José Altidore cleared to play

MSUDC11

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2012
7,316
0
0
I'm thinking he's a sub unless he is 100%, which I doubt.

Belgium has much more depth than us and we will need someone fresh that can score as it gets late.

He was playing really well when he got hurt. Scored two goals in the last friendly against Nigeria and started off pretty well against Ghana, so hopefully the injury hasn't knocked him out of form.
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
There's two lines of thought here

1. If he comes on as a sub, he's rested as fatigue sets in on others.
2. If he comes on as a sub, nobody really knows how much he can give.

I think that I would start him and see how far he can go. If you sub him in, you're pretty much counting on him being there for the rest of the match - extended period and all. If you start him, you can follow his progress and maximize substitutions. Plus, starting him will take some pressure off Dempsey in the front and hopefully allow for better possessions.

Klinsmann has to ask him if he can go 45. If not, depending on the situation, he's got to wait until late in the game - like around the 80th minute. If he can't go at all, it's nice mind games on Klinsmann's part.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
I just don't see him

playing, at all. I thing it would be detrimental to the team. "Running" in practice and playing in a knockout stage match against Belgium are two extremely different things. It would show extreme desperation to play him, I think.
 

rem101

Sophomore
Jan 22, 2008
3,184
133
63
Yeah, if you bring him on as a sub, you have to make sure you still have one more to bring him back out if he can't go. It really risk wasting a sub. So far though, I have no reason not to trust coach and his decision making.