">So, as of today, that would be Oklahoma State, Clemson and Ohio State/Iowa (one has to lose, maybe both). If there are 3 unbeatens, which has happened only twice in the past 15 to 20 years, so it's unlikely, then all 3 should be in the national playoffs.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">To do otherwise impugns the integrity of the selections.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">College football being what it is, the remaining games will make it tougher for the selection committee to gerrymander the selections. 2-loss Alabama isn't going to get in over an unbeaten Oklahoma State. </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">After all, it is the five Power 5 conferences that set up the selection committee. </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">None of the five conferences will tolerate persistent slanting of the choices against its conference. </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">The TCU and Baylor thing last year put the committee on notice. If an unbeaten Oklahoma State is NOT in the playoffs, holy hell will break out, and Texas and Oklahoma carry a lot of weight in college football.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">But let's play the games through Dec. 5 and see who's still standing. It does make for a lot of conversation throughout the back half of the season, doesn't it?</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals, post: 129418902, member: 1759980"] [B][SIZE=4][COLOR=#ff0000]It doesn't sound like the national playoff committee, which claimed to be designed to quell the faults of the BCS system, is doing much better.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [COLOR=#ff0000] I think there should be one undeniable criteria: ANY unbeaten Power 5 conference champ gets into the playoffs period. Then you fill in with the rest. So, as of today, that would be Oklahoma State, Clemson and Ohio State/Iowa (one has to lose, maybe both). If there are 3 unbeatens, which has happened only twice in the past 15 to 20 years, so it's unlikely, then all 3 should be in the national playoffs. To do otherwise impugns the integrity of the selections. College football being what it is, the remaining games will make it tougher for the selection committee to gerrymander the selections. 2-loss Alabama isn't going to get in over an unbeaten Oklahoma State. After all, it is the five Power 5 conferences that set up the selection committee. None of the five conferences will tolerate persistent slanting of the choices against its conference. The TCU and Baylor thing last year put the committee on notice. If an unbeaten Oklahoma State is NOT in the playoffs, holy hell will break out, and Texas and Oklahoma carry a lot of weight in college football. But let's play the games through Dec. 5 and see who's still standing. It does make for a lot of conversation throughout the back half of the season, doesn't it? [/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Joel Klatt calls out the CFP Committee,
Top
Bottom