Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wbgvwbgv" data-source="post: 129289999" data-attributes="member: 1417056">Of course you could say that about every school that wasn't already in a power conference.&nbsp; Pitt's only option was the ACC.&nbsp; Rutgers' only option was the Big 10.&nbsp; Utah's only option was the PAC12.&nbsp; TCU's only option was the Big 12.&nbsp; Syracuse &amp; Louisville's only option was the ACC.&nbsp; You could even say that Penn State's only option was the Big 10.&nbsp; Schools that decided to change from one power conference to another power conference like Maryland and Texas A&amp;M were the only schools that really had options.And not one non-power school in recent times that was offered membership to a power conference ever declined that offer (except Notre Dame).&nbsp; I can't imagine any President or A.D. from any school not jumping on a power conference membership worth hundreds of millions of dollars - that would be totally irresponsible and stupid (Furfari &amp; friends).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wbgvwbgv, post: 129289999, member: 1417056"] Of course you could say that about every school that wasn't already in a power conference. Pitt's only option was the ACC. Rutgers' only option was the Big 10. Utah's only option was the PAC12. TCU's only option was the Big 12. Syracuse & Louisville's only option was the ACC. You could even say that Penn State's only option was the Big 10. Schools that decided to change from one power conference to another power conference like Maryland and Texas A&M were the only schools that really had options. And not one non-power school in recent times that was offered membership to a power conference ever declined that offer (except Notre Dame). I can't imagine any President or A.D. from any school not jumping on a power conference membership worth hundreds of millions of dollars - that would be totally irresponsible and stupid (Furfari & friends). [/QUOTE]

Name