Jonathan Turley, Comey may be in legal jeopardy over leaks

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley stated on his website that although the memos were created by Comey, the former FBI director would likely have to follow federal non-disclosure laws of classified and unclassified information.

Turley writes, “Besides being subject to Nondisclosure Agreements, Comey falls under federal laws governing the disclosure of classified and non-classified information. Assuming that the memos were not classified (though it seems odd that it would not be classified even on the confidential level), there is 18 U.S.C. § 641 which makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey ‘any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.’”

Additionally, Turley notes that Comey created the memos on a government computer so the memos could be classified as government documents and not something he owns.

“The problem is that Comey’s description of his use of an FBI computer to create memoranda to file suggests that these are arguably government documents. Comey admitted that he thought he raised the issue with his staff and recognized that they might be needed by the Department or Congress. They read like a type of field 302 form, which are core investigatory documents,” he says.

Leaking the documents places Comey into a legal box, Turley explains, as the FBI restricts using material to harm a “former represented person or individual or firm related to prior representation,” and the FBI website specifically says:

Dissemination of FBI information is made strictly in accordance with provisions of the Privacy Act; Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a; FBI policy and procedures regarding discretionary release of information in accordance with the Privacy Act; and other applicable federal orders and directives.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley stated on his website that although the memos were created by Comey, the former FBI director would likely have to follow federal non-disclosure laws of classified and unclassified information.

Turley writes, “Besides being subject to Nondisclosure Agreements, Comey falls under federal laws governing the disclosure of classified and non-classified information. Assuming that the memos were not classified (though it seems odd that it would not be classified even on the confidential level), there is 18 U.S.C. § 641 which makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey ‘any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.’”

Additionally, Turley notes that Comey created the memos on a government computer so the memos could be classified as government documents and not something he owns.

“The problem is that Comey’s description of his use of an FBI computer to create memoranda to file suggests that these are arguably government documents. Comey admitted that he thought he raised the issue with his staff and recognized that they might be needed by the Department or Congress. They read like a type of field 302 form, which are core investigatory documents,” he says.

Leaking the documents places Comey into a legal box, Turley explains, as the FBI restricts using material to harm a “former represented person or individual or firm related to prior representation,” and the FBI website specifically says:

Dissemination of FBI information is made strictly in accordance with provisions of the Privacy Act; Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a; FBI policy and procedures regarding discretionary release of information in accordance with the Privacy Act; and other applicable federal orders and directives.

That's kind of the way I understood it for the private sector, he wouldn't own them, regardless of where they were made. I don't get public sector crap sometimes, so I hadn't commented.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
That's kind of the way I understood it for the private sector, he wouldn't own them, regardless of where they were made. I don't get public sector crap sometimes, so I hadn't commented.

Libs on the board claiming Comey did nothing wrong or illegal. Now we have stores of violation of employment agreement at FBI, violation of FBI policies and procedures, NDA's that may have been violated. Far too early to tell his legal jeopardy, if any.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley stated on his website that although the memos were created by Comey, the former FBI director would likely have to follow federal non-disclosure laws of classified and unclassified information.

Turley writes, “Besides being subject to Nondisclosure Agreements, Comey falls under federal laws governing the disclosure of classified and non-classified information. Assuming that the memos were not classified (though it seems odd that it would not be classified even on the confidential level), there is 18 U.S.C. § 641 which makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey ‘any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.’”

Additionally, Turley notes that Comey created the memos on a government computer so the memos could be classified as government documents and not something he owns.

“The problem is that Comey’s description of his use of an FBI computer to create memoranda to file suggests that these are arguably government documents. Comey admitted that he thought he raised the issue with his staff and recognized that they might be needed by the Department or Congress. They read like a type of field 302 form, which are core investigatory documents,” he says.

Leaking the documents places Comey into a legal box, Turley explains, as the FBI restricts using material to harm a “former represented person or individual or firm related to prior representation,” and the FBI website specifically says:

Dissemination of FBI information is made strictly in accordance with provisions of the Privacy Act; Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a; FBI policy and procedures regarding discretionary release of information in accordance with the Privacy Act; and other applicable federal orders and directives.

I wish everyone would just....

 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,572
152
63
Libs on the board claiming Comey did nothing wrong or illegal. Now we have stores of violation of employment agreement at FBI, violation of FBI policies and procedures, NDA's that may have been violated. Far too early to tell his legal jeopardy, if any.
It's not a problem.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,050
1,981
113
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley stated on his website that although the memos were created by Comey, the former FBI director would likely have to follow federal non-disclosure laws of classified and unclassified information.

Turley writes, “Besides being subject to Nondisclosure Agreements, Comey falls under federal laws governing the disclosure of classified and non-classified information. Assuming that the memos were not classified (though it seems odd that it would not be classified even on the confidential level), there is 18 U.S.C. § 641 which makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey ‘any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.’”

Additionally, Turley notes that Comey created the memos on a government computer so the memos could be classified as government documents and not something he owns.

“The problem is that Comey’s description of his use of an FBI computer to create memoranda to file suggests that these are arguably government documents. Comey admitted that he thought he raised the issue with his staff and recognized that they might be needed by the Department or Congress. They read like a type of field 302 form, which are core investigatory documents,” he says.

Leaking the documents places Comey into a legal box, Turley explains, as the FBI restricts using material to harm a “former represented person or individual or firm related to prior representation,” and the FBI website specifically says:

Dissemination of FBI information is made strictly in accordance with provisions of the Privacy Act; Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a; FBI policy and procedures regarding discretionary release of information in accordance with the Privacy Act; and other applicable federal orders and directives.

I think the key here is what if any harm the memo caused to Trump.

It's already cleared him of any possible "obstruction" charges, if nothing more comes of the leaks it's basically cannon fodder for the media.

The only way I can see it becoming an issue is if Comey himself becomes part of the larger investigation behind the NSA leaks and the FBI probe into the subsequent unmasking and/or Hillary's server.

If the independent prosecutor determines Comey's leaks were an attempt to disrupt those ongoing investigations, or conceal any discovery activity pursuant to them, then Comey could indeed be in trouble for obstruction of justice himself.
 
Last edited:

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I think the key here is what if any harm the memo caused to Trump.

It's already cleared him of any possible "obstruction" charges, if nothing more comes of the leaks it's basically cannon fodder for the media.

The only way I can see it becoming an issue is if Comey himself becomes part of the larger investigation behind the NSA leaks and the FBI probe into the subsequent unmasking and/or Hillary's server.

If the independent prosecutor determines Comey's leaks were an attempt to disrupt those ongoing investigations, or conceal any discovery activity pursuant to them, then Comey could indeed be in trouble for obstruction justice himself.

Last night several legal experts cited specific statutes regarding federal record keeping that he may have violated, even for non-classified information. Once he put those notes on his computer, they became federal property, the people's property. In addition, he may have violated his FBI NDA, his FBI employment agreement and FBI policies and procedures in this matter. Not big time punishment, but still both criminal and civil possibilities.