Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals" data-source="post: 131691806" data-attributes="member: 1759980">Kilabeas said...&nbsp; (original post) For a former newspaper editor, you sure make a lot of mistakes.Jack the Snake? That doesn’t even rhyme...it’s Jake.You listed Syracuse twice as teams with winning records, left out a 9-3 Virginia Tech team and completely whiffed on our non-conference win over No. 17 ranked Louisville, which also finished 9-3. You claim to be a numbers guy, but you always ***** them up. I admit my mistake. So I went back and let the calculator do the math for me since my 88-year-old brain strays.2007 UNDER RICH RODRIGUEZWVU 64, Western Michigan 24&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Western Michigan finished 5-7WVU 48, Marshall 23&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Marshall finished 3-9WVU 31, Maryland 14&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Maryland finished 6-7WVU 48, East Carolina 7&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; East Carolina finished 8-5WVU 13, South Florida 21&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; South Florida finished 9-4WVU 55, Syracuse 14&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Syracuse finished 2-10WVU 55, Mississippi State 13&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mississippi State finished 8-5WVU 31, Rutgers 3&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Rutgers finished 8-5WVU 38, Louisville 31&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Louisville finished 6-6WVU 28, Cincinnati 23&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Cincinnati finished 10-3WVU 66, Connecticut 21&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Connecticut finished 9-4WVU 9, Pitt 13&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Pitt finished 5-7WVU 48, Oklahoma 28&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Oklahoma finished 11-3COMBINED RECORD OF WVU’S OPPONENTS FOR THE SEASON: 91-75 (80-72 REGULAR SEASON)UNDER DON NEHLENIn 1993WVU 41, Pitt 21 Pitt finished 3-8WVU 58, Rutgers 22&nbsp;&nbsp; Rutgers finished 4-7WVU 49, Temple 7&nbsp;&nbsp; Temple finished 1-10WVU 17, Miami 14&nbsp;&nbsp; Miami finished 9-3WVU 17, Boston College 14&nbsp;&nbsp; Boston College finished 9-3WVU 14, Virginia Tech 13 Virginia Tech finished 9-3&nbsp; WVU 43, Syracuse 0&nbsp; Syracuse finished 6-4WVU 36, Louisville 34&nbsp; Louisville finished 9-3WVU 42, Maryland 37 Maryland finished 2-9WVU 35, Missouri 3 Missouri finished 3-7-1WVU 48, Eastern Michigan 6 Eastern Michigan finished 4-7WVU 7, Florida 41 in Sugar Bowl&nbsp; &nbsp; Florida finished 11-2COMBINED SEASONS OF WVU OPPONENTS: 72-65 (61-63 REGULAR SEASON)REGULAR SEASON RICH 80-72, DON 61-63.Rich’s 2007 team beat SEVEN teams by a combined 299 points, an astounding average of 37.4 points a game. It was a combination steamroller and flamethrower!Rich’s 2007 team DESTROYED 6 teams with winning records by 20 to 48 points!And lost to South Florida by 8 and Pitt by 4.WVU beat Western Michigan by 40 points, Marshall by 25 points, East Carolina by 41 points, Syracuse by 41 points, Mississippi State by 42 points, Rutgers by 28 points, Connecticut by 45 points, Oklahoma by 20 points, Maryland by 17 pointsDon’s 1993 team beat ONE team with a winning record by more than 3 points, demolished a 6-4 Syracuse by 43-0.Those are the numbers talking impartially. Do with them what you want. Twist or believe your eyes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals, post: 131691806, member: 1759980"] Kilabeas said... (original post) For a former newspaper editor, you sure make a lot of mistakes. Jack the Snake? That doesn’t even rhyme...it’s Jake. You listed Syracuse twice as teams with winning records, left out a 9-3 Virginia Tech team and completely whiffed on our non-conference win over No. 17 ranked Louisville, which also finished 9-3. You claim to be a numbers guy, but you always ***** them up. I admit my mistake. So I went back and let the calculator do the math for me since my 88-year-old brain strays. 2007 UNDER RICH RODRIGUEZ WVU 64, Western Michigan 24 Western Michigan finished 5-7 WVU 48, Marshall 23 Marshall finished 3-9 WVU 31, Maryland 14 Maryland finished 6-7 WVU 48, East Carolina 7 East Carolina finished 8-5 WVU 13, South Florida 21 South Florida finished 9-4 WVU 55, Syracuse 14 Syracuse finished 2-10 WVU 55, Mississippi State 13 Mississippi State finished 8-5 WVU 31, Rutgers 3 Rutgers finished 8-5 WVU 38, Louisville 31 Louisville finished 6-6 WVU 28, Cincinnati 23 Cincinnati finished 10-3 WVU 66, Connecticut 21 Connecticut finished 9-4 WVU 9, Pitt 13 Pitt finished 5-7 WVU 48, Oklahoma 28 Oklahoma finished 11-3 COMBINED RECORD OF WVU’S OPPONENTS FOR THE SEASON: 91-75 (80-72 REGULAR SEASON) UNDER DON NEHLEN In 1993 WVU 41, Pitt 21 Pitt finished 3-8 WVU 58, Rutgers 22 Rutgers finished 4-7 WVU 49, Temple 7 Temple finished 1-10 WVU 17, Miami 14 Miami finished 9-3 WVU 17, Boston College 14 Boston College finished 9-3 WVU 14, Virginia Tech 13 Virginia Tech finished 9-3 WVU 43, Syracuse 0 Syracuse finished 6-4 WVU 36, Louisville 34 Louisville finished 9-3 WVU 42, Maryland 37 Maryland finished 2-9 WVU 35, Missouri 3 Missouri finished 3-7-1 WVU 48, Eastern Michigan 6 Eastern Michigan finished 4-7 WVU 7, Florida 41 in Sugar Bowl Florida finished 11-2 COMBINED SEASONS OF WVU OPPONENTS: 72-65 (61-63 REGULAR SEASON) REGULAR SEASON RICH 80-72, DON 61-63. Rich’s 2007 team beat SEVEN teams by a combined 299 points, an astounding average of 37.4 points a game. It was a combination steamroller and flamethrower! Rich’s 2007 team DESTROYED 6 teams with winning records by 20 to 48 points! And lost to South Florida by 8 and Pitt by 4. WVU beat Western Michigan by 40 points, Marshall by 25 points, East Carolina by 41 points, Syracuse by 41 points, Mississippi State by 42 points, Rutgers by 28 points, Connecticut by 45 points, Oklahoma by 20 points, Maryland by 17 points Don’s 1993 team beat ONE team with a winning record by more than 3 points, demolished a 6-4 Syracuse by 43-0. Those are the numbers talking impartially. Do with them what you want. Twist or believe your eyes. [/QUOTE]

Name