Since you haven't read the emails you don't know this to be true.If the discovery unmasks some other scumbags that will be a good thing. But it will not exonerate Gruden one bit.
Since you haven't read the emails you don't know this to be true.If the discovery unmasks some other scumbags that will be a good thing. But it will not exonerate Gruden one bit.
At the time of the investigation, I am not sure who was employing Gruden. He was not coaching at the time. I have never liked Gruden but that is my own persoanal bias and if what has been reported is true he is not a very good person. If the NFL released the emails it was a targeted attack on Gruden for likely personal reasons and that doesn't sit well with me. They used to public cancel culture to force him out when they didn't want him associated with the shield.
If they had an issue it should have been done within the confines of the league office and the Raiders not in the tabloids.
I would bet if the NFL searched for Colin Kaepernick they would have a few more people in trouble. They should not have leaked his comments.He was working for ESPN at the time.
So everyone that reported what was in the emails is wrong. I get it.Since you haven't seen the emails you can't possibly know what you stated here.
We do indeed know you share the opinions expressed in Gruden’s emails.Since you haven't read the emails you don't know this to be true.
Yea, I get it too. That's not what I said at all. If the emails aren't out there how could anyone form an opinion? And if all the people that have given their "expert" opinion had read the emails than why are they not available?So everyone that reported what was in the emails is wrong. I get it.
So everyone that reported what was in the emails is wrong. I get it.
Duh! That would corroborate the source of the leak as the NFL and lead to calls for releasing all emails. Besides, Gruden has admitted to the content of his emails, so nothing to gain and nothing to add.Can you explain why the actual emails haven't been released? Seems easy enough to do.
Show me the last time the actual emails were released on any other scandal?Can you explain why the actual emails haven't been released? Seems easy enough to do.
yeah, I doSince you haven't read the emails you don't know this to be true.
Show me the last time the actual emails were released on any other scandal?
Because the NFL doesn’t want to throw the rest of th personnel at the Washington Football Team under the bus. Goodell protects the owners. It’s a club.I'd say there's a few in this one.
Read some of Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails
The State Department has released more of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email correspondence, reviving scrutiny of her service in the Obama administration as she wages a campaign to succeed him. The new batch of emails is the first from a pool of more than 50,000 pages turned over by the candidate...documents.latimes.com
Oh look, here's more.
The media routinely publishes emails, videos with extremely violent content, illegally leaked police reports, etc etc. Really, the bar is so low I have no idea why you're pretending it's unheard of to actually show the offending material. Back to the original question - why won't they release them?
Because the NFL doesn’t want to throw the rest of th personnel at the Washington Football Team under the bus. Goodell protects the owners. It’s a club.
The answer is readily available by Google search, but you obviously don’t want an answer, you want to excuse Gruden’s behavior.I'm not asking why Goodell isn't releasing the emails, I'm asking why the media outlets haven't published them, which you clearly seemed to have understood earlier in this thread.
Of course he admitted it, he didn’t question the accuracy of the content reported. Those questioning this just clearly want to defend his biases as they share them.I thought he admitted pretty much what was in the emails? I too would like to actually see them but he pretty much admitted it