I know it seems like heresy, but there HAS to be someone you didn't particularly like. I would expect there would be some Sheed responses, but for me it was Greg Newton.
OFC
OFC
Won't be the first time!You're gunna be blasted lol
As always, Mark, a good response from you. I was waiting for that name to come up.Taylor King
King was just such a disappointment. If memory serves me correctly, I think he was the #1 ranked player in his class as an 8th grader, which I guess just goes to show how silly those early rankings really are.As always, Mark, a good response from you. I was waiting for that name to come up.
OFC
Agree. After watching him in the McDonald's game I thought he would be unstoppable. I am glad, however, that his Mom showed up at a lot of games, even if Josh didn't!I don't really have a least favorite, but a most frustrating. And to me that was Josh McRoberts, guy had all the talent in the world but did not seem like he wanted it all that much.
Yep....Did not represent Duke well.Nailed it. Taylor King for me, too.
Yeah, I'm with you there...especially the lack of foresight by some of the recruits which then reduces their competitive nature when they don't earn minutes. No matter what potential coaches may suggest they see in a recruit it's ultimately the player's job to reach it. Obviously other factors play a part and one class can't necessarily project who comes in the next year. I think what also complicates things for some kids is coming to grips with being a role player.Probably some kids who didn't stick it out. The problem with so many young players today is that they need the instant gratification. It's almost as if they didn't know what they were getting themselves into. Duke, along with schools like UNC, UK, KU, etc. are bringing in great players almost every year. You're forced to compete with some of the best players in the country every day....IN PRACTICE! Some kids just can't handle that.
I don't think it's right to include Elliott Williams in that group.King, Burgess, EWill, Sheed at the end.
I think the 2012 team woulda been just fine without Austin. Seth would of and could of led that team much better
DEAD FREAKING WRONG.I think the 2012 team woulda been just fine without Austin. Seth would of and could of led that team much better
I think these are pretty valid points and I also agree with the general hesitancy to post in this type of thread. While it's hard to say if other players would have developed at a more accelerated rate had Rivers not had such a dominant in-game presence at times, he was fun to watch overall. He also hit one of the biggest shots in the Duke/UNC rivalry, which always carries a magnitude of its own, irrespective of either team's ranking coming into the game, or even what either team goes on to do afterwards. I think it's important to cherish the memory of that game, even if that season ended in disappointment.It's hard to make that assertion, let alone convince someone it could have been even kind of true. Austin was far and away the best player on that team. Far and away. Did he dribble too much sometimes and take stupid shots? Yes, he did. That's not what I'm arguing.
Everything about that 2012 team, minus the loss to Lehigh, screams overachieving. We can't overthink things. Mason in 2012 wasn't Mason of 2013 the All-American. Seth Curry wasn't the second-team All-ACC player he was the following year. And Ryan was nowhere near what he became as a senior. Too many times we correlate what a player was at his best and use it in how we judge them. That's not the way this works.
Hell, how we remember Quinn Cook today is a complete 180 from how he was viewed 12 months ago. People wanted him to transfer then. Now he'll go down as one of Duke's best senior leaders ever. EVER! There's some pretty impressive names on that list.
Everyone knows I don't like these threads for the simple fact that I just don't see the point. On a Duke board, trashing former Duke players....well, it just doesn't fit in my eyes. But whatever.
I could've sworn this thread said least favorite Duke player.......I'm a KY guy but mine at UK were Andre Riddick and Jared Pricket. If they weren't dunking, they had a better shot of kicking it into the other basket. Drove me crazy. No touch at all.
It's hard to make that assertion, let alone convince someone it could have been even kind of true. Austin was far and away the best player on that team. Far and away. Did he dribble too much sometimes and take stupid shots? Yes, he did. That's not what I'm arguing.
Everything about that 2012 team, minus the loss to Lehigh, screams overachieving. We can't overthink things. Mason in 2012 wasn't Mason of 2013 the All-American. Seth Curry wasn't the second-team All-ACC player he was the following year. And Ryan was nowhere near what he became as a senior. Too many times we correlate what a player was at his best and use it in how we judge them. That's not the way this works.
Greg Paulus used to drive me absolutely freakin crasy because he had a bad habit of dribbling himself into bad situations and turning the ball over because of it but then his senior year when he came off the bench something seemed to click and he was much improved.
