It's what we need to do and sell it to an investor**
Fishwater, you're on deckIt's what we need to do and sell it to an investor**
Nah, Bulldog1977Fishwater, you're on deck
Really? Who would invest? What the real value proposition of MSU athletics to an investor?Nah, Bulldog1977
He’s the one who keeps telling people to invest.
Really? Who would invest? What the real value proposition of MSU athletics to an investor?
&tate gonna &tate
Whatever… we all know it’s a ”pink sheet” transactionThey say buy low. Our athletic department matches that description
ROI has been outstanding, blue chip*Really? Who would invest? What the real value proposition of MSU athletics to an investor?
&tate gonna &tate
Not a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.The thing I’ve been saying for a while is that people are going to figure out a way to get around Title IX by outsourcing sports from the university, but no one else seems to believe that/care.
so for my legal experts here, does this move in that direction and/or accomplish this?
Couldn't the new LLC run Athletics as its "Corporate Mission" and then license the MSU name/affliation along with the facilities, etc.?Not a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
AgreeNot a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
What I’ve said in the past too is that the school could maintain facilities for a period of time that gives everyone equal opportunity to rent them based on some mandatory margin, but the unprofitable sports wouldn’t be able to afford it.Couldn't the new LLC run Athletics as its "Corporate Mission" and then license the MSU name/affliation along with the facilities, etc.?
Could be a way forward for us for someone or entity that might want to "own" an SEC franchise?
All this is so crazy.
I didn’t look closely at what exactly KY did, who owns the LLC, etc., but I do think there’s absolutely a path to it, which probably intensifies if/when the NCAA goes awayNot a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
Courts would pierce that corporate veil like it was nothing. Bringing in outside investment would be a disaster for any college athletic program. FSU looked at it when they were trying to raise money to get out of the ACC. Didn’t take them long to abandon that idea.I didn’t look closely at what exactly KY did, who owns the LLC, etc., but I do think there’s absolutely a path to it, which probably intensifies if/when the NCAA goes away
Don’t think it’s a piercing the corporate veil issue. There are some creative approaches here. I will be interested to see who does what and whether they get challengedCourts would pierce that corporate veil like it was nothing. Bringing in outside investment would be a disaster for any college athletic program. FSU looked at it when they were trying to raise money to get out of the ACC. Didn’t take them long to abandon that idea.
If they're trying to get out of Title IX, it definitely will be. And yeah, it will be interesting to see how this goes. But if you sell out your football and basketball programs to outside investors, they will milk you dry and you'll have nothing left.Don’t think it’s a piercing the corporate veil issue. There are some creative approaches here. I will be interested to see who does what and whether they get challenged
Looks like a beer label
The “LLC” on the beer label stands for “Limited Lager Content”****