THE one? Absolutely not - he's not meaningful enough to have that kind of effect. A one (and not the steak sauce)? Absolutely. It also reflects poorly on the alumni ... that they chose to have someone like that represent them ... and then, after it's clear he's a problem, and not a solution ... they continue to support him. It's one thing to make a mistake. It's quite another to see the mistake, and dig your heels in and say "I'm standing by it" or "I'm even more fervently behind it now."
Dude, are you serious? The BOT has done far, far worse.
If it were just about Barry, you might have a point. But they are after Lubrano too. They already took steps to remove him as well. And they've made any public dissent an actionable offense. ANY. And, BTW, Barry won his suit regarding access to financials. As well he should have. He was right on that. What secrets are they keeping?? And to whose benefit?
Please be kidding. This University had an ex-drug dealer, who spent time in prison for this crime, as the Chairman of the Board. That guy only took things from the University.
Barry has done nothing to look out for the 'best interests of the university'. I've called him out multiple times and will continue to do so. Barry looks out for Barry, has shown a shocking level of either gross incompetence or pure misunderstanding of a field he is supposed to be a professional in and, cost the university money and time by tying up resources (and soliciting alumni to sue the school he's supposed to represent) and behaved inappropriately towards a junior female staffer. All of this happened while he was acting as a representative as a member of the BOT.
For those of you following along from home.....
Exactly ... His wording is exactly the same as Noogy. Poor attempt at trollingFor those of you following along from home.....
@NorthernStatePSU = @Moogy
This goofball has more monikers than that Pitt fan from Johnstown who used his VPN to generate hundreds of user names on the former BWI/Mc board during the Sandusky period.
@Moogy doesn't seem to have much of a life.
Thanks, I must have been asleep at the wheel. I'll take care of this right away.For those of you following along from home.....
@NorthernStatePSU = @Moogy
This goofball has more monikers than that Pitt fan from Johnstown who used his VPN to generate hundreds of user names on the former BWI/Mc board during the Sandusky period.
@Moogy doesn't seem to have much of a life.
For those of you following along from home.....
@NorthernStatePSU = @Moogy
This goofball has more monikers than that Pitt fan from Johnstown who used his VPN to generate hundreds of user names on the former BWI/Mc board during the Sandusky period.
@Moogy doesn't seem to have much of a life.
We all have different opinions on the topic. But suggesting that someone needs professional help because their opinion differs from yours?? That makes you little different from what you're complaining about with Barry. We can disagree without the name calling.
It’s better than you and the rest of this board having circle jerks over a pedo or a dead football coachNoogy trying hard in his trolling. Notice how he only posts to political BOT issues on the board. He hardly every posts on anything about football or other sports. Remember folks don't feed the trolls. He has been hard creating other handles as well.
That's really inappropriate.
For those of you following along from home.....
@NorthernStatePSU = @Moogy
This goofball has more monikers than that Pitt fan from Johnstown who used his VPN to generate hundreds of user names on the former BWI/Mc board during the Sandusky period.
@Moogy doesn't seem to have much of a life.
The issue IS, and always has been, Joe. You had a $50M naming rights deal, and the usual suspects - who you support and who are at issue here - could only focus on JoePa. They gave repeated soliloquys devoted to JoePa when the issue of the naming rights was discussed before the board vote. Something that really had nothing to do with JoePa was turned into a JoePa fest.
There's good ol' Noogy...
The former PennsylOracle would never write such a statement.
Delusion might be your sole remaining friend in your pathetic life.
But you are a real person (@Moogy) that’s what makes it so entertaining.
Delusion might be your sole remaining friend in your pathetic life.
I trust you on four things only
)
What I've never seen before is someone, who is allegedly a licensed financial professional, make the argument that an entity that CAN NOT have goodwill on its balance sheet, has goodwill on its balance sheet. This is something anyone who has taken even an intro accounting course would know, let alone a financial services professional. I've also never seen someone then try to argue that the entity he's representing should forego a $50m payday because of this goodwill, which doesn't, and can not exist. I've also never seen someone try to argue that, even though this money will help pay a large debt that is coming due, we should forego it, in favor of some mythical amount that would be raised, instead ... despite presenting absolutely NO evidence to support the assertion that any kind of alternative funds could be raised (let alone some good faith estimate of how much could be raised) ... having had years to raise said funds, and doing absolutely NOTHING toward this end.
Why not research the candidates and form your own opinions? Blindly voting for whom others tell you too is how PS4RS took over the alumni trustee elections and packed the seats with whomever they wanted, their sheep just followed along without questions. Write in Barry if you want to waste your vote, as no matter how many votes he gets he's not going to be permitted to be re-elected by the board.
The only "hope" I see is action from the state legislature. Just ponder that for a moment- the Pennsylvania State Legislature- possibly the only group of people you could find in the state who might be worse than our BOT.
