Just heard...some virus info

UKGrad93

New member
Jun 20, 2007
17,437
22,789
0
No.
1- that some are being tested does not mean “there is a vaccine”, which implies it works. Most vaccines, drugs, and biologicals that are tested don’t work and fail or are shown to not be safe.
2- it takes much longer than 3 months!!! Average time for a drug is 7 years. Even for rare serious diseases with no treatment options (where the FDA will work with you more), it is still at least 2-3 years. Vaccines can probably be faster. But I don’t think 3 months, or even 6.
Even once you are ready for safety and efficacy studies in humans, you have to design the trial, enroll the subjects, collect and analyze the data, write the report, send to the FDA for their review and approval. And then you have to manufacture it. Each step takes time. Patient safety in trials is a big deal!
I’ve heard experts mention a 12-18 month timeline. Maybe 3 months for phase 1 (make sure the vaccine itself doesn’t cause harm), maybe 6-9 months for phase 2(make sure it works), then another 3-6 months to roll it out on a larger trial.

The vaccine has to be right. You don’t want to give people a false sense of security and make the spread worse.

I expect to see something available a little sooner in Europe because they seem to have looser standards. Though, I do think the FDA will let this move a little faster than normal.
 

kl40504_rivals

New member
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
I’ve heard experts mention a 12-18 month timeline. Maybe 3 months for phase 1 (make sure the vaccine itself doesn’t cause harm), maybe 6-9 months for phase 2(make sure it works), then another 3-6 months to roll it out on a larger trial.

The vaccine has to be right. You don’t want to give people a false sense of security and make the spread worse.

I expect to see something available a little sooner in Europe because they seem to have looser standards. Though, I do think the FDA will let this move a little faster than normal.
We could reduce the speed limit to 25 mph and reduce highway deaths drastically or we could close down everything for six months and completely wreck the economy
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirRaidFreshman76

joeyrupption

New member
Jun 5, 2007
8,686
7,455
0
We could reduce the speed limit to 25 mph and reduce highway deaths drastically or we could close down everything for six months and completely wreck the economy
It is 56x less deadly to be on the road. There are 2 million drivers in the US. They carry an average of 0.59 passengers with them. The death rate of COVID-19 as a weighted average based on miles driven by age group is ~2.8%. The average time from infection to death is 18.5 days, which is 2.64wks. In that timeframe, ~1,777 would be killed on the road out of the 3.18MM people on it, that gives us a death rate of .05%. (2.8 / 0.05) = 56x multiplier.

We can adjust our society’s behavior in order to keep keep things rolling (not stopped) for a few months and get past this or we can suffer a catastrophe.
 

Blueaz

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2009
27,876
29,939
113
I take it reading comprehension is not a strength of yours. I never said it would take 7 years.
Sigh, Are you my ex?
Keep on keeping on.
Have fun, be save and stop trying to create ****. Good grief.
Since I can’t ignore her, I will you.
 

kl40504_rivals

New member
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
It is 56x less deadly to be on the road. There are 2 million drivers in the US. They carry an average of 0.59 passengers with them. The death rate of COVID-19 as a weighted average based on miles driven by age group is ~2.8%. The average time from infection to death is 18.5 days, which is 2.64wks. In that timeframe, ~1,777 would be killed on the road out of the 3.18MM people on it, that gives us a death rate of .05%. (2.8 / 0.05) = 56x multiplier.

We can adjust our society’s behavior in order to keep keep things rolling (not stopped) for a few months and get past this or we can suffer a catastrophe.
Or we can wait until next flu season and see a much higher rate of deaths.
 

LadyCaytIL

Well-known member
Oct 28, 2012
31,941
32,694
113
Or we can wait until next flu season and see a much higher rate of deaths.

Flu has a 0.1% mortality rate

Covid 19 has a 2%+ mortality rate

You didnt even stick to your total number of deaths but put the word rate in to make yourself even more wrong.
 

Ukbrassowtipin

New member
Aug 12, 2011
82,109
89,931
0
Flu has a 0.1% mortality rate

Covid 19 has a 2%+ mortality rate

You didnt even stick to your total number of deaths but put the word rate in to make yourself even more wrong.
But common sense tells us this number will drop the more people are tested.

"
What is the mortality rate of the new coronavirus?

It is probably about or a bit less than 1%. Much higher figures have been flying about, but the chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, is one of those who believes it will prove to be 1% or lower. The World Health Organization’s director general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, talked of 3.4%, but his figure was calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of officially confirmed cases. We know there are many more mild cases that do not get to hospital and are not being counted, which would bring the mortality rate significantly down."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...-facts-cure-mortality-rate-virus-covid-19-flu
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,143
0
It’s like the big reveal during season 2 of the walking dead. Everybody already has it.

