No one is spending $2m on Francis..lmao
He’s a good player on a bad team so I get why some of you think he’s just going to put up higher numbers on a better team.
If he created more for teammates or rebounded better then maybe he’d be in that range.
Why does he need to put up higher numbers?
Lets take SMU just as an example and a $20m budget.
Suppose $12m for their 5 starters.
That leaves $8m for the bench.
Francis has a proven skill of scoring now.
Spending $1.5m for a scorer off the bench isn't alot.
He wouldn't be a starter and need to score 20ppg or be a huge facilitator.
He would only be 7.5% of their budget.
Alternatively, at Rutgers his same $1.5m would be 15% of a high end $10m budget.
For 15% he would need to be a major contributor.
Same money - different roles - different expectations.
Its not this about the $$. It's also the role and percent of budget.