Thing about Paulus for me was the off the court in your face attitude when he couldn't back it up on the court. I'll just leave it at this- it really hurt our recruiting those years.Personally, I hate when Greg get's thrown into conversations like this. He was obviously quite frustrating to watch -- particularly when matched up against UNC. But it really wasn't his fault. He just didn't have the talent to be the starting PG at a program like Duke. IMO, he was a victim of recruiting rankings deluding fans into thinking he was the next Bobby Hurley + Coach K identifying Greg as the future of the PG position at Duke. Greg would have been a fine PG at a mid-major program or a lesser ACC rival. But he just didn't have the footspeed, size, athleticism, and ball handling to be a lead PG on a team that wanted to compete with the likes of UNC for conference titles --- particularly while playing on a roster that didn't have a lot of size / athleticism to cover for Greg's weaknesses. For instance, while I think Greg would have had problems on any Duke team, it certainly didn't help that -- after his freshman year -- we had absolutely no length / rim-protection to cover him when guys got in the lane.
good points DJ and I see that. I was just under the assumption a lot of crap went on behind the scenes and a lot of it was Austin and Seth got the raw end just from what I heard but who knows. Kelly getting hurt that year is the reason we lost to Lehigh tho IMO. Rivers isn't my least fav player ever here heck he even gave us one of the greatest moments at DESIt's hard to make that assertion, let alone convince someone it could have been even kind of true. Austin was far and away the best player on that team. Far and away. Did he dribble too much sometimes and take stupid shots? Yes, he did. That's not what I'm arguing.
Everything about that 2012 team, minus the loss to Lehigh, screams overachieving. We can't overthink things. Mason in 2012 wasn't Mason of 2013 the All-American. Seth Curry wasn't the second-team All-ACC player he was the following year. And Ryan was nowhere near what he became as a senior. Too many times we correlate what a player was at his best and use it in how we judge them. That's not the way this works.
Hell, how we remember Quinn Cook today is a complete 180 from how he was viewed 12 months ago. People wanted him to transfer then. Now he'll go down as one of Duke's best senior leaders ever. EVER! There's some pretty impressive names on that list.
Everyone knows I don't like these threads for the simple fact that I just don't see the point. On a Duke board, trashing former Duke players....well, it just doesn't fit in my eyes. But whatever.
A few points I'll make....
The 2012 season wasn't the fault of Austin Rivers. He gets a really bad rap for one reason and one reason only....we lost to Lehigh. That team, in general, probably overachieved before getting to the NCAA Tournament. When you think about losing Singler, Smith and Irving in the year prior we had to figure there would be a dropoff. Still, somehow, we ended up a 2-seed in the NCAA Tournament. It just, unfortunately, imploded when we arrived. That 2012 team would have been lost without a player like Austin's mentality. And I mean lost.
I think Taylor King had issues beyond basketball, and I think that's been proven over and over again since he left Duke. He was battling some demons. I've told this story before and some probably remember it, but his freshman year Duke played in Maui. My wife and I went that season and walking back one night to our hotel along the beach we came across Taylor laying in a hammock smoking cigarettes and drinking a beer. We had a game the next day, and Taylor didn't play. After seeing him in the hammock I told my wife that night I didn't know if Taylor had what it took to cut it. Unfortunately I was right.
I don't harbor any ill-will toward Elliot Williams. He did what he felt he had to do. I know it was floated out there that he wanted to be closer to home because his mom was ill, and while that was probably partly true, he also didn't want to be at Duke. It worked out just fine. He went to Memphis, had a big year and became a first-round pick. That's what he was after. We won the national championship. I'm fine with that.
As for Rasheed, that one still brings me down and will for a while. He loved Duke so much, but he also displayed a bad attitude....and that's just what we saw sometimes on the court. According to people within the program is was even worse behind closed doors. He was my favorite recruit back when he committed because of his passion and love for Duke. You could just hear it in his voice and see it in his eyes. Plus, I was excited to see how his career could have ended as a senior. Oh well.
Thanks dbav -- After reading and re-reading the thread it just made me think how would I fare. I am guessing I would be in the top 95%Great post LT.