This. If it's as infectious as they say, everyone is already exposed. There are probably hundreds of thousands that had or have it. Maybe millions.

Which is actually good news imo. The symptoms are so mild no one thought anything about it. And the mortality rate is way lower than they predict.
 

AustinTXCat

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2003
52,105
306,294
113
The wife of the President of The University of Texas was diagnosed with Corona, but they tested her husband and he came back negative. There is hope.
Yeah, made the news here Friday. She will self-quarantine. Another Fenves family member, who also works at UTexas, presumably has COVID-19 and is going into self-isolation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baller Cal

thecatsareback#8

New member
Jun 6, 2010
4,958
2,354
0
It is 56x less deadly to be on the road. There are 2 million drivers in the US. They carry an average of 0.59 passengers with them. The death rate of COVID-19 as a weighted average based on miles driven by age group is ~2.8%. The average time from infection to death is 18.5 days, which is 2.64wks. In that timeframe, ~1,777 would be killed on the road out of the 3.18MM people on it, that gives us a death rate of .05%. (2.8 / 0.05) = 56x multiplier.

We can adjust our society’s behavior in order to keep keep things rolling (not stopped) for a few months and get past this or we can suffer a catastrophe.
I don’t know where you are getting there are 2 million drivers in America. That’s not even close to being right.
Anyways, the chances of dying in a car wreck in the average American’s lifetime is 1/103. For the age groups of 1-50 you are looking at about 1/500 chance of dying.
 

TheDude73

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2006
23,787
22,827
113
Ages seem to be changing for more severe cases. France is now reporting that over half of the 300 hospitalized there are under 60.
 

cole854

New member
Sep 11, 2012
10,156
22,638
0
Ages seem to be changing for more severe cases. France is now reporting that over half of the 300 hospitalized there are under 60.

Which still tells only a portion of the story, as we don't know the health issues of these patients. 71 of the 91 who have died in France were older than 75.
 

awf

New member
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
Which still tells only a portion of the story, as we don't know the health issues of these patients. 71 of the 91 who have died in France were older than 75.
Your answers would imply that you feel is it OK for the older folks to die........Who give a flying F'k what the ages are of people who are dying.......people are dying from a pandemic virus..........
 

cole854

New member
Sep 11, 2012
10,156
22,638
0
Your answers would imply that you feel is it OK for the older folks to die........Who give a flying F'k what the ages are of people who are dying.......people are dying from a pandemic virus..........


Yeah...it's ok. :rolleyes:

Just saying that repeating these "stats" without telling the whole story leads to a lot of fear and misrepresentations.
 

catsfanbgky

New member
Oct 18, 2006
18,901
7,620
0
Your answers would imply that you feel is it OK for the older folks to die........Who give a flying F'k what the ages are of people who are dying.......people are dying from a pandemic virus..........

No what his answer was implying (at least for people with a brain), is that even if it was the flu or some other illness, older people have a very weak immune system, and whether healthy or not, have severely decreased lung capacity. As you get older, your immune system and oxygen decreases as natural aging. So in short, older people have a greater risk of dying even if they catch a case of the flu or pneumonia. So MAYBE the death rates of CV is not as intense as people are saying.

When the death rates of people under the age of 50, whom are somewhat healthy and do not have underlying health issues, then we can get alarmed.
 

kl40504_rivals

New member
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
Your answers would imply that you feel is it OK for the older folks to die........Who give a flying F'k what the ages are of people who are dying.......people are dying from a pandemic virus..........
Your favorite CNN broadcaster will keep you informed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saven

kl40504_rivals

New member
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
Your answers would imply that you feel is it OK for the older folks to die........Who give a flying F'k what the ages are of people who are dying.......people are dying from a pandemic virus..........
I never saw you on here before concerned about all the deaths due to the flu.
 

awf

New member
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
I am sure you have it as a favorite on your TV remote.
Just shows you don't know what you think you know.......That is the very last place I would look for information.......much like I could care less what you think....
 

John Henry

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2007
35,506
172,383
113
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack

awf

New member
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
I never saw you on here before concerned about all the deaths due to the flu.
Never was a discussion about death rates and the flu......if you can't see the difference between the virus and the flu that goes around every year you should inform yourself.....tangerines and grapefruit are both citrus but there are great differences in them........
 
May 22, 2002
7,871
3,227
0
LOL. In my case it was my parents generation that was called to war. I applaud the President today, and perhaps you know that’s not easy for me. I particularly liked the emphasis that the young and healthy have a role to play. Even if it is just sitting on their couch. Hopefully he did a lot today to get us all on the same page.