...At one time the "consensus" was the earth was flat.
...
:^That's why people who could barely pass a high school science class think they can watch a few Youtube videos and become more knowledgeable than actual scientific experts.
Yes, I put full faith in GOVERNMENT RAN education.
.
Run, not ran. Perhaps your grammar skills wouldn't be so weak if you had put more faith in our education system.
At one time the "consensus" was the earth was flat.
Just to make sure we're on the same page, what do you consider the definition of macroevolution to be?
LolYou may well be adept at your own branch of science but if so you need to point that sharp mind toward the propaganda you've been sold. The carbon 14 you mentioned is no friend at all to deep-timers. Its half life is so short that no amount of it at all could persist more than a hundred thousand years. Which is a serious problem for long agers since diamonds everywhere are chock of it in situ, to the point where attempts to explain it all away by sample contamination have become outright hilarious. Potsssium-argon analysis on the other hand only gives old-Earth results if you interpret the measured proportions using old-Earth assumptions about the starting ratios. It's highly circular and is of no value whatsoever in "proving" the interpretive framework under which it is used.
What's even more useful and critical though it to examine the history of what passes for secular origins science. For example, did LeMaitre begin with any scientific observations when he set up his Big Bang model, or did he just give mathematical form to Teilhard's heretical fantasy that so inspired him, and then adjust the numbers for that post-hoc until the laughter quieted down a bit and a younger, more naive generation of scientists started to give him public credence? Did Charles Darwin actually get any ideas from looking at finches, or did he simply republish and repackage his grandfather's (Erasmus Darwin) ridiculously impluasible atheist's wet dream Zoonomia with the Biblical creationist Edward Bylthe's idea about natural selection crammed into it?
The whole thing's a ridiculous house of mirrors and the closer you look at absolutely any part of it with authentic scientific thinking--especially if you look at the history of thinking behind it--the more it will unravel.
Haha!
Utter nonsense. The Greeks circa 300 BC proved the Earth was a sphere.
This contention is a modern exercise in dishonesty and/or flamboyant ignorance. It's sprung with the sole purpose to discredit certain scientific theories that individuals find unpalatable, be it due to political affiliation or religion.
I've played devils advocate long enough here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately."
:boom:
There's basically a 100,000% chance I'm going to yell "You dumbass Dunning-Kruger Effect motherf***er!" at someone in the near future. And it will be well deserved.
:boom:
There's basically a 100,000% chance I'm going to yell "You dumbass Dunning-Kruger Effect motherf***er!" at someone in the near future. And it will be well deserved.
You'll have plenty of potential targets. Because, unfortunately, the internet age has spawned a worldwide epidemic of Dunning-Kruger effect dumbasses like never before in history. People now read a few junk science or conspiracy freak websites, perhaps view some youtube videos, and then delude themselves into thinking they know more than real scientists and historians.
And, as someone else noted, it's usually people that could barely pass their high school science classes. But they've got ready made excuses to explain that--"by god, my grades weren't my fault, instead it was just that public education propaganda conspiring against me...."
You'll have plenty of potential targets. Because, unfortunately, the internet age has spawned a worldwide epidemic of Dunning-Kruger effect dumbasses like never before in history. People now read a few junk science or conspiracy freak websites, perhaps view some youtube videos, and then delude themselves into thinking they know more than real scientists and historians.
And, as someone else noted, it's usually people that could barely pass their high school science classes. But they've got ready made excuses to explain that--"by god, my grades weren't my fault, instead it was just that public education propaganda conspiring against me...."
To flat earthers, all pictures showing a globe earth are photoshopped by NASA for some reason. Still not sure what the actual conspiracy is.
The sun is actually really small and moves in a circular path above the flat earth. Rather than being a raging ball of plasma, think of it more like a flashlight.
I can't remember the nonsense about why we don't go to the edge of the flat earth, but it's pretty in line with the other stuff.
And there's a dome covering the flat earth, kind of like a snow globe.