futaba said:
the difference in the two is striking. Here you have Jordan riding a bus, shooting pool with the locals, playing hoops with the neighborhood kids, just being a generally good dude.
And now we have James.
The last thing i could ever think of calling Jordan is 'a generally good dude'. He was more accessible than LeBron currently is, but thats about it.
The guy was a complete man ***** to his wife and kids. He has an ego larger than the moon, has the need and ability to feed what was pretty much an insatiable addiction to gambling, and he was anything but the family dad who played hoops with the neighborhood kids.
That last one is hilarious because i grew up with 2 kids from his neighborhood.
Even now, he is still gambling, only as a front office guy. And he is still making terrible decisions.
I would figure a generally good dude would attempt to take a stance on at least non divisive social issues. I wouldnt ever expect someone who makes a living on their image to take actual public stances on the genocide in Darfur or something like that, even though that shouldnt be a divisive issue. But i dont even remember him speaking out in support of basic **** like breast cancer or the Special Olympics. Who doesnt like breasts?
To have that much influence and not use it in the least is a terrible waste.
I didnt hate the guy or anything, even though all that above makes it seem like i did. I just never saw him as what i would call a generally good dude. He was a calculated dude.