Johansen

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,138
8,437
113
His defense might actually be worse than last year's. How is this possible? Players are out of place, bad technique, can't shed blocks.

He's been outcoached 2 weeks in a row.

I thought his system was supposed to be simple.
 

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,138
8,437
113
I refuse to believe it's talent. Players don't know WTF they're doing. Like what's going on? Even if he did coach at the fcs level, you'd at least need to have a defense that executes the right way to be a top 10 defense at that level.

Allison the LB is obviously undersized but to be an fcs all American you'd at least think he'd had outstanding football IQ. He's constantly in the wrong position. It just doesn't make sense.
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,677
15,512
85
Actually, in the BC game there was a huge improvement as soon as they changed LBs. All of a sudden in the 2nd half he finally benched #41 Allison (I don’t think he played another snap the rest of the game), and we limited BC to just 1 TD (8 points), the 78-yard 1-play breakdown. We actually stopped them every other drive in the second half.

#16 and #2 played, I’m not sure if either of them played alongside Allison before bc I was so focused on him bc of bewilderment. But the D noticeably improved stopping the run, containing the QB, and defending WRs over the middle once the LB switch was made. It gives small hope for some future games if we can stop the turnovers on O and they don’t put #41 back in.
 

RUinDJsMom

Redshirt
Sep 11, 2026
17
19
3
Mike Broadbent said on the youtube that this D is a Schiano scheme. Nothing they did week one was what J did at ND. he should post here
 

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
7,297
8,240
113
Actually, in the BC game there was a huge improvement as soon as they changed LBs. All of a sudden in the 2nd half he finally benched #41 Allison (I don’t think he played another snap the rest of the game), and we limited BC to just 1 TD (8 points), the 78-yard 1-play breakdown. We actually stopped them every other drive in the second half.

#16 and #2 played, I’m not sure if either of them played alongside Allison before bc I was so focused on him bc of bewilderment. But the D noticeably improved stopping the run, containing the QB, and defending WRs over the middle once the LB switch was made. It gives small hope for some future games if we can stop the turnovers on O and they don’t put #41 back in.
Agreed. I pointed that out in the game thread. As soon as walker enters the game it has a noticeable effect. Key tackles and a pick.
 

DHajekRC1984

All-Conference
Jul 20, 2025
1,245
1,171
113
Actually, in the BC game there was a huge improvement as soon as they changed LBs. All of a sudden in the 2nd half he finally benched #41 Allison (I don’t think he played another snap the rest of the game), and we limited BC to just 1 TD (8 points), the 78-yard 1-play breakdown. We actually stopped them every other drive in the second half.

#16 and #2 played, I’m not sure if either of them played alongside Allison before bc I was so focused on him bc of bewilderment. But the D noticeably improved stopping the run, containing the QB, and defending WRs over the middle once the LB switch was made. It gives small hope for some future games if we can stop the turnovers on O and they don’t put #41 back in.
Thank you. Moses Walker (#2) came in and completely changed things and made seversl great plays including that last last takeaway. At least I saw a coach making changes that worked. In the end it was the offense who lost this game even with that reckless last td pass and the stupid 2 pass rusher prevent.

1 sack and 2 picks in the half.. I guess he didnt flash in practice.
 
Last edited:

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,740
3,194
66
Re #41 there are two possibilities:

1 Johansen is a bad judge of talent.
2 Pre-season, when little hitting and flying around and barking can impress, led to the decision to use him.

I'm hoping it's 2 as that can be remedied once actual play is seen. Arguably #41 was as large a part in umass and BC first half success as anyone. Things radically changed when he was out.

Now Morris was only marignally better and should not be playing.

Walker had a carrer game and earned time. BUT McClary and Archie need to be in there just to see if increased atghlticism could get in the way of someone and not create huge holes.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,584
2,026
42
Re #41 there are two possibilities:

1 Johansen is a bad judge of talent.
2 Pre-season, when little hitting and flying around and barking can impress, led to the decision to use him.

I'm hoping it's 2 as that can be remedied once actual play is seen. Arguably #41 was as large a part in umass and BC first half success as anyone. Things radically changed when he was out.

Now Morris was only marignally better and should not be playing.

Walker had a carrer game and earned time. BUT McClary and Archie need to be in there just to see if increased atghlticism could get in the way of someone and not create huge holes.
Is it fault on talent? He other after the portal closed.

judging who to play I agree
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
90,692
88,799
113
mind boggling transfers in my opinion.

if a guy from Drake could play, Iowa or Iowa State would've found them already
Same for this guy who played at Drake.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: drewbagel423

Bueller

Senior
Nov 28, 2025
613
532
93
This defense is the worst I've seen at RU. Slow/lost/weak - maybe too much helmets and shorts in camp. I see opponents run right past RU defenders like they are potted plants. I see some of same stuff on offense and OLs actually "waddle" around the field like brubsers who at Twinkies all summer
 

Kbe4

Senior
Nov 25, 2025
806
722
93
Actually, in the BC game there was a huge improvement as soon as they changed LBs. All of a sudden in the 2nd half he finally benched #41 Allison (I don’t think he played another snap the rest of the game), and we limited BC to just 1 TD (8 points), the 78-yard 1-play breakdown. We actually stopped them every other drive in the second half.

#16 and #2 played, I’m not sure if either of them played alongside Allison before bc I was so focused on him bc of bewilderment. But the D noticeably improved stopping the run, containing the QB, and defending WRs over the middle once the LB switch was made. It gives small hope for some future games if we can stop the turnovers on O and they don’t put #41 back in.
#16 is Jesse Ofurie. He's not a linebacker.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,615
4,791
66
Mike Broadbent said on the youtube that this D is a Schiano scheme. Nothing they did week one was what J did at ND. he should post here
Does this surprise anyone ? Coordinators are willing puppets who come here for the pay raise and Schiano is a control freak like no other.

Being new, the DC is probably only allowed to turn the meeting room projectors on and off while Schiano’s taped ‘teaching’ LOL is played through the room AV.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: DHajekRC1984
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano previews USC game week
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY for $1 and get 50% off!
  3. 03 Women's Sports Latest intel on several uncommitted women's basketball recruits
  4. 04 The Knight Report How former Rutgers Football players performed in the NFL's Week One
  5. 05 Rivals Football Recruiting North Carolina EDGE Josiah Sturdivant backs off his pledge to Rutgers