Kentucky making its athletics department a limited liability company…

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
4,216
6,275
113
The thing I’ve been saying for a while is that people are going to figure out a way to get around Title IX by outsourcing sports from the university, but no one else seems to believe that/care.

so for my legal experts here, does this move in that direction and/or accomplish this?
 

Mr. Cook

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
3,085
2,210
113
ROI has been outstanding, blue chip*
This Is Fine GIF by 100% Soft
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,680
19,515
113
The thing I’ve been saying for a while is that people are going to figure out a way to get around Title IX by outsourcing sports from the university, but no one else seems to believe that/care.

so for my legal experts here, does this move in that direction and/or accomplish this?
Not a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
 

HRMSU

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2022
1,162
1,037
113
Not a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
Couldn't the new LLC run Athletics as its "Corporate Mission" and then license the MSU name/affliation along with the facilities, etc.?

Could be a way forward for us for someone or entity that might want to "own" an SEC franchise?

All this is so crazy.
 

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
4,216
6,275
113
Couldn't the new LLC run Athletics as its "Corporate Mission" and then license the MSU name/affliation along with the facilities, etc.?

Could be a way forward for us for someone or entity that might want to "own" an SEC franchise?

All this is so crazy.
What I’ve said in the past too is that the school could maintain facilities for a period of time that gives everyone equal opportunity to rent them based on some mandatory margin, but the unprofitable sports wouldn’t be able to afford it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRMSU

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
4,216
6,275
113
Not a legal expert, but that wouldn’t last a minute in the courts.
I didn’t look closely at what exactly KY did, who owns the LLC, etc., but I do think there’s absolutely a path to it, which probably intensifies if/when the NCAA goes away
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irondawg

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,680
19,515
113
I didn’t look closely at what exactly KY did, who owns the LLC, etc., but I do think there’s absolutely a path to it, which probably intensifies if/when the NCAA goes away
Courts would pierce that corporate veil like it was nothing. Bringing in outside investment would be a disaster for any college athletic program. FSU looked at it when they were trying to raise money to get out of the ACC. Didn’t take them long to abandon that idea.
 

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
17,006
10,132
113
I always thought setting up a 501C(3) to pay players would have been a good idea. I don't know if that is the correct tax code but I hope you know what I mean. I think all the contributions to it would be tax deductible. Have one set up for each sport that way the contributors could control what sport their money goes to. Then make the athletes of each sport an employee of those foundations. Not a tax guy I could be wrong.
But what do I know, I am just an old Marine who somehow graduated from a major university.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Cook

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
4,216
6,275
113
Courts would pierce that corporate veil like it was nothing. Bringing in outside investment would be a disaster for any college athletic program. FSU looked at it when they were trying to raise money to get out of the ACC. Didn’t take them long to abandon that idea.
Don’t think it’s a piercing the corporate veil issue. There are some creative approaches here. I will be interested to see who does what and whether they get challenged
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Cook

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,680
19,515
113
Don’t think it’s a piercing the corporate veil issue. There are some creative approaches here. I will be interested to see who does what and whether they get challenged
If they're trying to get out of Title IX, it definitely will be. And yeah, it will be interesting to see how this goes. But if you sell out your football and basketball programs to outside investors, they will milk you dry and you'll have nothing left.
 

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
8,651
7,153
113
Since we are running a business here. I have a thought. No NIL for players. Instead we tip them after the game... Soon those tips will be tax free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: prdubya

Irondawg

Active member
Dec 2, 2007
2,596
228
63
I think you’d have to remove scholarships to get around title ix.

all these guys have lawyers working on stuff and people are starting to try anything as you have this and what Arkansas cooked up this week as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Maroon13

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
2,750
2,729
113
LLC does NOT remove the obligation of a company or person to follow the law, for example Title IX.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
10,344
9,665
113
I don’t see this as much different than before. Except now maybe somebody will profit from it?
 

Dawgzilla2

Well-known member
Oct 9, 2022
1,333
1,478
113
If the athletes are still students, then Title IX still applies. There is no way the university can just shrug and say, "welp, we have no control over how this LLC treats our students".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon13